ok
I guess it's because all the usually suspects who were telling us how great Bush was are the same guys that are telling us how bad Obama is.
Ok - then watch the video. Is two emails out of a thousand the basis for an accusation of fraud? As for giving away data - scientists are always touchy on that - it's more than probably useless to anyone who is not a climatologists anyway.
Scientists require rigorous proof and research to prove/disprove any established theory. If you haven't got the proof/research you bet you will be "laughed out of class" as you should be.
Ask Al Gore. Personally I see this as a good thing because it was making the issue a left versus right one.
No comment.
1) how is making data public giving it away? I guess it would be to much to ask to actually see the data that is going to change the very fabric of our way of life. And what makes you think you have to be a rocket scientist to look at data and determine if the temp is going up down or staying the same?
2) So a conscensus is fact? since when, science is based on fact not well enough of think the moon is indeed made of green cheese so take our word for it.
3) My guess is he is dumping all his stock in the carbon credit market before it goes belly up.
Is it a conspiracy, not enough information to determine that yet, but it has become painfully obvious that this is based on wealth, why else would there be a market for carbon credits? So as long as you are wealthy enough you can do whatever you want with impunity?
Got news for you, when you are living in your government mandated hobble, eating your government mandated soilent green freezing your ass off because the cost to heat said hobble has quadrupled you aren't going to give a fuck about that spotted owl on the endangered species list. You be having that little bastard for dinner.