You're all over the place here dude. Are we talking about more replies, or more views?
Both. How can you explain that, out of hundreds of threads, most of them of heterosexual content, the few ones with homosexual content would get a lot more views and replies than the several heterosexual ones, if not because there is a mucher greater interest in gay content than straight content.
Beacuse I already gave you an argument for why more views does not mean more registered getbiggers are viewing the thread.
Your argument is stupid, frankly. So a bunch of people who don't post here would come here just to browse through the few gay threads? What are the odds of that? So they typed on google "gay" and were directed to Getbig's 2 or 3 gay threads and not the millions of gay porn sites available? We are talking thousands of people here. Occam razor dictates that most of the viewers are members of this board, because it is a far more likely explanation than the alternative. It's called common sense. And it doesen't matter anyway, because even if most people browsing through those threads were guestsm it stil doesen't change the fact that Bay's threads get far more registered posters comenting on them than all the other straight threads do.
So, so far we established that there are other possible, more plausible reasons for why the said gay threads have "thousands of views"
If you think that it's more plausible that all those views come from guests who just randomly found those threads(thousands of people randomly finding something is pretty statistically unlikely) and not from registered members who already know this website, then you're even stupider than I thought - and I never had a high opinion about your intelligence.
(the only thread in the million territory is a HETEROSEXUAL thread, and demolished any other thread on getbig period)
This does nothing to change the fact that any random thread on the sex board with gay content gets far more views and replies than any random straight thread. Do the math.
So if these gay threads have more replies despite the fact that they are viewed less, that can only mean that the same people more or less are posting on the thread (I never mentioned anything about gimmicks, I'm talking about a group of people, not the same person when I say "the same people". that should plenty clear already..).
What the hell are you talking about? Bay's threads are viewed more. There is only one case of a straight thred getting more views than the multiple gay threads. One thread. They also get more replies. Also, I am talking about interest here, and interest is measured by views and not by posts. There is a much greater interest in Bay's threads evident by the much greater number of views.
The bottom line is this: you started this thread trying to poke fun at getbiggers and didnd't think there would be sufficient backlash for you to have to back up your claims, i.e. there wasn't enough of a 'group think' factor goin for ya. Now you are coming up with all sorts of absurd arguments trying to justify the claim when it actually holds no water.
You are a Paki retard with arguments that are convoluted and downright stupid. Your postulations are extremely unlikely and a classic example of picking at straws in an argument. Saying that all the views that Bay's threads get are from guests who just randomly came here to read his threads is far less likely than assuming that the people viewing those threads are already aware of this board. Saying that Bay's threads are less popular than straight threads because there are far more views than replies, which according to you means that the same small number of people are viewing them is a self-defeating argument, because Bay's threads also get far more replies than any of the straight threads. What does this indicate? That people are far more likely to open threads and view them than to actually post on them and this is valid for any thread on any subject, you dumby.
So naturally, if both straight threads and gay thread get far more views than replies, then obviously it means that your argument of more views than replies cut both ways, and thus views are a much better indicator of interest than replies. Fucking owned, kid.
No hard feelings, it is ok.. we can all be wrong some times.
It is only your retarded envy of me and desire to pay me back for all the times I've owned you in the past that makes you think that you are right. In reality, I have just added another ownage to the list of many times I've owned you.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
