Arnold Schwarzenegger on Roman Polanski

[YoungBlood]

guys we havent seen her picture yet.

I think this was her then:



And her now:



Gailey is also pro-Polanski now...she says leave him alone.

[The Showstoppa]

Gailey is also pro-Polanski now...she says leave him alone.

I wonder how much he has increased her bank account over the years to ensure that?  Doesn't matter either way.  He commited a heinous crime and deserves punishment just like every other shitbag.

[YoungBlood]

I wonder how much he has increased her bank account over the years to ensure that?  Doesn't matter either way.  He commited a heinous crime and deserves punishment just like every other shitbag.

Don't know, but either way I think the guy should be in prison being someone else's bitch.

[The Showstoppa]

Don't know, but either way I think the guy should be in prison being someone else's bitch.

QFT

[disco_stu]

He had anal sex with a drugged underage kid,if some of you think thats ok,then you need some serious help.

BINGO.

again this site- and alot of americans...continue to amaze.

Here you have a guy who at the time WAS influential in his home country, WAS an adult, WAS able to know what is right and wrong, WAS aware of what influence he has and all that added up amounts to a situation where, whether "consentual" or not- a child has submitted to an adult act.

I am shocked that he also sodomised her...i wasnt aware of that detail.

We'd be after him with pitchforks if he wasnt a well known celeb and be calling for his nuts in a sling.

30 years ago?...oh ok, then lets leave those pesky holocaust animals to their retirements then, and lets also clear out the cold case archive so we can get the space for a new lunch room down at the station.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Arnold is just THE fucking man

At a time when these weak fucking celebrities demand that Roman Polanski a Child rapist should be let free - because hes just such an important person (I focking hated the piano - arty fancy pancy fuck off)
Arnold said it like it is..

He said he shouldn't be treated any different then any other person who is/was charged with such a crime.

HOW THE FUCK!!!! can these hollywood no good rich spoiled fucking pukes be on the side of a Child rapist? If he would be a nobody they would want him hanged...I MAKES SO ANGRY I'M GOING TO SACRAFICE A NEWBORN PUPPY AND DRINK HIS BLOOD!!!!!

Hes a childrapist for fucks sake - whats wise about that move? Well for a starter he cannot do it again.hahah basicly she said it was suprise sex - it wasn't rape rape what the fuck is that? So it was rape but it wasn't? Oh yeah shows you again if the person accused of a crime is too well known the crime becomes negotiable.
Like what? he ran from the law for far too long - how the fuck did he get away with it in the first place.. I applaud the Switz athority.
What a dumb fuckOh its alright folks  - you can rape little children all you want - just don't kill'em that wouldn't be nice - and yeah you dumb fuck the victim has asked for the case to be dismissed because she probably finally managed to have a "normal" life and doesn't want to be dragged through the dirt - sounds plausible? not to Fonda

I tell you what we all should do BOYCOT the fuck of anybody who makes a movie and defended that asshole - fuck these rich fucks.

fuck Polanski I hope he rots in that imaginary hell

[liberalismo]

Yes, they should ignore his wrong because that will help out..... how about just go after all the scum?

Pointless.

[chaos]

I'm a lib and I'd beat your pussy ass into the ground and not even say sorry

Brutal tough guy post.

[liberalismo]

You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.

The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.

This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.

You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.


If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!

[liberalismo]

I saw Debra Winger defending him and was wondering the same thing about her...what if it would have been her daughter?  What if it would have even been her mother as an adult?  It was RAPE....not consensual.  

Apparently he admitted it and fled the country the next day.


I'd post what a 13 year old girl looks like but decided against it.


Here is a 13 year old boy.  Looks like a little BOY.  She was a 13 year old little girl.

Turns out that kid wasn't the dad.

[chaos]

You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.

The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.

This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.

You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.


If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!

Meltdown.

[pedro01]

The incident was more than 30 years ago and the "victim", a drugged under-aged model who had sex with him willingly, has forgiven him in public already for decades. It was no rape, it's just that sex with minors in the US was (or still is?) declarated a rape automatically.

Why the drama?....

So the fact that the underage girl was drugged up makes this OK ?

So - if I go out & find a couple of glued-up 12 years olds in Bangkok slums and give them a length, that would be fine with you ?

The mind boggles.

If I found a drugged up teen, I'd be doing what I could to get her into rehab, not doing what I could to get into her pants.

[pedro01]

The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason.

You don't think protecting his future victims is rational 

[evandatp]

I am a republican
And I would simply hire someone to break your legs

But what if you've spent all your money grooming helping young male relatives?

[MB_722]

oh boy...another celeb f##ks up and it's big news.  dont see many stories about the nor amer and euro peds running wild in poor countries.  use some resources on them  

interesting point ... it's a distraction.

what are the odds Switzerland finally decides to let authorities arrest him? Something fishy happening here.

[Ropo]

not only was she 13, but he also drugged her up first!  the guy is a piece of shit and I can't wait for him to go to a cali jail and this time he will be the one getting raped.  let's see if whoopi goldberg calls that "rape-rape."

Jesus Christ what a witch hunt. You teen twats are ready to hang that poor idiot for something he has done over 20 years before you were born, without any knowledge what really has happen? Roman was in a party, he was drunk and high, and he met a hot young bitch in there and they have sex. The bitch wasn't any shy little virgin with pony tails and lollipop, she was some kind a party toy who fuck with anyone to get high and no one knows her real age at the moment, she was in every party in town. Roman was famous so the little bitch calculated that there will be some money for her if she go to police, but what a disappointment, Roman runs and didn't pay anything. She got nothing, her party times are over because everybody knows what a under age teen whore she is, and to save that little she has, she gives a interview where she told that she doesn't blame Polanski.  Where is the crime?

Who can say he will do differently when at the party, sizzling hot young girl want to have sex with him. 99,98% of any man who have a some kind of dick, will fuck her and those 00.2% are eunuchs. In USA there is over a million teen pregnancies per year, so Romans mistake is quite common. Youngest of those are 10 years old, so it seem to me that many of you doesn't ask girls age before sex. Only thing which you can blame Polanski, is the fact that he was careless and stupid, but in those times it wasn't big deal. Every one fuck any one at the party, no aids, no paparazzi pushing his camera at your asshole every time you drop your pants.  Everybody in hollywood uses drugs, a half of film industry is permanently high by every drug you can name of. Stars dies by OD's, there is has been Manson's massacre etc., so if star like Polanski slip his dick in the wrong pussy, will that really be so big deal?
   

[YoungBlood]

Jesus Christ what a witch hunt. You teen twats are ready to hang that poor idiot for something he has done over 20 years before you were born, without any knowledge what really has happen? Roman was in a party, he was drunk and high, and he met a hot young bitch in there and they have sex. The bitch wasn't any shy little virgin with pony tails and lollipop, she was some kind a party toy who fuck with anyone to get high and no one knows her real age at the moment, she was in every party in town. Roman was famous so the little bitch calculated that there will be some money for her if she go to police, but what a disappointment, Roman runs and didn't pay anything. She got nothing, her party times are over because everybody knows what a under age teen whore she is, and to save that little she has, she gives a interview where she told that she doesn't blame Polanski.  Where is the crime?

Who can say he will do differently when at the party, sizzling hot young girl want to have sex with him. 99,98% of any man who have a some kind of dick, will fuck her and those 00.2% are eunuchs. In USA there is over a million teen pregnancies per year, so Romans mistake is quite common. Youngest of those are 10 years old, so it seem to me that many of you doesn't ask girls age before sex. Only thing which you can blame Polanski, is the fact that he was careless and stupid, but in those times it wasn't big deal. Every one fuck any one at the party, no aids, no paparazzi pushing his camera at your asshole every time you drop your pants.  Everybody in hollywood uses drugs, a half of film industry is permanently high by every drug you can name of. Stars dies by OD's, there is has been Manson's massacre etc., so if star like Polanski slip his dick in the wrong pussy, will that really be so big deal?
   

I read all that and still came to the same conclusion I would had I just looked at your post count.

In other words...you're an idiot.

[kiwiol]

Jesus Christ what a witch hunt. You teen twats are ready to hang that poor idiot for something he has done over 20 years before you were born, without any knowledge what really has happen? Roman was in a party, he was drunk and high, and he met a hot young bitch in there and they have sex. The bitch wasn't any shy little virgin with pony tails and lollipop, she was some kind a party toy who fuck with anyone to get high and no one knows her real age at the moment, she was in every party in town. Roman was famous so the little bitch calculated that there will be some money for her if she go to police, but what a disappointment, Roman runs and didn't pay anything. She got nothing, her party times are over because everybody knows what a under age teen whore she is, and to save that little she has, she gives a interview where she told that she doesn't blame Polanski.  Where is the crime?

Who can say he will do differently when at the party, sizzling hot young girl want to have sex with him. 99,98% of any man who have a some kind of dick, will fuck her and those 00.2% are eunuchs. In USA there is over a million teen pregnancies per year, so Romans mistake is quite common. Youngest of those are 10 years old, so it seem to me that many of you doesn't ask girls age before sex. Only thing which you can blame Polanski, is the fact that he was careless and stupid, but in those times it wasn't big deal. Every one fuck any one at the party, no aids, no paparazzi pushing his camera at your asshole every time you drop your pants.  Everybody in hollywood uses drugs, a half of film industry is permanently high by every drug you can name of. Stars dies by OD's, there is has been Manson's massacre etc., so if star like Polanski slip his dick in the wrong pussy, will that really be so big deal?
   

Hi Roman('s Pole-lover-sky)

[Mobil]

arnolds words are the truth.. this douche bag needs to be raped in prison.

[AVBG]

It's amazing how many people are trying to justify what happened. The fact remains that it did happen regardless if it was 30 odd years ago. I hope when he gets to jail he gets repeatedly fucked in the ass against his will for the next 30 years.

[freespirit]

You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.

The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.

This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.

You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.


If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!

Polanski knew what he did, so he's guilty. Apparently you're not a hypocrite yourself  , so you would have forgiven him the minute after he raped your 13 year old slutty daughter.

[kawaks]

I wonder how many of the tough guys in the thread would think the above scenario was ok if it was their 13 yr old daughter?

Right and if the genders were reversed and it was a 40 year old woman caught "raping" your 13 year old son, I bet you'd be calling him a stud for slaying a cougar ?

[NarcissisticDeity]

You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.

The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.

This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.

You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.


If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!

You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.

I never once said it was oaky for females to have sex with their make students . And the difference is it was consensual Roman drugged and raped this girl , massive difference

The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here

No reason? there are plenty , he broke the law , ran from justice of and that pesky little problem of rape . The victim sued and won an undisclosed amount of  money from Polanski and she once again doesn't want her name in the public spotlight . what gives the Government a right to imprison him? he broke that law. and if that were your daughter I think you would want him to be punished to the fullest extent of the law , myself I would want to bury the guy

This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.

so rape has a statue of limitations? plus the fact he fled instead of facing the charges and dealing with the consequences , he's a fugitive in this country , I would have more respect for the guy if he admitted his crime paid his debt to society and moved on , he didn't and I'm glad he may be paying the price for it . the victim may have forgave him he law hasn't

 

You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.

Hello big difference between rape and consensual sex , it's wrong on all levels , these boys were manipulated by a much older woman even though they agreed , Polanski drugged and raped this girl , rape NON-CONSENSUAL , even if she agreed it's still wrong

If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't

Who cares if he behaved like an angel for the rest of his days? this forgives his debt to society? Roman Polanski is a child rapist and if it were my daughter I would move heaven & earth to make him pay . It's time to pay the piper Roman , I hope you go to jail until you die 

[liberalismo]

No reason? there are plenty , he broke the law , ran from justice of and that pesky little problem of rape . The victim sued and won an undisclosed amount of  money from Polanski and she once again doesn't want her name in the public spotlight . what gives the Government a right to imprison him? he broke that law. and if that were your daughter I think you would want him to be punished to the fullest extent of the law , myself I would want to bury the guy

I don't see a reason here.

so rape has a statue of limitations? plus the fact he fled instead of facing the charges and dealing with the consequences , he's a fugitive in this country , I would have more respect for the guy if he admitted his crime paid his debt to society and moved on , he didn't and I'm glad he may be paying the price for it . the victim may have forgave him he law hasn't

There is no statue of limitations, but the victim is over it and has moved on. What gives YOU the right to think that he should go to jail when the victim herself is over it? Epic presumption.

Hello big difference between rape and consensual sex , it's wrong on all levels , these boys were manipulated by a much older woman even though they agreed , Polanski drugged and raped this girl , rape NON-CONSENSUAL , even if she agreed it's still wrong

Who cares if he behaved like an angel for the rest of his days? this forgives his debt to society? Roman Polanski is a child rapist and if it were my daughter I would move heaven & earth to make him pay . It's time to pay the piper Roman , I hope you go to jail until you die  

That's bad and terrible, but you are wanting to put him in jail for some abstract reason of Justice. Because that is all that is left after the victim her self, now an adult, has moved on and forgiven him and doesn't want him in jail.  There is no "debt to society" apart from perhaps damage done to the girl (which I'm sure is now gone) or money the trial cost.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I don't see a reason here.



There is no statue of limitations, but the victim is over it and has moved on. What gives YOU the right to think that he should go to jail when the victim herself is over it? Epic presumption.


That's bad and terrible, but you are wanting to put him in jail for some abstract reason of Justice. Because that is all that is left after the victim her self, now an adult, has moved on and forgiven him and doesn't want him in jail.  There is no "debt to society" apart from perhaps damage done to the girl (which I'm sure is now gone) or money the trial cost.

I don't see a reason here.

You're just being silly , he broke the law that's reason enough

There is no statue of limitations, but the victim is over it and has moved on. What gives YOU the right to think that he should go to jail when the victim herself is over it? Epic presumption.

no presumption needed , her forgiveness has nothing to do with the law , he's a fugitive from justice , he broke the law and he should pay his debt to society , because he's wealthy and makes great movies somehow means he's above the law? he should go to jail because she's a RAPIST that's why and he hasn't paid his debt to society

That's bad and terrible, but you are wanting to put him in jail for some abstract reason of Justice. Because that is all that is left after the victim her self, now an adult, has moved on and forgiven him and doesn't want him in jail.  There is no "debt to society" apart from perhaps damage done to the girl (which I'm sure is now gone) or money the trial cost.

abstract reason of justice? you're either just being contrary or stupid , he drugged & raped a girl and then fled to avoid doing jail time , he paid her off too . If this were your daughter would you feel the same? there is no debt to society? nonsense he broke the law and should pay the price , you don't wanna go to jail DON'T rape 13 year old girls , simple math . He ran and never paid his debt to society even if he paid off his victim