Rush and 3333 got punk'd

[LurkerNoMore]

Ok.  This story was wrong. 

This is where your response should have stopped.  Instead you blather on and do nothing show how feverishly you need to "explain" why you were wrong so that it "will be" right.

[BM OUT]

So.... it's okay to post complete lies - then just call it "SATIRE"


Later in the program, Limbaugh learned the report was a fake and alerted his listeners. But he insisted the fabricated thesis was still in line with what the president thinks, the New York Daily news reported.

"So I shout from the mountaintops: 'It was satire!'" Limbaugh said on the program. "But we know he (Obama) thinks it.

So its ok to claim Palin plagerised a speech ,then,when it PROVEN to be a lie you say NOTHING.Funny,never saw you upset over Olbermann doing that.

[Soul Crusher]

So its ok to claim Palin plagerised a speech ,then,when it PROVEN to be a lie you say NOTHING.Funny,never saw you upset over Olbermann doing that.

How quick we forget the double standard. 

[Grape Ape]

This is where your response should have stopped.  Instead you blather on and do nothing show how feverishly you need to "explain" why you were wrong so that it "will be" right.

Take his advice 333 - he's an expert on this subject.

[Soul Crusher]

Take his advice 333 - he's an expert on this subject.

Look, it was a screw up.  Whatever.  The youtube clips I posted are still extremely disturbing. 

Not one of these posters has ever tried to explain those. 

[LurkerNoMore]

Take his advice 333 - he's an expert on this subject.

I learned from watching conservatives.

[LurkerNoMore]

Look, it was a screw up.  Whatever.  The youtube clips I posted are still extremely disturbing. 

Not one of these posters has ever tried to explain those. 

LOL!!!!  Still doing it.

[Soul Crusher]

LOL!!!!  Still doing it.

Do you agree with obama that our nation is fatally flawed because the constitution did not include re-distribution of wealth?  YES or NO?

[BM OUT]

Its funny,the very people getting all over Rush for reporting this,are the same ones who STILL think Dan Rathers report was legit.They still claim using fake ducuments is ok because its the bigger picture that counts.

[Grape Ape]

Look, it was a screw up.  Whatever.  The youtube clips I posted are still extremely disturbing. 

Not one of these posters has ever tried to explain those. 

They can't.  Lurker and his types guys don't explain anything.  All they look for is the next "gotcha" moment.  They're too excited about the story turning out to be fake to engage in anything of substance.  It's why George Bush threads still pop up here all the time.

[Soul Crusher]

They can't.  Lurker and his types guys don't explain anything.  All they look for is the next "gotcha" moment.  They're too excited about the story turning out to be fake to engage in anything of substance.  It's why George Bush threads still pop up here all the time.

I have been trying to have a discussion on the clips I posted for months. 

[Straw Man]

Look, it was a screw up.  Whatever.  The youtube clips I posted are still extremely disturbing. 

Not one of these posters has ever tried to explain those. 

Hugo posted a transcript of the source of your 10 second clip and in context it's not disturbing at all

At some point you're going to have to face that fact the you're the one that's "disturbed" and you might want to consider seeking some medical help

[Soul Crusher]

Hugo posted a transcript of the source of your 10 second clip and in context it's not disturbing at all

At some point you're going to have to face that fact the you're the one that's "disturbed" and you might want to consider seeking some medical help

Its not disturbing to someone like yourself who believes all this garbage, but to most people it most likely is.   

[Straw Man]

Do you agree with obama that our nation is fatally flawed because the constitution did not include re-distribution of wealth?  YES or NO?

when did Obama say that??

[Straw Man]

Its not disturbing to someone like yourself who believes all this garbage, but to most people it most likely is.   

Here's the transcript of the quote that Hugo posted.  What part do you find disturbing?

EOB: I’m wondering if the ethnically-mixed couple of today, if when their child is thirty-four years old, if they’ll fnd it any easier to deal with these issues than you have found it?

Obama: That’s an interesting question. I’m not sure. I think in some ways there’s less novelty to the idea of mixed couples. They’re not seen as lurid or perverse in ways that I think they were thirty years ago. I think that this country is inevitably going to be undergoing changes simply due to demographics. There’s been a lot of talk about the “browning of America” ..

EOB: I was just going to use that same phrase ...

Obama: ... and I think that is going to be happening. We can’t ignore it. I think whether or not my children or your children will have to struggle with these same issues depends on what we do, and whether we take some mutual responsibility for bridging the divisions that exist right now. And I really want to emphasize the word “responsibility.”  I think that whether you are a white executive living out in the suburbs, who doesn’t want to pay taxes to inner-city children for them to go to school, or you’re an inner-city child who doesn’t want to take responsibility for keeping your street safe and clean, both of those groups have to take some responsibility if we’re going to get beyond the kinds of divisions that we face right now

HA!!!!  So the context is important, what do you know there 3333

He was asked a question dealing with racial issues.  Of fucking course he's going to be addressing individuals that need to work together.  It's not just any white exec 3333, he's specifically talking to a certain group of those.  He's saying in this that both sides have a responsibility to bridge divisions.  Yet the quote you posted leaves out the part that allows this context to be understood.  Now who was spinning 333?  I'm happy to admit and would have admitted here if I were wrong.  I was not, will you do the same?

[Soul Crusher]

when did Obama say that??

[shootfighter1]

33386 can probably find the link but I have heard similar sound clips.
I know he said the civil rights movement did not go far enough because it didn't address redistribution enough.  I see the argument in favor of it (and in the 60s I probably would have been a civil rights supporter too) but do not agree in taking from one group and giving to another.

Rush got it wrong on that one.  But when you look at everything as a whole, you can't separate Obama from where he came from and the liberal extremists and hardball Chicago groups that helped his ascent to power.  We can argue about 1 detail or another, but you look at everything together...like having a study with a couple people vs a study with hundreds or thousands.  There's more power and predictability when you look at his quotes, votes, chosen associates, etc together.  The campaign did a great job in portraying Obama in a way that is different than you'd believe based on his past and his rise to political power.  It's clear he is a progressive liberal who champions the poor and the minorities disproportionally, I don't care what they tried to make us believe in the election...this is his general philosophy as defined by his actions and his history.  It's not a bad thing...but it shouldn't be disguised either.

[LurkerNoMore]

They can't.  Lurker and his types guys don't explain anything.  All they look for is the next "gotcha" moment.  They're too excited about the story turning out to be fake to engage in anything of substance.  It's why George Bush threads still pop up here all the time.

 

Try again when you have something of more substance.

[Grape Ape]

 

Try again when you have something of more substance.

I tried, but I read all your posts and couldn't find any.

[Straw Man]

Do you agree with obama that our nation is fatally flawed because the constitution did not include re-distribution of wealth?  YES or NO?

show me the full quote in context

thanks

[Soul Crusher]

show me the full quote in context

thanks

Did you listen to the two clips? 

[Straw Man]

Did you listen to the two clips? 

no - I'll listen to them later

show me the full quote where Obama says "our nation is fatally flawed because the constitution did not include re-distribution of wealth?"

[Soul Crusher]

no - I'll listen to them later

show me the full quote where Obama says "our nation is fatally flawed because the constitution did not include re-distribution of wealth?"

The first clip says the the constituion is political document that "represents the fatal flaws of this nation that we carry to this day".

The second one is longer and says that the Warren Court was not radical enough because it did not address "redistributive justice" in terms of intepretation of the constitution.   

[Straw Man]

The first clip says the the constituion is political document that "represents the fatal flaws of this nation that we carry to this day".

The second one is longer and says that the Warren Court was not radical enough because it did not address "redistributive justice" in terms of intepretation of the constitution.   

great

find me the full text of the quote where Obama says "our nation is fatally flawed because the constitution did not include re-distribution of wealth?"

find me the text of either of the quotes that are in your clips.

the last quote that got you so disturbed was perfectly fine when seen in it's larger context (such as the sentence before and after the friggin quote -not to mention the other dialogue)

[Soul Crusher]

great

find me the full text of the quote where Obama says "our nation is fatally flawed because the constitution did not include re-distribution of wealth?"

find me the text of either of the quotes that are in your clips.

the last quote that got you so disturbed was perfectly fine when seen in it's larger context (such as the sentence before and after the friggin quote -not to mention the other dialogue)

It is disturbing in any context IMHO.  He makes assumptions about people that he really is in no position to make.  just like the Gates affair, just like the doctors lopping ofr feet for money, just liekt he doctors stealing tonsils, etc.