Author Topic: 2009 Jay Cutler VS 1995 Dorian Yates !! (Read 29126 times)

Army of One · « **Reply #75 on:** October 16, 2009, 08:51:19 AM »

Quote from: kiwiol on October 16, 2009, 08:45:28 AM

Are you saying that from some "angles", bodybuilding has an aspect of gayness to it, db?

The thought never crossed my mind

kiwiol · « **Reply #76 on:** October 16, 2009, 09:04:20 AM »

Quote from: db2431 on October 16, 2009, 08:51:19 AM

The thought never crossed my mind

Hahaha seriously though, haven't you competed? I thought that pic you posted ages ago doing a rear-double bi was really you - I knew you were joking when you posted the pics of the twinks by car and saying it was you and your mates, lol.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #77 on:** October 16, 2009, 10:04:34 AM »

You people are all fucking crazy. I don't know what you're seeing. Jay looks like utter shit as usual. He actually looked much better in 2006 from my perspective. To have the audacity and temerity of even comparing him to Dorian Yates is of a stupidity that defies comprehension. I am completely fleibergeisted that this thread was even created. I just don't get it.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster · « **Reply #78 on:** October 16, 2009, 02:19:23 PM »

Quote

Jay was ripped and much bigger. Jay now has no weak points.

so, arms, delts and pecs with NO DETAIL are 'ripped with no weakpoints'?

man, we all know you have been melting down lately, but fuck, your turning into an idiot.. $:-\$

affeman · « **Reply #79 on:** October 16, 2009, 02:21:18 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 02:19:23 PM

so, arms, delts and pecs with NO DETAIL are 'ripped with no weakpoints'?

man, we all know you have been melting down lately, but fuck, your turning into an idiot.. $:-\$

You do realize that the 2nd pic is sharpened and in black and white, right?LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #80 on:** October 16, 2009, 02:24:32 PM »

you do realize that jay sucks compared to a peak ronnie, right?

affeman · « **Reply #81 on:** October 16, 2009, 02:26:17 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 02:24:32 PM

you do realize that jay sucks compared to a peak ronnie, right?

You can't tell, you have to see them side by side.

With the lightning of the British GP probably even Jay had vascularity lol.

Royalty · « **Reply #82 on:** October 16, 2009, 03:34:27 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 02:19:23 PM

so, arms, delts and pecs with NO DETAIL are 'ripped with no weakpoints'?

man, we all know you have been melting down lately, but fuck, your turning into an idiot.. $:-\$

me requesting that you stop being creepy and obsessing over decade old pics of Ronnie is not a meltdown.
It's what many people here have asked on multiple occasions. You fail to get the point.

Jay has no real weak points...he had perfect scores at the Olympia. 95% of the people at getbig feel he deserved the perfect scores and the Olympia win.

Hulkster · « **Reply #83 on:** October 16, 2009, 04:23:24 PM »

Quote

Jay has no real weak points...

he has lots of weakpoints when compared to someone with a decent physique:

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #84 on:** October 16, 2009, 04:29:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 04:23:24 PM

he has lots of weakpoints when compared to someone with a decent physique:

Reality check, Shawn had weak points too. Frankly, Jay would wipe the floor with him.

Hulkster · « **Reply #85 on:** October 16, 2009, 04:40:04 PM »

yeah sure:

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #86 on:** October 16, 2009, 04:42:18 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 04:40:04 PM

yeah sure:

Where was Shawn in 2001? Run along now.

affeman · « **Reply #87 on:** October 16, 2009, 04:44:15 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 04:40:04 PM

yeah sure:

Gosh, stand them side by side Hulkster.

That's like the people posting pics of Lee Priest showing that he had the best arms ever. Stand him next to Coleman and he still looks like a midget.

Hulkster · « **Reply #88 on:** October 16, 2009, 04:47:14 PM »

no question Jay is bigger.

but not better. thats the point.

the quality difference between them is waaay too great.

shawn routinely beat guys bigger than him, so this would be a normal occurance.

Danimal77 · « **Reply #89 on:** October 16, 2009, 05:17:08 PM »

Quote from: Mr.1derful on October 16, 2009, 04:29:37 PM

Reality check, Shawn had weak points too. Frankly, Jay would wipe the floor with him.

Shawn's weak point was DORIAN YATES.

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #90 on:** October 16, 2009, 06:09:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 04:47:14 PM

no question Jay is bigger.

but not better. thats the point.

the quality difference between them is waaay too great.

shawn routinely beat guys bigger than him, so this would be a normal occurance.

Shawn didn't beat him in 2001 though, did he? It may have been a normal occurrence in some instances, but it would not be with Jay. Are you suggesting that Shawn would have won this years O? If so, you're even more out of touch with reality than originally thought. And that's really saying something.

Royalty · « **Reply #91 on:** October 16, 2009, 07:10:59 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 04:40:04 PM

yeah sure:

I don't know what you think you are looking at in those rear double bicep pics, but Jay is beating Shawn in your pics (as is Heath and Kai). Shawn took 4th at the 1995 Olympia....and wouldve been at best 6th at the 2009 event.

wannabebig5 · « **Reply #92 on:** October 16, 2009, 07:12:42 PM »

damn you guys on here have some serious patience. i hardly ever post, i cruise on here and even i want to melt down at hulkster. hey hulkster you are a fing idiot. dude jays my favorite bodybuilder and even i know ronnie was better than him (not in 2001 though), but damn post some equal fucking pics man damn. everyone looked badass with the 99 gp lighting. post some normal ronnie pics that arent so damned sharpened all you can see his arms and shoulders, his waist is gone the pics are so dark. fuck stop being retarded. everyone will be able to see ronnie is better and you dont even have to be an idiot about it! alright meltdown complete, glad i could get that off my chest. wait one more thing... hulkster you are..... a fucking idiot haha!!!!!!!!

Royal Lion · « **Reply #93 on:** October 16, 2009, 07:48:13 PM »

Quote from: wannabebig5 on October 16, 2009, 07:12:42 PM

damn you guys on here have some serious patience. i hardly ever post, i cruise on here and even i want to melt down at hulkster. hey hulkster you are a fing idiot. dude jays my favorite bodybuilder and even i know ronnie was better than him (not in 2001 though), but damn post some equal fucking pics man damn. everyone looked badass with the 99 gp lighting. post some normal ronnie pics that arent so damned sharpened all you can see his arms and shoulders, his waist is gone the pics are so dark. fuck stop being retarded. everyone will be able to see ronnie is better and you dont even have to be an idiot about it! alright meltdown complete, glad i could get that off my chest. wait one more thing... hulkster you are..... a fucking idiot haha!!!!!!!!

Hit the nail on the head with that one! Hulkster is pathetic, so pathetic that the only way he can prove his bullshit claims is by posting sharpened pics of Ronnie against the worst pics he can find of Dorian or Jay (he'll say we're just making excuses). It gets old, and quite frankly he has lost whatever credibility he ever had as far as I am concerned. He is far more obsessed and delusional than the Nasser fans--at least they can give credit where credit is due.

I think Ronnie is probably the freakiest bodybuilder ever; however, I think Dorian would give him a run for his money, and so would Jay in his 2009 form. Great shot of Jay in the front relaxed there...the only weakness I see is his leg imbalance. Nonetheless, his win was awesome and he deserved straight firsts.

Hulkster · « **Reply #94 on:** October 16, 2009, 07:50:49 PM »

Quote from: Royalty on October 16, 2009, 07:10:59 PM

I don't know what you think you are looking at in those rear double bicep pics, but Jay is beating Shawn in your pics (as is Heath and Kai). Shawn took 4th at the 1995 Olympia....and wouldve been at best 6th at the 2009 event.

your slipping with your meltdowns Royalty. your judgement is going out the window:

Royal Lion · « **Reply #95 on:** October 16, 2009, 07:56:21 PM »

Ray would get dwarfed by Cutler, just like he is did in 2001, and just like he did by Dorian.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #96 on:** October 16, 2009, 08:15:17 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 04:23:24 PM

he has lots of weakpoints when compared to someone with a decent physique:

alnassak · « **Reply #97 on:** October 16, 2009, 11:37:40 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on October 14, 2009, 07:05:33 PM

Only good post in the entire thread. I haven't posted in this thrad because it so retarded that it defines description. Jay at his best would definitely give Dorian a run for his money...against Dorian at his worst. So yes, Jay 09 vs Dorian 94' would be a good show. As for Jay 09 vs Dorian 95', it would be like watching a giant trollish caveman raping an albino girl with Down's Syndrome. The very comparison is so retarded that it is beyond me.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

johnny1 · « **Reply #98 on:** October 17, 2009, 01:34:57 AM »

Obviously Dorian would not outmass Jay, however his trademark conditioning would on a 1995 stage more than likely would see him (Dorian) come out on top, on a 2009 stage well...who knows...if the judges are (in 2009) looking for the "biggest guy" in good condition over a slightly smaller guy with Superior conditioning/tie-ins/detail etc...well Jay in 2009 could get the vote, a 1993 version of Dorian IMO is a different story, however a 1995 version on a 2009 stage is a little more uncertain

Royalty · « **Reply #99 on:** October 17, 2009, 04:47:39 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 16, 2009, 07:50:49 PM

your slipping with your meltdowns Royalty. your judgement is going out the window:

Hulkster Shawn Ray was narrower than Phil Heath is now....and that flaw on Heath stands out now. Shawn wouldn't be able to beat 5th place Phil Heath. Phil is just too big...too round. So if Phil was 5th, Shawn wouldve been no netter than 6th.