Author Topic: In 8 Years How Many DEATHS Did George W. Bush Amass? (Read 3253 times)

Mons Venus · « **on:** October 24, 2009, 06:53:10 AM »

Between US Soliders, innocent Iraqi's and "living" Stem Cells thrown away in garbage cans, how many DEATHS did George "The Grim Reaper" Bush amass?

1.5-2.0 MILLION seems like a reasonable estimate.

Discuss.......

Mons Venus · « **Reply #1 on:** October 24, 2009, 07:15:45 AM »

Keep in mind your estimate should not include the MAIMED.......only the DEAD.

dario73 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 24, 2009, 10:06:40 AM »

Exactly none. Yup, none. That is the correct amount when war is brought to your shores.

Now, I supect you are an idiot. Therefore, I hope you apply your misguided and misinformed point of view to Obama. Start counting!!!

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #3 on:** October 24, 2009, 10:17:19 AM »

Quote from: Mons Venus on October 24, 2009, 07:15:45 AM

Keep in mind your estimate should not include the MAIMED.......only the DEAD.

How many were the fault of LBJ?
Clinton?
FDR?
Truman?

mons - GGFFYY!!

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #4 on:** October 24, 2009, 10:18:33 AM »

Mons your really out there bro.

I totally disagreed with the war in Iraq too but those people were killing each other way before we got there and terrorists in the region kill constantly. People (especially women) are truely oppressed there.

Sadam's regime was brutal. Bush and congress are responsible for the Americans that lost their lives there, I agree. At least Iraq is better off now than before the war. I actually talked to quite a few soldiers and engineers who were over there. They said the place was totally backward when the troops first arrived. The leading families had everything and 95% of the people had nothing. Many areas did not have electricity. Thats the truth. They made great strides (unfortunately with our tax dollars and corporate contracts) in infrastructure and basic living needs for the Iraqi people. The middle east is really different than here or Europe, very backward for the most part. Dude, you have to go there or talk to people who have been there rather than criticizing behind your keyboard.

Mons Venus · « **Reply #5 on:** October 24, 2009, 03:38:56 PM »

Quote from: dario73 on October 24, 2009, 10:06:40 AM

Exactly none. Yup, none. That is the correct amount when war is brought to your shores.

Now, I supect you are an idiot. Therefore, I hope you apply your misguided and misinformed point of view to Obama. Start counting!!!

Still buying the Saddam = 911 story ?

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #6 on:** October 24, 2009, 03:41:57 PM »

Mons Venus · « **Reply #7 on:** October 25, 2009, 06:20:21 AM »

^^^^^^

Mons Venus · « **Reply #8 on:** October 25, 2009, 06:24:13 AM »

Quote from: Mons Venus on October 24, 2009, 06:53:10 AM

Between US Soliders, innocent Iraqi's and "living" Stem Cells thrown away in garbage cans, how many DEATHS did George "The Grim Reaper" Bush amass?

1.5-2.0 MILLION seems like a reasonable estimate.

Discuss.......

Just wondering why our resident scuumbag NeoCons refuse to chime in?

As usual 3333's chimes in with another topic DIVERSION/SPIN.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #9 on:** October 25, 2009, 11:51:14 AM »

Quote from: Mons Venus on October 25, 2009, 06:24:13 AM

Just wondering why our resident scuumbag NeoCons refuse to chime in?

As usual 3333's chimes in with another topic DIVERSION/SPIN.

Thats funny coming from a disgusting POS like yourself who I will beat the fuck out of if I ever meet you since you said you want 50,000 us soldiers to die in IED attacks. Not to mention your fake war record and failure to post your business info.

Mons, without a doubt, you are probably the single dumbest person I have ever encountered.

MM2K · « **Reply #10 on:** October 25, 2009, 08:50:03 PM »

Quote

Still buying the Saddam = 911 story ?

There IS NO Saddam=911 story. That's a retarded strawman that sewer libs like you created. If you are confident of your views, then stop creating stupid false arguments and then atributing them to your opponent. Your hero Barack Nixon Carter likes this tactic a lot, but I think it is starting to wear thin on him.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #11 on:** October 25, 2009, 09:00:14 PM »

Quote from: MM2K on October 25, 2009, 08:50:03 PM

There IS NO Saddam=911 story. That's a retarded strawman that sewer libs like you created. If you are confident of your views, then stop creating stupid false arguments and then atributing them to your opponent. Your hero Barack Nixon Carter likes this tactic a lot, but I think it is starting to wear thin on him.

wow... really... something libs made up huh

Ok, how old are you? I'm guessing you were celebrating your 13th birthday in 2001, max.... You really going to sit here and say that there was no attempt to connect Saddam and Al-Qaeda? BWHAHAHahahahahahaha

240 is Back · « **Reply #12 on:** October 25, 2009, 09:01:51 PM »

Quote from: MM2K on October 25, 2009, 08:50:03 PM

There IS NO Saddam=911 story. That's a retarded strawman that sewer libs like you created.

Correct. Here you will see Dick Cheney describing this connection as well.

Incredible the sewer libs were able to trick cheney into saying this.

Kazan · « **Reply #13 on:** October 26, 2009, 07:49:37 AM »

Well if you think Sadam wasn't at the very least funding terrorist organizations you are delusional, then there was the group of choir boys called Ansar El Islam that had a base in Iraq, but none of that matters right? Iraq had all the ingredients to make WMD just not a delivery system ( So that makes it not a WMD for some reason).As far as the stuff that was already a WMD that UN supposedly was monitoring was in delapidated bunkers that was not being guarded or monitored.

When it comes right down to it there was more than enough reason to invade Iraq, them breaking the cease fire before the ink was dry in 91 is first on the list. So the war is "legal", as ill advised as it may have been.

BM OUT · « **Reply #14 on:** October 26, 2009, 07:52:57 AM »

We are at war.Its a shame the number wasnt like 8 million.I wonder how many lives have been lost due to democratic policies in the inner cities of our coountry,ALL of which Obama supports.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #15 on:** October 26, 2009, 08:02:10 AM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on October 26, 2009, 07:52:57 AM

We are at war.

Is that so? With who? Certainly not Iraq as that has never been the case from Day 1.

Kazan · « **Reply #16 on:** October 26, 2009, 08:04:55 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on October 26, 2009, 08:02:10 AM

Is that so? With who? Certainly not Iraq as that has never been the case from Day 1.

What the hell are you talking about, the gulf war was suspended with a cease fire not a surrender, so the war never actually ended in 91, we just stopped shooting at them

Hedgehog · « **Reply #17 on:** October 26, 2009, 08:06:17 AM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on October 26, 2009, 07:52:57 AM

We are at war.Its a shame the number wasnt like 8 million.I wonder how many lives have been lost due to democratic policies in the inner cities of our coountry,ALL of which Obama supports.

The homicide rate nearly doubled from the mid 1960's to the late 1970's.

In 1980, it peaked at 10.2 per 100,000 population and subsequently fell off to 7.9 per 100,000 in 1984.

It rose again in the late 1980's and early 1990's to another peak in 1991 of 9.8 per 100,000.

From 1992 to 2000, the rate declined sharply. Since then, the rate has been stable.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #18 on:** October 26, 2009, 08:07:36 AM »

Quote from: Hedgehog on October 26, 2009, 08:06:17 AM

The homicide rate nearly doubled from the mid 1960's to the late 1970's.

In 1980, it peaked at 10.2 per 100,000 population and subsequently fell off to 7.9 per 100,000 in 1984.

It rose again in the late 1980's and early 1990's to another peak in 1991 of 9.8 per 100,000.

From 1992 to 2000, the rate declined sharply. Since then, the rate has been stable.

I remember when the crack epidemic hit NYC in the early 90's. It was CRAZY. 2200 murders.

Kazan · « **Reply #19 on:** October 26, 2009, 08:09:53 AM »

Quote from: Mons Venus on October 25, 2009, 06:24:13 AM

Just wondering why our resident scuumbag NeoCons refuse to chime in?

As usual 3333's chimes in with another topic DIVERSION/SPIN.

BM OUT · « **Reply #20 on:** October 26, 2009, 08:26:04 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on October 26, 2009, 08:02:10 AM

Is that so? With who? Certainly not Iraq as that has never been the case from Day 1.

Thats the point.We send troops over there,bomb them,then rebuild the country and try to send democracy there.We should have bombed until no one was left.Now we have people crying over deaths?I wonder how many English people cried when they bombed Berlin?

OzmO · « **Reply #21 on:** October 26, 2009, 09:36:01 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 25, 2009, 09:01:51 PM

Correct. Here you will see Dick Cheney describing this connection as well.

Incredible the sewer libs were able to trick cheney into saying this.

Cheney is a lib pawn?

bears · « **Reply #22 on:** October 26, 2009, 03:17:59 PM »

Quote from: Mons Venus on October 24, 2009, 06:53:10 AM

Between US Soliders, innocent Iraqi's and "living" Stem Cells thrown away in garbage cans, how many DEATHS did George "The Grim Reaper" Bush amass?

1.5-2.0 MILLION seems like a reasonable estimate.

Discuss.......

talk about a guy romanticizing politics. im guessing you watch a whole lot of movies.

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #23 on:** October 26, 2009, 04:36:57 PM »

Cheney may have been smart with a lot of experience but he was not straight with the American people and believed he should make decisions in our best interest without communication and honesty. That's what I didn't like about him and that's what I don't like about some of the elitist liberals surrounding Obama. They think they know what's best for us, as we are too dumb to help ourselves. These people aren't withholding information so much as they are controlling and manipulating it to serve their agenda. Educated people need limited government, not more government.

240 is Back · « **Reply #24 on:** October 26, 2009, 04:55:44 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on October 26, 2009, 09:36:01 AM

Cheney is a lib pawn?

It makes sense, doesnt it?