I don't know where you got this hairbrained lie from. The host cities for the Olympics ALWAYS end up BILLIONS of dollars in debt afterward
http://www.forbes.com/2006/02/08/host-city-olympics_cx_tvr_0208olympiccity.htmlDoes it pay to host the world's biggest party? It depends on whether your house is already big enough, or if you need to scramble and spend to add on.
When it comes to the Olympics, host cities around the world typically spend billions on venues, infrastructure, security and other assorted necessities for the privilege of bringing in tens of thousands of guests for 17 days.
Beijing is set to smash the spending record for the 2008 games by budgeting $23 billion, nearly twice what Athens laid out two years ago.
For many host cities, the curse has overshadowed the blessing. At least four (Sydney, Montreal, Barcelona and Athens) are still paying off debt taken on to finance the games, due mainly to splurging on sports venues that don't have much after life. While Atlanta's Turner Field is now home to baseball's Braves, Sydney's SuperDome, has plunged into receivership.
Sydney taxpayers shell out $100 million annually for upkeep on a new rail system that hasn't been heavily used since the 2000 Olympics, while Barcelona is populated with a host of arenas left over from 1992 that now sit mostly empty. Athens, meanwhile, laid out $12 billion to bring the Games "back to their roots" in 2004, a whopping 5% of Greece's GDP. Upkeep on venues built for baseball, basketball and other sports carries a $100 million annual price tag, and a $144 million sailing facility now goes mostly unused.