"might want to check your reading comprehension "bro". We have travelled to many planets,
Really? Name them, and an unmanned machine doesn't count as "we"
Were (WHERE?) in my statement does it imply i said that we have landed man on the moon?
You said we have "travelled to numerous planets", I simply corrected your statement that was probably made from the part of your brain suffering from liquefactive necrosis, cause you were wrong. sorry. Not trying to be a jerk, just pointing out that you were wrong, calm down.
apoptosis is not necrosis, fail again.
I know the difference, which is why I put "apoptosis" in quotes
I'm more like liquefactive
based on how uptight you are, I'd say you're more like gangrenous, you know, the one in between the toes of diabetic pts "
we as a race have travelled to many planets, why are machines not considered "we", why are you using this defintion, perhaps because it suits your need.I am not wrong, we have travelled to many planets, the op claimed the only place we can visit is the moon, this is false.
you haven't corrected my statment because we have travelled to numerous planets, we have landed on the moon in person and with machine on mars. We have sent many crafts and probes to other planets. Not sure why travelled means land, but thats not what i implied and i'm not sure why landed machinery that can be operated on earth or from craft doesn't count as landing either. Read the opening statment again and tell me what you think he is implying.