Author Topic: Who wrote the bible?  (Read 1331 times)

EL Mariachi

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6019
Who wrote the bible?
« on: November 13, 2009, 03:17:51 PM »
Aliens.

Thats right aliens, christianity is 2009 years old, thats not much, earth has been here for millions of years with life.
Some aliens have been deported here and casted out of their planet. Like in a prison, why do you think the moon is the only planet we can visit from here? beause they made a energetic gate around the moon and earth. That way they make sure the deported ones wont get out, they re trying hard though, thats also the reason the technology is rapid like it is today, the aliens need to make their special space-shuttles and a way to break trough the star gate.
Watch the matrix triology and it will make a little more sence.

And Al fucking Gore needs to spare me his propaganda bullshit about earth warming caused by civilians. Its a total nonsence, the ozonlayer is being damaged by the satalites put by NASA in a way to destroy the energetic field gate. They want to tax the air we breathe by this scam.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Who wrote the bible?
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2009, 06:00:28 PM »
we have visited many planets ::), you mean landed on?

EL Mariachi

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6019
Re: Who wrote the bible?
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2009, 06:57:41 PM »
we have visited many planets ::), you mean landed on?

yes ofcourse landed, thats a visit right

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Who wrote the bible?
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2009, 11:43:14 PM »
yes ofcourse landed, thats a visit right

so landing is the only thing you view as evidence of this boundary? i mean we have travelled to numerous planets, of course we cant land on many because of numerous reasons, we have landed on mars as well with machinery so there goes your theory

Brutal_1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7134
  • Your best is...
Re: Who wrote the bible?
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2009, 06:01:18 PM »
so landing is the only thing you view as evidence of this boundary? i mean we have travelled to numerous planets, of course we cant land on many because of numerous reasons, we have landed on mars as well with machinery so there goes your theory

Might wanna check your sources on that, "apoptosis".

Last I checked, the only other rock man has been on is the Moon.  :-\
just not good enough

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Who wrote the bible?
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2009, 10:12:58 PM »
Might wanna check your sources on that, "apoptosis".

Last I checked, the only other rock man has been on is the Moon.  :-\

might want to check your reading comprehension "bro". We have travelled to many planets, landed man on the moon and landed machines on mars. Were in my statement does it imply i said that we have landed man on the moon?

apoptosis is not necrosis, fail again.

I'm more like liquefactive

Brutal_1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7134
  • Your best is...
Re: Who wrote the bible?
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2009, 09:49:29 AM »
might want to check your reading comprehension "bro". We have travelled to many planets,

Really? Name them, and an unmanned machine doesn't count as "we"  ::)

 Were (WHERE?) in my statement does it imply i said that we have landed man on the moon?

You said we have "travelled to numerous planets", I simply corrected your statement that was probably made from the part of your brain suffering from liquefactive necrosis, cause you were wrong. sorry.  :-\  Not trying to be a jerk, just pointing out that you were wrong, calm down.

apoptosis is not necrosis, fail again.

I know the difference, which is why I put "apoptosis" in quotes   ::)
I'm more like liquefactive

based on how uptight you are, I'd say you're more like gangrenous, you know, the one in between the toes of diabetic pts  :P
just not good enough

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Who wrote the bible?
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2009, 11:42:37 AM »
"might want to check your reading comprehension "bro". We have travelled to many planets,

Really? Name them, and an unmanned machine doesn't count as "we" 

 Were (WHERE?) in my statement does it imply i said that we have landed man on the moon?

You said we have "travelled to numerous planets", I simply corrected your statement that was probably made from the part of your brain suffering from liquefactive necrosis, cause you were wrong. sorry.    Not trying to be a jerk, just pointing out that you were wrong, calm down.

apoptosis is not necrosis, fail again.

I know the difference, which is why I put "apoptosis" in quotes   
I'm more like liquefactive

based on how uptight you are, I'd say you're more like gangrenous, you know, the one in between the toes of diabetic pts  "

we as a race have travelled to many planets, why are machines not considered "we", why are you using this defintion, perhaps because it suits your need.I am not wrong, we have travelled to many planets, the op claimed the only place we can visit is the moon, this is false.

you haven't corrected my statment because we have travelled to numerous planets, we have landed on the moon in person and with machine on mars. We have sent many crafts and probes to other planets. Not sure why travelled means land, but thats not what i implied and i'm not sure why landed machinery that can be operated on earth or from craft doesn't count as landing either. Read the opening statment again and tell me what you think he is implying.