Author Topic: ZACK KHAN JUST WON!! HELL YES!! (Read 31239 times)

spinnis · « **Reply #100 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:20:57 AM »

say what parker

Quote from: Parker on October 19, 2009, 03:06:16 AM

How much better can it be? No amount of lighting can make a person ripped. Look at his tri in that tricep shot. Smooth as hell, no seperation, whatsoever.

after he brings up his legs .....LIGHTS OUT

spinnis · « **Reply #101 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:27:07 AM »

I can see a few cuts Parker, can you?

looking forward to the comparisions, because these photos doesn't do his size justice hehe.

Pecs · « **Reply #102 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:28:42 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on October 19, 2009, 03:20:57 AM

say what parker

after he brings up his legs .....LIGHTS OUT

looks good... but his colour seems uneven

Parker · « **Reply #103 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:29:09 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on October 19, 2009, 03:20:57 AM

say what parker

after he brings up his legs .....LIGHTS OUT

he is still smooth, he lacks good back seperation (density), lower and well, his whole back, arms is soft. Glutes shredded, and hams, are as well. But his back isn't, that is odd as hell. look at the blurriness of his tris and delts, no seperation or striations. Zero. This what Flex back looked like in 1993, and his arms...Look at the seperation, detail, and striations...That is conditioning. The front still lacks seperation and conditioning. Piss Poor.

spinnis · « **Reply #104 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:30:24 AM »

you were wrong, I was right, Move along son

Parker · « **Reply #105 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:35:13 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on October 19, 2009, 03:30:24 AM

you were wrong, I was right, Move along son

Doubt it, look at his back it LACKS CONDITIONING, HIS lower back is PISS Poor. He lacks depht of detail for such a big dude His Arms lack definition andt Striations, as a mtter of fact his triceps are blurry. I posted a pic of what detail is suppose to look like...

Face it... in life its good for you to not just acknowledge defeat...but that you don't know what you are talking about...I like you though, the way you try to beat people with the the half truth, is amusing....

spinnis · « **Reply #106 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:36:10 AM »

Quote from: Parker on October 19, 2009, 03:35:13 AM

Doubt it, look at his back it LACKS CONDITIONING, HIS lower back is PISS Poor. He lacks depht of detail for such a big dude His Arms lack definition andt Striations, as a mtter of fact his triceps are blurry. I posted a pic of what detail is suppose to look like...

Face it... in life its good for you to not just acknowledge defeat...but that you don't know what you are talking about...I like you though, the way you try to beat people with the the half truth, is amusing....

you posted a sharpened photo of flex in amazing lightning, WAY TO GO lol

Boost · « **Reply #107 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:36:30 AM »

rocket · « **Reply #108 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:36:51 AM »

A nice physique to start being a pro with. Shame that he'll probably wreck it, trying to get to the next level. Strange physique, though, delts look fine from back, slightly small from front.

spinnis · « **Reply #109 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:37:08 AM »

Quote from: Boost on October 19, 2009, 03:36:30 AM

keep in mind zack DWARFS phil on stage also

Boost · « **Reply #110 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:37:42 AM »

Quote from: Parker on October 19, 2009, 03:35:13 AM

Doubt it, look at his back it LACKS CONDITIONING, HIS lower back is PISS Poor.

His lower back is much better than Jay's in the pics I posted.......do you agree?

kiwiol · « **Reply #111 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:38:37 AM »

Quote from: Parker on October 19, 2009, 03:35:13 AM

Doubt it, look at his back it LACKS CONDITIONING, HIS lower back is PISS Poor. He lacks depht of detail for such a big dude His Arms lack definition andt Striations, as a mtter of fact his triceps are blurry. I posted a pic of what detail is suppose to look like...

Face it... in life its good for you to not just acknowledge defeat...but that you don't know what you are talking about...I like you though, the way you try to beat people with the the half truth, is amusing....

The guy looks like Paul Dillett with a great back. Conditioning is no big deal - he'll pick up a few things once he competes in the pro ranks a few times. The thing about the guy is his size and shape at his age and height.

spinnis · « **Reply #112 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:38:46 AM »

Quote from: Boost on October 19, 2009, 03:37:42 AM

His lower back is much better than Jay's in the pics I posted.......do you agree?

and arms and delts and overall back looks better,

only need to bring up dem legs

spinnis · « **Reply #113 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:39:35 AM »

Quote from: kiwiol on October 19, 2009, 03:38:37 AM

The guy looks like Paul Dillett with a great back. Conditioning is no big deal - he'll pick up a few things once he competes in the pro ranks a few times. The thing about the guy is his size and shape at his age and height.

Just wait until you see him standing next to some ifbbs hehe

he will looks like a MONSTER with a tiny fucking waist and amazing structure

Boost · « **Reply #114 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:41:18 AM »

Zack will be appearing on Palumbo's radio show available tonight!!!!

It was recorded last night only 2 hours after he stepped off stage!!!

kiwiol · « **Reply #115 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:43:06 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on October 19, 2009, 03:39:35 AM

Just wait until you see him standing next to some ifbbs hehe

he will looks like a MONSTER with a tiny fucking waist and amazing structure

I think he can go all the way in 2 - 3 years if he keeps improving steadily. Would be cool to see him step onstage at 300 - 310 lb ripped. He's got the frame for it.

Boost · « **Reply #116 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:43:53 AM »

Damn looking at the fbd and bdb He really has a tiny waist for such a huge dude!

He's got the calves too!!!

spinnis · « **Reply #117 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:44:15 AM »

Quote from: kiwiol on October 19, 2009, 03:43:06 AM

I think he can go all the way in 2 - 3 years if he keeps improving steadily. Would be cool to see him step onstage at 300 - 310 lb ripped. He's got the frame for it.

I think he was around 260 in stage, so another 15-20 pounds mostly in his legs and hes good to go. WHILE keeping the small waist.

Parker · « **Reply #118 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:49:51 AM »

Quote from: Boost on October 19, 2009, 03:37:42 AM

His lower back is much better than Jay's in the pics I posted.......do you agree?

hell yeah, I've always said Jay's lower back was poor. And how he won his Arnold Classics with a shitty overall back is astounding. I Believe Jay's nickname should be called "The Gift", because he has gotten soo many of them. Int fact, I think Zach looks better than Jay has ever looked, bar this past Mr. O.

Quote from: kiwiol on October 19, 2009, 03:38:37 AM

The guy looks like Paul Dillett with a great back. Conditioning is no big deal - he'll pick up a few things once he competes in the pro ranks a few times. The thing about the guy is his size and shape at his age and height.

Do You how many times this has been said...Too fucking many times. Again, Fux,Harrison, Dillett, Flex (in term of winning the O), Federov, Jones. We cannot go by "if's" or what will happen. Hell, Flex was suppose to be Mr. O by 1998, but his ass didn't come in shape. And Paul, looked better from the front. Zach looks better from the back.

And conditioning IS a big deal...look at what happen to Wolf, and what happen to Jay. A conditioned big man will win the show.

What I see is people who are hungry for a something new, but it always fades, and then the next big dude, the he fades. Face it, the ones who win get the shit down pat-size, shape, conditioning-Haney, Dorian (lacked shape), Ronnie, Dex, Cutler (lacked shape-but had the size, and this the conditioning). And some help with the Judges. This is the key to winning.

spinnis · « **Reply #119 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:51:34 AM »

Parker · « **Reply #120 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:54:06 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on October 19, 2009, 03:36:10 AM

you posted a sharpened photo of flex in amazing lightning, WAY TO GO lol

No, sorry, that the same pic from 1993...it has been in mags since 1993. Way to not notice that.

spinnis · « **Reply #121 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:57:49 AM »

Quote from: Parker on October 19, 2009, 03:54:06 AM

No, sorry, that the same pic from 1993...it has been in mags since 1993. Way to not notice that.

yes the cameras back then did it automatically.. Same with the back lat photos of flex and shawn for example..

thats why guys these days looks softer even though they are harder due to the cameras.

Boost · « **Reply #122 on:** October 19, 2009, 03:59:24 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on October 19, 2009, 03:51:34 AM

Awesome pic!

kiwiol · « **Reply #123 on:** October 19, 2009, 04:00:31 AM »

Quote from: Parker on October 19, 2009, 03:49:51 AM

Do You how many times this has been said...Too fucking many times. Again, Fux,Harrison, Dillett, Flex (in term of winning the O), Federov, Jones. We cannot go by "if's" or what will happen. Hell, Flex was suppose to be Mr. O by 1998, but his ass didn't come in shape. And Paul, looked better from the front. Zach looks better from the back.

And conditioning IS a big deal...look at what happen to Wolf, and what happen to Jay. A conditioned big man will win the show.

What I see is people who are hungry for a something new, but it always fades, and then the next big dude, the he fades. Face it, the ones who win get the shit down pat-size, shape, conditioning-Haney, Dorian (lacked shape), Ronnie, Dex, Cutler (lacked shape-but had the size, and this the conditioning). And some help with the Judges. This is the key to winning.

You're not looking at the big picture. Those guys did get hype as did guys like Kevin, Shawn, Dorian, Flex and others. Some of them lived up to it, most didn't (at least, consistently). Zac isn't on the same league as guys like Peter Putnam or Ken Jones, which is why the fuss.

As far as conditioning is concerned, of course it's a big deal, but it's the one thing that changes from contest to contest. A guy who didn't peak for one show can win the next show simply because he dialed in properly this time. Once he does a few pro shows, he'll get better at it.

rocket · « **Reply #124 on:** October 19, 2009, 04:02:10 AM »

Hope he doesn't wreck that physique. Plenty of them have.

He should sign with teh Chad

Author Topic: ZACK KHAN JUST WON!! HELL YES!! (Read 31239 times)

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis