buy the latest issue of skeptic magazine and read the 2012 article
http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/
I would rather not read Skeptic magazine so symbolicly, the way the cover of that very late post 2008 up to date issue of Skeptic magazine was illustrated to look, I would say that there is too much emphasis being placed on the year 2012 being the name of a 2009 movie three years ahead of this one.
What is it about 2009 that already has a movie called 2012 in a hypothetical fictional look into three next years that have been too anticipated when this year is still here despite the feeling that such a short lived amount of fall months in this holiday season of 2009?
Can Any Scientologist explain that or can the difference between science and religion be used to explain that or does the two words leap year have a second definition that causes a lot of reinterpretation from what is said to be a leap year on the added 29th of February four years apart. The extra meaning of a leap year might have more importance outside the recognition of the Gregorian calendar from what a February leap year has been along with the fact that 2012 is supposed to be another Gregorian calendar leap year despite the fact or fiction that the Mayan calendar, not the Gregorian calendar, is believed to be the reason why 2012 is being explained to be the Nostradamus type of unproven prophecy by any of the experts that make their living off of trying to be like Nostradamus.