Author Topic: Arnold Schwarzenegger on Roman Polanski (Read 16935 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #100 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:33:03 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:15:29 PM

This guy is no threat to society. He actually improves society with his work. Putting him away won't fix anything. It won't pay any non-existing debt. It won't do anything good, really.

No one here is arguing that what he did was not terrible. I agree. it was terrible. That's not the point though.

lmfao he improved society

he is a child rapist but he made good movies lmfao

the debt exists the debt of plea deal that he agreed to , stop typing there is no debt you're simply wrong.

liberalismo · « **Reply #101 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:33:59 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2009, 07:23:56 PM

He admitted raping her , case closed. and there is a massive difference between selling pot and drugging & raping a 13 year old girl

Indeed. But the point remains: OTHER things must be considered before you support or oppose someone being put in jail.

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2009, 07:23:56 PM

no real reason? yes you overlooked it ( something you're willing to do ) he admitted quilt and ran , he should be put in jail for both

Why?

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2009, 07:23:56 PM

So if she didn't this would somehow change things? irrelevant if she forgives him , you can't or wont look past your own retarded logic

It would change things. It changes everything.

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2009, 07:23:56 PM

The debt for committing a wrong doing ( felony rape of a minor and a host of other felonies ) breaking multiple laws

The ONLY damage he caused, he has tried to fix and the victim opposes his persecution. So beyond that, what debt is there? Clarify.

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2009, 07:23:56 PM

coming from you that's ironic , either you're being contrary or you're being honest either way it makes you an asshole and please answer the question how would you feel if it were your 13 year old daughter?

If it were my 13 year old daughter and happened now, I'd castrate him.

However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.

clued-up · « **Reply #102 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:36:35 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:33:59 PM

However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.

that is because you're a spineless piece of shit.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #103 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:40:20 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:33:59 PM

Indeed. But the point remains: OTHER things must be considered before you support or oppose someone being put in jail.

Why?

It would change things. It changes everything.

The ONLY damage he caused, he has tried to fix and the victim opposes his persecution. So beyond that, what debt is there? Clarify.

If it were my 13 year old daughter and happened now, I'd castrate him.

However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.

Quote

Indeed. But the point remains: OTHER things must be considered before you support or oppose someone being put in jail.

No they don't , he agreed to a deal he reneged , he still owes everything else is semantics

Quote

Why?

you're just being contrary

Quote

It would change things. It changes everything.

it changes nothing in the eyes of the law

Quote

The ONLY damage he caused, he has tried to fix and the victim opposes his persecution. So beyond that, what debt is there? Clarify.

he didn't try and fix , he ran . he paid her off . the victim's wishes are irrelevant , has absolutely nothing to do with the law , the debt is the deal he agreed to

Quote

If it were my 13 year old daughter and happened now, I'd castrate him.

even if she forgave him? and wish for him to remain intact?

Quote

However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.

easy to say when it hasn't happened to you personally , he made a deal with the law he reneged time to pay the piper

liberalismo · « **Reply #104 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:40:47 PM »

Quote from: james001 on October 03, 2009, 07:36:35 PM

that is because you're a spineless piece of shit.

No. It would be because there would be no reason.

clued-up · « **Reply #105 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:43:10 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:40:47 PM

No. It would be because there would be no reason.

a man rapes your child up the ass… that’s not reason enough for you?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #106 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:43:26 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:40:47 PM

No. It would be because there would be no reason.

reason? plea deal which he didn't hold his end of the bargain that's the reason , he thought if he agreed to a plea he would serve just four years , the judged threatened more he ran instead of facing the music . If he held his part of the deal and served his time and got out and she forgave him and he made movies more power to him NOT what happened .

liberalismo · « **Reply #107 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:50:02 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2009, 07:40:20 PM

No they don't , he agreed to a deal he reneged , he still owes everything else is semantics

you're just being contrary
it changes nothing in the eyes of the law

he didn't try and fix , he ran . he paid her off . the victim's wishes are irrelevant , has absolutely nothing to do with the law , the debt is the deal he agreed to

even if she forgave him? and wish for him to remain intact?

easy to say when it hasn't happened to you personally , he made a deal with the law he reneged time to pay the piper

You aren't answering my questions. You are just restating your original claims.

clued-up · « **Reply #108 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:51:16 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:50:02 PM

You aren't answering my questions. You are just restating your original claims.

do you have a daughter?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #109 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:52:49 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:50:02 PM

You aren't answering my questions. You are just restating your original claims.

Everything you asked has been answered . and I'm just restating the original facts.

liberalismo · « **Reply #110 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:53:14 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2009, 07:30:19 PM

I have no right? fair enough , the law has the right to tell him he admitted to drugging & raping a 13 year old girl , he fled like the coward he is because he wanted to control how much time he was going to get .

The girl was also paid off by Polanski another tidbit you're willing to overlook , she may have forgave him that's irrelevant , I hope he spends the rest of his life in jail

You already admitted that other circumstances must be taken into consideration before persecuting someone for a crime. So you can't go on and say "Well, it's illegal and that is that" because you admit that logic won't work.

clued-up · « **Reply #111 on:** October 03, 2009, 07:57:05 PM »

Its pretty clear that *liberalismo* likes to anally violate young children.

sick fuck.

liberalismo · « **Reply #112 on:** October 03, 2009, 08:03:20 PM »

Quote from: james001 on October 03, 2009, 07:43:10 PM

a man rapes your child up the ass… that’s not reason enough for you?

I'd support what my daughter wanted.

clued-up · « **Reply #113 on:** October 03, 2009, 08:07:41 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 08:03:20 PM

I'd support what my daughter wanted.

as long as the price is right....

you're pathetic.. spineless... a child rapist most likely.

why dont you run along and break a hip or something... you're old, right?

liberalismo · « **Reply #114 on:** October 03, 2009, 08:09:46 PM »

Ok...Obviously I won't get rational answers from the two of you.

clued-up · « **Reply #115 on:** October 03, 2009, 08:25:27 PM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 08:09:46 PM

Ok...Obviously I won't get rational answers from the two of you.

Well, lets see…

This guy gets young child alone.. for a *photo shoot*.. He then drugs her.. gets her boozed up.. and holds her against her will… as he rapes her.. sodomizes her.. and thrusts his dick wherever he wants. He stops raping her to answer the door.. The child scrambles to get her clothes on.. drugged and terrified.. He stops her, takes her clothes back off.. and rapes her up her young ass some more.

You don’t think this guy deserves any jail time.

You are a fucking low life. Get lost.

liberalismo · « **Reply #116 on:** October 04, 2009, 08:28:56 AM »

Quote from: james001 on October 03, 2009, 08:25:27 PM

Well, lets see…

This guy gets young child alone.. for a *photo shoot*.. He then drugs her.. gets her boozed up.. and holds her against her will… as he rapes her.. sodomizes her.. and thrusts his dick wherever he wants. He stops raping her to answer the door.. The child scrambles to get her clothes on.. drugged and terrified.. He stops her, takes her clothes back off.. and rapes her up her young ass some more.

You don’t think this guy deserves any jail time.

You are a fucking low life. Get lost.

"Deserves" jail time? That doesn't even make sense. Since when did we put people in jail because they "deserved" it? There are plenty of people who belong in jail who deserve it but are free, and plenty of people who are in jail who do not deserve it. So "deserving" to go to jail isn't a justified reason to send someone to jail, because it is inconsistent.

I've already refuted the "debt to society" nonsense.

The only reasons to put him in jail are now gone. The victim doesn't want him in jail. The fact that you do is irrelevant to me. If the victim wanted him in Jail then I'd support it. She doesn't so I don't.

Mars · « **Reply #117 on:** October 04, 2009, 08:49:08 AM »

what did she wanted more. getting fucked by a great director in the ass. in the house of great actor Jack Niccolson! what girl wouldnt want that.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #118 on:** October 04, 2009, 08:55:12 AM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 04, 2009, 08:28:56 AM

"Deserves" jail time? That doesn't even make sense. Since when did we put people in jail because they "deserved" it? There are plenty of people who belong in jail who deserve it but are free, and plenty of people who are in jail who do not deserve it. So "deserving" to go to jail isn't a justified reason to send someone to jail, because it is inconsistent.

I've already refuted the "debt to society" nonsense.

The only reasons to put him in jail are now gone. The victim doesn't want him in jail. The fact that you do is irrelevant to me. If the victim wanted him in Jail then I'd support it. She doesn't so I don't.

You didn't refute anything ....he made a plea deal he reneged , he owes the state jail time . case closed.

dr.chimps · « **Reply #119 on:** October 04, 2009, 09:08:54 AM »

Quote from: liberalismo on October 03, 2009, 07:13:47 PM

Plenty of Jews have forgiven their Nazi persecutors.

So!? What the fark does that have to do with Nazi war crimes? You're just trolling at this point.

kiwiol · « **Reply #120 on:** October 04, 2009, 09:09:15 AM »

Quote from: Mars on October 04, 2009, 08:49:08 AM

what did she wanted more. getting fucked by a great director in the ass. in the house of great actor Jack Niccolson! what girl wouldnt want that.

Are you saying children are the orgasm of life, Mars?

dr.chimps · « **Reply #121 on:** October 04, 2009, 09:12:55 AM »

Quote from: Mars on October 04, 2009, 08:49:08 AM

what did she wanted more. getting fucked by a great director in the ass. in the house of great actor Jack Niccolson! what girl wouldnt want that.

Roman: 'Uh, Jack, can I use your house while you're on location?'

Jack: 'Sure, Roman. Knock yourself out.' *Thinks to himself: 'What's the worst that could happen?'*

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #122 on:** October 04, 2009, 09:14:35 AM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on October 04, 2009, 09:08:54 AM

So!? What the fark does that have to do with Nazi war crimes? You're just trolling at this point.

He is , and he's being contrary

liberalismo · « **Reply #123 on:** October 04, 2009, 11:17:23 AM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on October 04, 2009, 09:08:54 AM

So!? What the fark does that have to do with Nazi war crimes? You're just trolling at this point.

This is getbig, and you're calling someone a troll?

Fury · « **Reply #124 on:** October 04, 2009, 11:39:21 AM »

He fled the country instead of doing jail time. Why reward someone for skipping town and avoiding the repercussions of their actions? Pretty cut and dry.