Author Topic: Tren A vs Tren E  (Read 4878 times)

Kentucky_cowboy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 248
  • Team Lean Face
Tren A vs Tren E
« on: October 13, 2009, 12:02:11 AM »
What's your preference?

If I can chose to take 100 mg of Tren Acetate EOD vs. 200 mg of Tren Enanthate every fourth day?  Total mg's is the same, so unless there is some other factor I would prefer using Tren Enanthate as it means less frequent poking.  Is there any advantage to taking tren acetate over enanthate?

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2009, 12:07:11 AM »
Tren-a in my experience seems to work better...not massively or anything but there is a slight noticeable difference.

Kentucky_cowboy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 248
  • Team Lean Face
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2009, 12:30:01 AM »
Tren-a in my experience seems to work better...not massively or anything but there is a slight noticeable difference.

Interesting, do you usually find short esters work better than longer ones?  For example do you find test propionate works better than test enanthate? 

Honest question, just trying to get my head around this.

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2009, 12:36:41 AM »
Interesting, do you usually find short esters work better than longer ones?  For example do you find test propionate works better than test enanthate? 

Honest question, just trying to get my head around this.

No, not necessarily. I actually prefer test-e over any other testosterone.

claymore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2916
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2009, 12:45:10 AM »
What's your preference?

If I can chose to take 100 mg of Tren Acetate EOD vs. 200 mg of Tren Enanthate every fourth day?  Total mg's is the same, so unless there is some other factor I would prefer using Tren Enanthate as it means less frequent poking.  Is there any advantage to taking tren acetate over enanthate?

Go with the acetate

Schmoe Buster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4515
  • Unnatural Bodybuilder
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2009, 02:36:52 AM »
How about Parabolan? i just bought some and wondering what opinions are about it compared to Tren-A and Tren-E
Thunderdome approved

Kentucky_cowboy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 248
  • Team Lean Face
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2009, 09:13:43 AM »
Go with the acetate

I guess my question is also why is one better than the other.  Does it make sense?  Perhaps thombz can chime in on this?

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2009, 10:00:04 AM »
I guess my question is also why is one better than the other.  Does it make sense?  Perhaps thombz can chime in on this?

MG for MG, tren-a is stronger, not by much but it is stronger.

Second, if you've never used tren before, always use tren-a the first time. IF you have bad side effects, which a lot of guys do, then you can stop use and it clears out of your system very quickly. Take tren-e and have these effects and you'll be dealing with them for several days.

Anyway, not being a jackass here, this is just something I've never understood. People complain about having to inject a few times a wk, a couple times a wk they're fin but 3 or 4 and they act like they're digging a 70ft ditch. I guess I just don't get what the big deal is, an injection of whatever takes all of about 5 seconds.

Kentucky_cowboy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 248
  • Team Lean Face
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2009, 10:16:58 AM »
MG for MG, tren-a is stronger, not by much but it is stronger.

Second, if you've never used tren before, always use tren-a the first time. IF you have bad side effects, which a lot of guys do, then you can stop use and it clears out of your system very quickly. Take tren-e and have these effects and you'll be dealing with them for several days.

Anyway, not being a jackass here, this is just something I've never understood. People complain about having to inject a few times a wk, a couple times a wk they're fin but 3 or 4 and they act like they're digging a 70ft ditch. I guess I just don't get what the big deal is, an injection of whatever takes all of about 5 seconds.

No problem.  I don't mind injecting a few times a week, 3-4 times would be the absolute most I'd want to do, but if I can get away with twice a week instead of 3-4 times I'd prefer that, all else being equal of course.  So my question arose since I was assuming all else to be equal between tren a and tren e. 

I've only pinned in the delt, thigh or glute.  I find the glute a bit awkward to stretch back towards, the delt is probably my favourite except it can sometimes hurt if I'm injecting 3 cc's, and the thigh is okay, but I find especially my left thigh seems to build up lumps and scar tissue easily, even if I wait a week sometimes before re-using the same site.  Sometimes if I pierce the scar tissue it really hurts and leaves me caughing frantically afterwards.

For less pain, lumps, scar tissue and bleeding I prefer  less frequent injections whenever possible.

Also, another way of looking at is with tren enanthate you can inject  EOD as well and have more stable  blood levels than tren acetate EOD - I heard some people recommend tren acetate should be shot once a day and not even EOD?

4thAD

  • Guest
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2009, 10:27:20 AM »
Def tren a for me. Why wait 4-6 weeks for the e to kick in when you can run the acetate ester and have very fast results. People dont typically run tren much more than 10 weeks or so in a singel run, so just get the most out of it.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2009, 01:37:49 PM »
I guess my question is also why is one better than the other.  Does it make sense?  Perhaps thombz can chime in on this?
the longer the ester, the more space it takes up, and the less room for actual hormone. tren acetate has less ester, and more hormone than tren enanthate. its a small difference, like 10mg difference for every 100mg.

Kentucky_cowboy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 248
  • Team Lean Face
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2009, 02:26:20 PM »
the longer the ester, the more space it takes up, and the less room for actual hormone. tren acetate has less ester, and more hormone than tren enanthate. its a small difference, like 10mg difference for every 100mg.

So to get the same results as 300 mg of tren acetate a week, one should take a bit more than 300 g of tren enanthate?  Also, what about the fact that the tren enanthate stays in your system longer - would this mean the hormone level under enanthate may be higher after some weeks? 

I know you recommend more frequent injections for stable blood levels, so if the only options are EOD shots of tren acetate vs EOD shots of tren enanthate, what would you recommend?  (dosage can be adjusted)

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2009, 02:40:36 PM »
So to get the same results as 300 mg of tren acetate a week, one should take a bit more than 300 g of tren enanthate?  Also, what about the fact that the tren enanthate stays in your system longer - would this mean the hormone level under enanthate may be higher after some weeks? 

I know you recommend more frequent injections for stable blood levels, so if the only options are EOD shots of tren acetate vs EOD shots of tren enanthate, what would you recommend?  (dosage can be adjusted)

 i would do every other day of tren enanthate, as opposed to every other day of tren acetate. but id rather use tren acetate everyday.

yes, 300mg of tren a would yeild a little better result than 300mg of tren enan...because thats 300mg including ester weight, so you actually have a bit more actual trenbolone with the acetate.

the fact that tren enanthate stays in your system longer is due to the ester, not the hormone. the hormone itself it metabolised just as quickly as acetate, because both end up being trenbolone with no ester.  the levels of enanthate start a bit lower than they should be, then gradulaly rise up to the peak. so the "build up" doesnt mean higher levels in the end.

The ChemistV2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2008
Re: Tren A vs Tren E
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2009, 02:58:11 PM »
How about Parabolan? i just bought some and wondering what opinions are about it compared to Tren-A and Tren-E
True Parabolan has been off the market for years. Much better than the filtered Cow pellets that most people use.