Author Topic: VINCE TAYLOR VS. CHRIS CORMIER (Read 30386 times)

Danimal77 · « **on:** November 01, 2009, 04:33:35 PM »

Who was the better of two?

Discuss.....

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #1 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:02:06 PM »

Quote from: Danimal77 on November 01, 2009, 04:33:35 PM

Who was the better of two?

Discuss.....

Vince did much better as a pro

vitamin J · « **Reply #2 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:08:17 PM »

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #3 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:08:58 PM »

taylor

JaggyShortBuff · « **Reply #4 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:12:47 PM »

Cormier was proof of what a lazy n***** gets when he has all the potential, but no real work ethic....

bodybuilder1234 · « **Reply #5 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:18:46 PM »

Chris Cormier had a better physique imo

6 time asc runner up, shud of won it in 04

tbombz · « **Reply #6 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:20:51 PM »

arnold classic 1994

first out vince taylor
second out aaron baker
third out chris cormier

Danimal77 · « **Reply #7 on:** November 01, 2009, 06:31:13 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 01, 2009, 05:02:06 PM

Vince did much better as a pro

And was at least a dozen years older than Chris.

uberman09 · « **Reply #8 on:** November 01, 2009, 06:32:30 PM »

who the fuck start threads like this seriously..

Danimal77 · « **Reply #9 on:** November 01, 2009, 06:43:25 PM »

Quote from: uberman09 on November 01, 2009, 06:32:30 PM

who the fuck start threads like this seriously..

Insane eh? Wanting to get a discussion on a comparison between TWO PRO bodyuilders, on a bodybuilding forum. Who would have thought?

Royalty · « **Reply #10 on:** November 01, 2009, 07:13:03 PM »

Vince Taylor

gcb · « **Reply #11 on:** November 01, 2009, 07:18:52 PM »

theoretically CC had better structure, so for me CC - but perhaps their contest records say otherwise

Hulkster · « **Reply #12 on:** November 01, 2009, 07:34:04 PM »

as good as chris was at the 99 O, (probably his career best shape) Taylor was better.

better everything really. better calves, legs, way better arms, better abs, better back you name it.

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #13 on:** November 01, 2009, 07:34:53 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 01, 2009, 07:34:04 PM

as good as chris was at the 99 O, (probably his career best shape) Taylor was better.

better everything really. better calves, legs, way better arms, better abs, better back you name it.

X2 I can agree this time

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #14 on:** November 01, 2009, 07:35:39 PM »

Quote from: gcb on November 01, 2009, 07:18:52 PM

theoretically CC had better structure, so for me CC - but perhaps their contest records say otherwise

how does he have a better structure thanvince taylor....

??
taylor by a country mile..
cormier is overated

Danimal77 · « **Reply #15 on:** November 01, 2009, 09:00:46 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 01, 2009, 07:34:04 PM

as good as chris was at the 99 O, (probably his career best shape) Taylor was better.

better everything really. better calves, legs, way better arms, better abs, better back you name it.

Vince always reminded me of a bulked up version of Robby Robinson.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #16 on:** November 01, 2009, 09:07:28 PM »

Quote from: uberman09 on November 01, 2009, 06:32:30 PM

who the fuck start threads like this seriously..

who gets rid of their tv so they can post all day on a "gay" bodybuilding forum seriously...

maybe some psychology books will help you figure that out, right?

E

Earl1972 · « **Reply #17 on:** November 01, 2009, 09:08:33 PM »

oh cormier is better

E

gcb · « **Reply #18 on:** November 01, 2009, 09:21:09 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on November 01, 2009, 07:35:39 PM

how does he have a better structure thanvince taylor....??
taylor by a country mile..
cormier is overated

Taylors legs were undersized and I don't think he ever held as much beef as CC. No CC has much better legs.

nukkaready · « **Reply #19 on:** November 02, 2009, 03:18:27 AM »

the 99' Mr. O version of CC would have beaten anything that Taylor ever brought to the stage. still... both were lazy dudes.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #20 on:** November 02, 2009, 03:27:34 AM »

Quote from: gcb on November 01, 2009, 09:21:09 PM

Taylors legs were undersized and I don't think he ever held as much beef as CC. No CC has much better legs.

and cormier arms are undersized
arms are the show pieceof bbing
cormiers didn't pop no roundness
I think chriss is very overated

dr.chimps · « **Reply #21 on:** November 02, 2009, 03:30:47 AM »

Vince. Especially with the pirate eye patch.

gcb · « **Reply #22 on:** November 02, 2009, 03:56:08 AM »

his arms look fine here

kiwiol · « **Reply #23 on:** November 02, 2009, 03:57:36 AM »

If they competed against each other at their best shapes, Chris would win it hands down. But he was never consistent unlike Vince who was.

Pecs · « **Reply #24 on:** November 02, 2009, 03:58:15 AM »

chris doesn't have the WOW factor. (great body nonetheless)

Vince got those great arms.