Author Topic: Most overrated Mr Olympia? (Read 37924 times)

bigbobs · « **Reply #75 on:** October 06, 2009, 02:24:47 PM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on October 05, 2009, 11:05:51 PM

and how you see dorian better than nasser in this pic.??.. dont you think that dorian's quads need more separation here?.. dont they look small beside nasser's??.. dont you see how weak and small his arms here, not because he is beside nasser but even if you look at him separately.. dont you see how nasser's abs is much better???.. how nasser's chest is thicker?!.............. is dorian's balls the only thing you can see

ND only sees whatever the judges want him to see. If the judges had Nasser in 1st, he would be saying Nasser was better in 97.

Quote from: Royal Lion on October 06, 2009, 01:49:26 PM

This picture clearly shows the difference in conditioning between Nasser and Dorian.

How so?

Hulkster · « **Reply #76 on:** October 06, 2009, 02:26:06 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 06, 2009, 02:09:37 PM

9th place

and this is a crappy physique? well compared to Dorian

yup. its crappy.

crappy compared to what he looked like in 98/99 with a lot more size and much better conditioning..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #77 on:** October 06, 2009, 02:27:29 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 06, 2009, 02:26:06 PM

yup. its crappy.

crappy compared to what he looked like in 98/99 with a lot more size and much better conditioning..

Oh so now you're forced to amend your statement

crappy compared to an even crappier Yates an uninjured Dorian would leave him for dead

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #78 on:** October 06, 2009, 02:31:23 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on October 06, 2009, 02:24:47 PM

ND only sees whatever the judges want him to see. If the judges had Nasser in 1st, he would be saying Nasser was better in 97.

How so?

And you only see with Nasser's eyes which are delusional , the guy still thinks he placed third in 1996

the judges are wrong when Nasser loses and right when he wins , same tired spiel

Nasser = not good enough

Hulkster · « **Reply #79 on:** October 06, 2009, 02:31:31 PM »

when was the last time dorian was uninjured, oh yeah, way back in 1993 thanks to his great training techniques LOL

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #80 on:** October 06, 2009, 02:36:14 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 06, 2009, 02:31:31 PM

when was the last time dorian was uninjured, oh yeah, way back in 1993 thanks to his great training techniques LOL

Who cares . Dorian uninjured would leave ANY Ronnie Coleman for dead , he beat an injured Ronnie for years

Dorian at 269 pounds would trampled Coleman he's to big , to complete , to conditioned , to balanced Ronnie would be humbled real quick

Hulkster · « **Reply #81 on:** October 06, 2009, 03:16:21 PM »

Quote

Dorian uninjured would leave ANY Ronnie Coleman for dead

LOL hell no: his best pose in his best ever shape still gets beat:

way more detail, better shape, smaller waist, equally thick lats etc.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #82 on:** October 06, 2009, 03:23:28 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 06, 2009, 03:16:21 PM

LOL hell no: his best pose in his best ever shape still gets beat:

way more detail, better shape, smaller waist, equally thick lats etc.

You keep typing this and absolutely NO agrees with you , Dorian's front latspread has been dubbed devastating Ronnie can even do it properly $:-\$

equally thick lats? oh boy

not even close , Dorian just kills Ronnie on lats better shape , sweep , thickness , detail it's not even close

and typical Hulkster omit the judging criteria that Dorian kills him on like density & dryness , balance & proportion , and that's not even including the other mandatory poses

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #83 on:** October 06, 2009, 03:31:18 PM »

The difference between lats is staggering , Dorians are wider , take up much more space between his arms , have better sweep , and a hell of a lot more detail

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #84 on:** October 06, 2009, 03:34:32 PM »

No one matches these lats

Hulkster · « **Reply #85 on:** October 06, 2009, 03:51:40 PM »

Quote

take up much more space between his arms

not hard to do when you have no arms or bis to speak of... $:-\$

look at this domination of dorian:

ronnie makes it look like he doesn't even train his arms or even diet.

the difference in whole body detail is that staggering..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #86 on:** October 06, 2009, 03:54:06 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 06, 2009, 03:51:40 PM

not hard to do when you have no arms or bis to speak of... $:-\$

look at this domination of dorian:

Backfire , Dorian kills him , much better lats on Yates much better pose , more balanced harder , drier more complete

BuffD · « **Reply #87 on:** October 06, 2009, 04:59:49 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 06, 2009, 03:51:40 PM

not hard to do when you have no arms or bis to speak of... $:-\$

look at this domination of dorian:

ronnie makes it look like he doesn't even train his arms or even diet.

the difference in whole body detail is that staggering..

Actually if you have no arms and there is less space between your lats and your arms then that would mean your lats have to be much bigger so try again their schmoe boy.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #88 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:04:50 PM »

Quote from: BuffD on October 06, 2009, 04:59:49 PM

Actually if you have no arms and there is less space between your lats and your arms then that would mean your lats have to be much bigger so try again their schmoe boy.

lmfao poor Hulkster the kid is not that bright

kiwiol · « **Reply #89 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:05:08 PM »

Quote from: BuffD on October 06, 2009, 04:59:49 PM

Actually if you have no arms and there is less space between your lats and your arms then that would mean your lats have to be much bigger so try again their schmoe boy.

Facts and logic - two things that seldom work in favor of Hulkster and never, when he is talking about Dorian Yates

Hulkster · « **Reply #90 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:23:19 PM »

Quote from: BuffD on October 06, 2009, 04:59:49 PM

Actually if you have no arms and there is less space between your lats and your arms then that would mean your lats have to be much bigger so try again their schmoe boy.

wrong.

because ronnie has these muscles that dorian lacked called BICEPS and they literally hang in the way of his lats, obstructing the upper portion by his armpits.

you can see it all the time in ronnie lat spreads. less of his lats are visible as a result.

dorian does not have this problem because he has the worst arms of any Mr. Olympia since 1965.. $:-\$ so his lats appear a little thicker as a result.

the combo of dorian's thick lats and tiny arms is nothing new. fans all over have been speaking about this for years. his lat spread is nothing but lats, and piss poor everything else, except for calves of course..

regmac · « **Reply #91 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:26:22 PM »

Quote from: Determinator on October 04, 2009, 07:03:42 AM

My vote: Lee haney.

BULL Sugar Honey Ice Tea!!!!!!!!!!!! but it IS your opinion.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #92 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:29:49 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on October 06, 2009, 02:21:02 PM

Hey pumpster you're back

regmac · « **Reply #93 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:33:04 PM »

No such thing of an overratted Mr. O!!!!!

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #94 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:37:23 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 06, 2009, 05:23:19 PM

wrong.

because ronnie has these muscles that dorian lacked called BICEPS and they literally hang in the way of his lats, obstructing the upper portion by his armpits.

you can see it all the time in ronnie lat spreads. less of his lats are visible as a result.

dorian does not have this problem because he has the worst arms of any Mr. Olympia since 1965.. $:-\$ so his lats appear a little thicker as a result.

the combo of dorian's thick lats and tiny arms is nothing new. fans all over have been speaking about this for years. his lat spread is nothing but lats, and piss poor everything else, except for calves of course..

Either Ronnie has some high powered spot lights shining on him, or that pic has been sharpened. Hmmm, wonder how that could that have happened?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #95 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:40:48 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 06, 2009, 05:23:19 PM

wrong.

because ronnie has these muscles that dorian lacked called BICEPS and they literally hang in the way of his lats, obstructing the upper portion by his armpits.

you can see it all the time in ronnie lat spreads. less of his lats are visible as a result.

dorian does not have this problem because he has the worst arms of any Mr. Olympia since 1965.. $:-\$ so his lats appear a little thicker as a result.

the combo of dorian's thick lats and tiny arms is nothing new. fans all over have been speaking about this for years. his lat spread is nothing but lats, and piss poor everything else, except for calves of course..

If that pic isn't way oversharpened

Flex Magazine June 2002

The lat spread that stunned and revolutionized the bodybuilding world. It is jumbo-jet wide with giant slabs of rock-hard muscle knitted together with gnarly detail. Even in this front shot, you can see the immensity of the billowing lats -- particularly the one on the right, which, amazingly, casts a terrifying shadow.

Why can you never find quotes like this about Ronnie?

if you say his is better why ?

All things considered Dorian's front latspread is just leaps & bounds better from head to toe

http://www.learn-bodybuilding.com/posing_front_lat_spread.aspx

read this article and why Ronnie's doesn't compare , learn what I mean when I tell you Ronnie & Nasser don't hit the pose properly combine that with the fact Dorian kills him in density & dryness , balance & proportion , completeness , sweep of lats thickness etc

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #96 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:42:30 PM »

Quote from: Mr.1derful on October 06, 2009, 05:37:23 PM

Either Ronnie has some high powered spot lights shining on him, or that pic has been sharpened. Hmmm, wonder how that could that have happened?

Hahahaha great minds !

He posts sharpened pics constantly to prove his ' point '

kiwiol · « **Reply #97 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:43:26 PM »

Quote from: Mr.1derful on October 06, 2009, 05:37:23 PM

Either Ronnie has some high powered spot lights shining on him, or that pic has been sharpened. Hmmm, wonder how that could that have happened?

Are you saying that if Hulkster sharpened his pics any more, the side-triceps shot of the 1st callout in the Mr Olympia 99 would look like this?

Just trolling, Hulkster

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #98 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:45:45 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on October 06, 2009, 05:43:26 PM

Are you saying that if Hulkster sharpened his pics any more, the side-triceps shot of the 1st callout in the Mr Olympia 99 would look like this?

Just trolling, Hulkster

lmfao

someone needs to teach Hulkster the difference

Hulkster one of these pics are sharpened and one isn't guess which one

Hulkster · « **Reply #99 on:** October 06, 2009, 05:52:56 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 06, 2009, 05:42:30 PM

Hahahaha great minds !

He posts sharpened pics constantly to prove his ' point '

I have never sharpened anything.

you will find the pic here:

http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/coleman.html