Author Topic: VINCE TAYLOR VS. CHRIS CORMIER (Read 30337 times)

I was just clarifying your question addressed to ND, as to what he meant by saying Vince did better as a pro.

Peak Cormier would have too much size for Vince Taylor to handle and would beat him. Vince's quads and back were nothing special, while both were strong points for Cormier.

Parker · « **Reply #31 on:** November 02, 2009, 05:06:03 AM »

CC had the type of physique that one could keep adding muscle to, he had the potential to be another Ronnie, but I think the 6 ASC 2nd place finishes really fucked up his head, because 2 of those (against Cutler, he outright won them), seriously he beat Cutler from the front and when they turned around, Cutler's severe lack of back detail was very noticable.
Cormier had a better structure, and he was still growing, he could have been 275 and looked great, he had Better abs than Taylor, better back, better legs (thigh rods were insane) arms were a draw, chest as well, they both had great calves.

Boost · « **Reply #32 on:** November 02, 2009, 05:10:57 AM »

Chris never came in dry and shredded to the bone.

Venice Beach in the 90's killed a lot of bodybuilders chance of greatness.

Too much distraction

Dillet, Flex, Cormier......

lax · « **Reply #33 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:14:16 AM »

its a tie
since both are broke

Parker · « **Reply #34 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:16:53 AM »

Quote from: lax on November 02, 2009, 06:14:16 AM

its a tie
since both are broke

I don't think Vince is broke, do you have any proof that he is.

littleguns · « **Reply #35 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:20:12 AM »

Aaron Baker was better than them both. One of the most underrated BB'er there ever was.......WBF screwed up any and all chances....

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #36 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:36:46 AM »

Quote from: kiwiol on November 02, 2009, 04:50:11 AM

I was just clarifying your question addressed to ND, as to what he meant by saying Vince did better as a pro.

Peak Cormier would have too much size for Vince Taylor to handle and would beat him. Vince's quads and back were nothing special, while both were strong points for Cormier.

vinice had very good quads but cormier's were better.. cormier had good calves for a black man but vinice had great calves for a black or a white man!!.. he had the best black calves i have ever seen after paul dillett's!!.. vinice had better biceps, triceps, and, shoulders and overall i prefer his physique but yes cormier at his best deserved to beat him because of his size and much better back..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #37 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:37:53 AM »

MCWAY · « **Reply #38 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:43:54 AM »

Quote from: JaggyShortBuff on November 01, 2009, 05:12:47 PM

Cormier was proof of what a lazy n***** gets when he has all the potential, but no real work ethic....

Excuse me!! How exactly do you win 5 IronMan titles, 1 NOC, place 3rd at the O, twice, and place 2nd at the Arnold six times (and in the eyes of some, have a victory taken from you in 2004) by being lazy?

That doesn't even count the other IFBB shows he's won.

Check the poundages he used in his training (which would cripple the average IFBB pro)...That's really "lazy" for you.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #39 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:50:46 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on November 02, 2009, 06:43:54 AM

Excuse me!! How exactly do you win 5 IronMan titles, 1 NOC, place 3rd at the O, twice, and place 2nd at the Arnold six times (and in the eyes of some, have a victory taken from you in 2004) by being lazy?

That doesn't even count the other IFBB shows he's won.

Check the poundages he used in his training (which would cripple the average IFBB pro)...That's really "lazy" for you.

in the 90s chris was known as the strongest among all the pros!!..

jaejonna · « **Reply #40 on:** November 02, 2009, 06:53:05 AM »

Cormier all day ... better shape and flow to physique

lax · « **Reply #41 on:** November 02, 2009, 07:05:21 AM »

Quote from: Parker on November 02, 2009, 06:16:53 AM

I don't think Vince is broke, do you have any proof that he is.

read it here several times
Ida know....

Aaron Singerman · « **Reply #42 on:** November 02, 2009, 07:35:07 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on November 02, 2009, 06:50:46 AM

in the 90s chris was known as the strongest among all the pros!!..

I've seen him incline 455lbs like it was nothing for 8 reps.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #43 on:** November 02, 2009, 07:39:04 AM »

Quote from: Aaron Singerman on November 02, 2009, 07:35:07 AM

I've seen him incline 455lbs like it was nothing for 8 reps.

wow this breaks my record by 2 reps

ChristopherA · « **Reply #44 on:** November 02, 2009, 08:04:05 AM »

Chris owning Nasser in all pics.

Kiddin

kyomu · « **Reply #45 on:** November 02, 2009, 12:50:47 PM »

Cormier except Vince Taylor of 1995

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #46 on:** November 02, 2009, 12:58:28 PM »

Quote from: Pecs on November 02, 2009, 03:58:15 AM

chris doesn't have the WOW factor. (great body nonetheless)

Vince got those great arms.

exactly vince taylor all day
the pics say it all

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #47 on:** November 02, 2009, 01:05:02 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on November 02, 2009, 04:50:11 AM

I was just clarifying your question addressed to ND, as to what he meant by saying Vince did better as a pro.

Peak Cormier would have too much size for Vince Taylor to handle and would beat him. Vince's quads and back were nothing special, while both were strong points for Cormier.

Exactly ! and I think Chris would beat him Taylor competed at about 210 pounds around 5'8" if not less .

Hulkster · « **Reply #48 on:** November 02, 2009, 02:12:12 PM »

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #49 on:** November 02, 2009, 02:58:05 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on November 02, 2009, 03:27:34 AM

and cormier arms are undersized
arms are the show pieceof bbing
cormiers didn't pop no roundness
I think chriss is very overated

If anything Chris is very underrated and I wish my arms were this ' undersized '