Author Topic: Phil who?  (Read 4662 times)

Determinator

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2009, 06:01:12 AM »
I can understand your frustration.  I'd feel the same way if I were wrong. 

Indeed, genetically poor intelligence inherited from your parents, is rather sad. Here's to your *great* education that you have mustered.

rocket

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10727
  • Not a champion
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2009, 06:07:45 AM »
Three posts avoiding the subject and striking out with harmless intellectual barbs.  It's a meltdown.

Determinator

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #27 on: October 13, 2009, 06:49:54 AM »
Three posts avoiding the subject and striking out with harmless intellectual barbs.  It's a meltdown.

Indeed. A meldown. Have a good look at your parents tonight. It is entirely their fault.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #28 on: October 13, 2009, 06:53:12 AM »
Indeed. A meldown. Have a good look at your parents tonight. It is entirely their fault.

haha, youre such a tool, whats up with you commenting on other guys parents?

you were commenting on mine too the other day.

Did your father beat and raped you or youre an orphan?

obsessed fuck.


Determinator

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #29 on: October 13, 2009, 06:55:19 AM »
haha, youre such a tool, whats up with you commenting on other guys parents?

you were commenting on mine too the other day.

Did your father beat and raped you or youre an orphan?

obsessed fuck.



Meso again. Typically class intellectual comment.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2009, 06:58:45 AM »
Meso again. Typically class intellectual comment.
blah blah blah  ::)

Determinator

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #31 on: October 13, 2009, 06:59:03 AM »

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #32 on: October 13, 2009, 07:03:05 AM »
Indeed.
blah blah blah talk like a puppet, full of negativity.

Determinator

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #33 on: October 13, 2009, 07:06:17 AM »
blah blah blah talk like a puppet, full of negativity.

Explain, if you can manage it, how i am (allegedly) "full of negativity." There is really no point in apportioning the blame for your being; with me or others. As stated, that responsibility lies with you parents for bequeathing you with your dubious 'brain' genetics.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #34 on: October 13, 2009, 07:12:20 AM »
Explain, if you can manage it, how i am (allegedly) "full of negativity." There is really no point in apportioning the blame for your being; with me or others. As stated, that responsibility lies with you parents for bequeathing you with your dubious 'brain' genetics.

Youre really a fool aren't you? And youre in your 30's right?

Maybe if you can "manage" it, we can talk in MY language - Greek - but since Greek language takes A LOT effort and brains to speak, i doubt you can.

Anyway.


Determinator

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #35 on: October 13, 2009, 07:17:38 AM »
Youre really a fool aren't you? And youre in your 30's right?

Maybe if you can "manage" it, we can talk in MY language - Greek - but since Greek language takes A LOT effort and brains to speak, i doubt you can.

Anyway.



Yet another classy reply from meso. Indeed, from the person who alledged the recipient of 'negativity.' We note the 'negative' tone of your *classy* reply.
Typical meso, typical reply, typical exposure of sub intellect-and we all know who is to blame for that particular shortcoming of yours, eh.

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #36 on: October 13, 2009, 07:58:08 AM »
Wow Jay has made a lot of improvements. He looks awesome.
from incomplete data

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #37 on: October 13, 2009, 08:02:49 AM »
Wow Jay has made a lot of improvements. He looks awesome.
first time i see striations on his chest

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #38 on: October 13, 2009, 09:41:06 AM »
I've seen Kevin and Heath in person.  Kevin much wider than Heath.  Kevin is not Jay Cutler wide but wide enough.
7

Nasty Nate

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #39 on: October 13, 2009, 09:54:23 AM »
 :) ... This man has the delts, the arms, AND the chest

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22045
  • #EarlToo
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #40 on: October 13, 2009, 04:16:18 PM »
Gool ole' Mr. narrow there. So overrated it is unreal.

overrated? so who should've beaten him?

i asked you this before and you never answered, which makes me think you don't know what the word "overrated" means and have a vendetta against the one and only Mr. Levrone

THANKS FOR THE AWESOME PICS MATT

MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!

 8) 8) 8)


E
E

wikkedonez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1546
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #41 on: October 13, 2009, 04:27:08 PM »
Levrone will be that size again in about 3 weeks.

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #42 on: October 13, 2009, 04:34:35 PM »
Levrone will be that size again in about 3 weeks.

Earl1972's ejaculation mechanism can barely wait!
from incomplete data

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22045
  • #EarlToo
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #43 on: October 13, 2009, 04:50:00 PM »
Earl1972's ejaculation mechanism can barely wait!

why are you thinking of me ejaculating ???

E
E

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #44 on: October 13, 2009, 04:59:47 PM »
.

Nasty Nate

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #45 on: October 13, 2009, 07:10:47 PM »
Maryland Muscle Machine... babay.

Determinator

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #46 on: October 14, 2009, 03:42:54 AM »
overrated? so who should've beaten him?

i asked you this before and you never answered, which makes me think you don't know what the word "overrated" means and have a vendetta against the one and only Mr. Levrone

THANKS FOR THE AWESOME PICS MATT

MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!
MARYLAND MUSCLE MACHINE!

 8) 8) 8)


E

Overrated as:

Narrower than heath (which is saying something)

So-so conditioning

The classic trying to componsate for narrowness by growing disproportionate delts.

Weak chest and sub par legs....the list goes on

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #47 on: October 14, 2009, 07:04:23 AM »
Overrated as:

Narrower than heath (which is saying something)

So-so conditioning

The classic trying to componsate for narrowness by growing disproportionate delts.

Weak chest and sub par legs....the list goes on

how do you know Kevin is narrower than Heath?  ???
Considering Levrone in 1999 was 252 pounds compared to Heath who was around 235-240 at this years Olympia, add in that Levrone is slightly taller than Heath also.

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22045
  • #EarlToo
Re: Phil who?
« Reply #48 on: October 14, 2009, 11:12:46 AM »
Overrated as:

Narrower than heath (which is saying something)

So-so conditioning

The classic trying to componsate for narrowness by growing disproportionate delts.

Weak chest and sub par legs....the list goes on

all bodybuilders have weak points and he is not more narrow than heath

how many times do i have to ask you this

WHO SHOULD'VE PLACED AHEAD OF HIM!!

if you can't think of anybody (clearly you can't because you always dodge the question) than he isn't overrated, not even in your simple mind ::)


E

E