Author Topic: Shawn Ray VS. Dexter Jackson (Read 91224 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #225 on:** December 19, 2009, 01:36:15 PM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on December 19, 2009, 02:20:49 AM

exactly

where has shawn ever looked as good as these 4 pics.

Sorry Shawn

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #226 on:** December 19, 2009, 01:42:34 PM »

Bigger , wider and just as hard

MCWAY · « **Reply #227 on:** December 19, 2009, 11:39:03 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on December 18, 2009, 11:27:17 AM

dexter beat Mr. Levrone at the 2003 O because he tore his tricep a few weeks earlier, overall he was a good 20 lbs smaller than normal

he beat him at a few spring shows too in the 2000's, he didn't take those seriously at all i think he just wanted to collect an easy paycheck

if this is a prime Levrone, than I guess trevor berbick beat a prime Ali

E

And whose problem is that?

The simple fact is Jackson beat many of the same guys that Ray faced and he beat them when they were still viable competitors at the Olympia level.

Plus, he's beaten guys MUCH LARGER than himself, namely Schlierkamp, Freeman, and Wolf.

And, of course, he pulled off the upset in 2008, getting past Cutler for the Olympia title.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #228 on:** December 20, 2009, 02:25:03 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 19, 2009, 05:04:08 AM

actually, he looked that good on a regular basis:

thats why shawn did well in contests where dexter, even in his Mr. O shape, would not have beaten shawn, dorian, ronnie etc. when they were in top form

you are delusional.

see those 4 other pics by nd - a complete physique from every angle.

shawn has never looked that good.

Figo · « **Reply #229 on:** December 20, 2009, 07:04:07 AM »

can Dex pull off a shot like this without looking gay?
(no homo)

Figo · « **Reply #230 on:** December 20, 2009, 07:05:50 AM »

even changing a tire, Shawn was the man

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #231 on:** December 20, 2009, 07:07:31 AM »

Quote from: Figo on December 20, 2009, 07:05:50 AM

even changing a tire, Shawn was the man

Oh brother Team Nasser will start posting pics of Nassers changing tires now to offset this.

Figo · « **Reply #232 on:** December 20, 2009, 07:09:48 AM »

Quote from: Mr Nobody on December 20, 2009, 07:07:31 AM

Oh brother Team Nasser will start posting pics of Nassers changing tires now to offset this.

Probably easier to find a pic of him changing the oil...

Figo · « **Reply #233 on:** December 20, 2009, 07:12:49 AM »

Shawn had 1 of the best side chests ever

Hulkster · « **Reply #234 on:** December 20, 2009, 07:55:19 AM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on December 20, 2009, 02:25:03 AM

you are delusional.

see those 4 other pics by nd - a complete physique from every angle.

shawn has never looked that good.

LOL

yeah sure:

Wiggs · « **Reply #235 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:01:19 AM »

Shawn has a better face (no homo)...Dex looks like roach and shawn in his best days was a great looking guy...unfortunately, Olympias = Dex 1, Shawn 0. Street Cred, Dex = 100, Shawn -100 (blame mom).

Hulkster · « **Reply #236 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:08:13 AM »

you know what is really funny and a testiment to how much better shawn was than dexter?

answer: his 1987 nationals rear double bi was better than Dexter's Mr. O winning rear double bi:

thats just how much better shawn was:

nice try dexter nuthuggers, but you lose:

Hulkster · « **Reply #237 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:09:09 AM »

dex could not come close

big14 · « **Reply #238 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:23:03 AM »

Dex all the way.
I used to think they were pretty close.
Shawn have droopy small shoulders
and a narrow build.

Shawn: H frame small, stringy.
Dex: X frame bigger, fuller, freakier.

We can go on forever.
Some say Shawn and some say Dex.
Apples and peanuts whatever you like.

big14 · « **Reply #239 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:27:03 AM »

Quote from: Figo on December 20, 2009, 07:04:07 AM

can Dex pull off a shot like this without looking gay?
(no homo)

That shot look monster gay

calfzilla · « **Reply #240 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:27:18 AM »

This thread will never end. Shawn was better, period. Can't believe all these schmoes who think Dex is better.

Hulkster · « **Reply #241 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:48:28 AM »

Quote from: calfzilla on December 20, 2009, 08:27:18 AM

This thread will never end. Shawn was better, period. Can't believe all these schmoes who think Dex is better.

I am not surprised. many people in this sport have no clue.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #242 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:58:38 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 20, 2009, 08:48:28 AM

I am not surprised. many people in this sport have no clue.

Irony alert

Dexter has more muscular bulk , equal if not better conditioning , and he's wider the criteria favor's Dexter , you can't dispute this

Fatpanda · « **Reply #243 on:** December 20, 2009, 08:59:45 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 20, 2009, 08:08:13 AM

you know what is really funny and a testiment to how much better shawn was than dexter?

answer: his 1987 nationals rear double bi was better than Dexter's Mr. O winning rear double bi:

thats just how much better shawn was:

nice try dexter nuthuggers, but you lose:

better in what way ? ripped ultra lean conditioning perhaps yes - but what about mass ? and width, thickness, etc

if you really believe that conditioning is more important than mass, width, etc etc then that shot is also better than all of ronnies rear double bi shots.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #244 on:** December 20, 2009, 09:02:30 AM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on December 20, 2009, 08:59:45 AM

better in what way ? ripped ultra lean conditioning perhaps yes - but what about mass ? and width, thickness, etc

if you really believe that conditioning is more important than mass, width, etc etc then that shot is also better than all of ronnies rear double bi shots.

He's hopeless

Dexter is probably the exact same height and it's obvious he carries more mass , has equal if not better conditioning , and he has much better width and less balance issues not but much but I think Dex has him there as well

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #245 on:** December 20, 2009, 09:04:35 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on December 20, 2009, 08:08:13 AM

you know what is really funny and a testiment to how much better shawn was than dexter?

answer: his 1987 nationals rear double bi was better than Dexter's Mr. O winning rear double bi:

thats just how much better shawn was:

nice try dexter nuthuggers, but you lose:

Great pic shows how little he improved over his career

Fatpanda · « **Reply #246 on:** December 20, 2009, 09:06:20 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 20, 2009, 09:04:35 AM

Great pic shows how little he improved over his career

Figo · « **Reply #247 on:** December 20, 2009, 10:18:52 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 20, 2009, 09:04:35 AM

Great pic shows how little he improved over his career

he peaked early...

wes · « **Reply #248 on:** December 20, 2009, 10:27:05 AM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #249 on:** December 20, 2009, 10:28:23 AM »

^

poor dex. a guy who never won the O. looks much better than he ever did...