I didn't read any of that you prick. You keep looking at absolute number of views when in actuality they don't mean shit. For some one dumber than I you might be able to argue that, but as is typical with megalomaniac such as yourself you think people would let a dumbass argument like that pass.
Lets see how your so-called intelligence holds up here:
THE ONLY WAY TO COMPARE INTEREST IN THREADS IS BY RATE OF THREAD VIEWING, NOT ABSOLUTE VIEWS YOU FUCKING IDIOT! (we are comparing number of views here, not replies)
THE NUMBER OF REPLIES HAS NO BEARING ON INTEREST, AS THE POSTS CAN BE MADE BY THE SAME PERSON UNLESS PROVEN OTHERWISE YOU DIMWIT (this can be proven, just check the thread you queer eyed asswipe)
You can NOT get beyond these facts. Occams razor can only be used once you have understood the situation, which seems to be beyond your grasp, genius.
Another thing to add: Most views on threads are by guests, because as was pointed out before the ratio of guests to members is very high, in the range of 7-10. So the number of views on a thread don't tell us aanything about the trends of getbig member viewrship, NONE.
Take these arguments and shove them up your ass you fucking ####. I'm done wasting my time on you.
Meltdown.
Prove to me that all the views in the straight threads are not from the same small number of straight posters or from guests, and that all the views on the Bay threads are each from a different member of this board. You can't, dumbass. Fucking
owned like the bitch you are.
See why your argument is idiotic? Because it can go either way, and no one can prove one way or another. Now stfu and withdraw from my thread in shame.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
