Author Topic: Sarah Palin is asked if she would debate Al Gore on climate change (Read 4766 times)

blacken700 · « **on:** December 12, 2009, 05:55:37 AM »

the real travesty is that she gets a platform at all. that she gets treated as though what she knows or thinks about global warming even really matters Her response: "not if it's a 'conventional' debate." Meaning she wants to have a "MAVERICK" debate, where you get to make up your own questions and your own answers, and there are no rules about tropes, canards or winks. and a talent competition! with fancy pageant walking!

OK now simpletons come to her rescue!

240 is Back · « **Reply #1 on:** December 12, 2009, 06:44:49 AM »

Palin refused to follow rules in the 1 debate she participated in.

imagine what will happen if she runs in 2012... every GOP contender debate, she'll just be saying "Now, (host), I'd like to "go rogue" for a minute and talk about something more important than your question..."

And her 20% base will giggle while jerking off and celebrate her marverick-y-ness. Let them have their fun. Most of them don't have the joy of an education, an understanding of simple science, or all of their teeth...

Straw Man · « **Reply #2 on:** December 12, 2009, 06:48:13 AM »

I'm sure if the money were right she'd do just about anything

she's just that kind of gal

know what I mean?

You Betcha

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #3 on:** December 12, 2009, 07:23:58 AM »

Sorry to rain on the little hate-fest but do you idiots realize that the High Priest of the Global Warming Messianic Cult, Al Gore, himself refuses to debate anyone on this issue?

blacken700 · « **Reply #4 on:** December 12, 2009, 07:28:19 AM »

do you idiot realize that the post is about palin being asked if she would debate

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #5 on:** December 12, 2009, 07:33:00 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on December 12, 2009, 07:28:19 AM

do you idiot realize that the post is about palin being asked if she would debate

And she answered it saying she would so long as it was fair and not run by the Cult Followers and Devotees to the Messianic Cult known as AGW.

blacken700 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 12, 2009, 07:35:06 AM »

and i repeat Her response: "not if it's a 'conventional' debate." Meaning she wants to have a "MAVERICK" debate, where you get to make up your own questions and your own answers, and there are no rules about tropes, canards or winks. and a talent competition! with fancy pageant walking! OK now simpletons come to her rescue!

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #7 on:** December 12, 2009, 07:43:06 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on December 12, 2009, 07:35:06 AM

and i repeat Her response: "not if it's a 'conventional' debate." Meaning she wants to have a "MAVERICK" debate, where you get to make up your own questions and your own answers, and there are no rules about tropes, canards or winks. and a talent competition! with fancy pageant walking! OK now simpletons come to her rescue!

She explicitly said if it was run by his friends.

Geez dude - WTF is wrong with you and why wont the high priest Al Gore debate anyone on this sham of an issue?

blacken700 · « **Reply #8 on:** December 12, 2009, 08:01:25 AM »

you and the minority of people think its a sham sorry to rain on your parade

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #9 on:** December 12, 2009, 08:05:50 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on December 12, 2009, 08:01:25 AM

you and the minority of people think its a sham sorry to rain on your parade

It is a sham and you are a product of MSM brainwashing and hype.

Give up all your assets, cash, to the Church you belong to, I am sure al Gore will grant you salvation for your environmental sins.

The climate is always changing, before we were herwe, while we are here, and after we will be long gone.

This insane push for people to jump off the cliff because the High Priest of the Cult said so, no different than the Jim Jones Cult, is no different than any other scam in history.

blacken700 · « **Reply #10 on:** December 12, 2009, 08:09:18 AM »

i don't care what gore says i will go with the majority of scientist

240 is Back · « **Reply #11 on:** December 12, 2009, 09:11:55 AM »

LMAO.... Palin now rejects conventional debates. This is gonna be hilarious in 2011 when she derails every debate with run-on sentences about why the rules don't apply to her.

OzmO · « **Reply #12 on:** December 12, 2009, 09:17:04 AM »

The republican "Virgin Mary" side show continues.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #13 on:** December 12, 2009, 09:25:39 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on December 12, 2009, 09:11:55 AM

LMAO.... Palin now rejects conventional debates. This is gonna be hilarious in 2011 when she derails every debate with run-on sentences about why the rules don't apply to her.

SHE SAID "WITH HIS FRIENDS SETTING IT UP"

240 - you hear what you want to hear bro.

240 is Back · « **Reply #14 on:** December 12, 2009, 09:27:13 AM »

of course she shouldn't do a debate with his friends setting it up.

but i think we all know palin will only be doing 'fre flowing' debates set up by fox news for the next 3 years

And she'll find a way to use a crisis to cancel any NBC debates, you watch

Bindare_Dundat · « **Reply #15 on:** December 12, 2009, 09:37:19 AM »

Quote from: OzmO on December 12, 2009, 09:17:04 AM

The republican "Virgin Mary" side show continues.

lol

Skip8282 · « **Reply #16 on:** December 12, 2009, 10:27:10 AM »

Gore won't debate at all, but he gets a pass.

Palin will debate, just not on their terms, but she's an idiot.

Yeah, makes total sense.

Straw Man · « **Reply #17 on:** December 12, 2009, 11:01:29 AM »

It would make no sense for Gore to debate Palin

Gore would only be legitimizing what is for all intents and purposes a fringe candidate.

Palin would gain in stature just by being on the same stage as Gore

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #18 on:** December 12, 2009, 11:05:16 AM »

Quote from: Straw Man on December 12, 2009, 11:01:29 AM

It would make no sense for Gore to debate Palin

Gore would only be legitimizing what is for all intents and purposes a fringe candidate.

Palin would gain in stature just by being on the same stage as Gore

Yeah, whatever Straw.

Straw Man · « **Reply #19 on:** December 12, 2009, 11:12:29 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on December 12, 2009, 11:05:16 AM

Yeah, whatever Straw.

what's your point?

Gore is a 2 time VP, former Senator and Nobel Prize winner

Outside of a fringe group of TeaBaggers Palin is a laughing stock and a walking punchline

Gore's gravitas would only help Palin appear to be a legitimate voice rather than a crackpot that she is

MB_722 · « **Reply #20 on:** December 12, 2009, 11:14:34 AM »

read this ... its about putin [not a a fan of his]... this isn't a russia bad america good type of deal. just an example all politicians are the same.

Reload this Page Apparently Putin doesn't like to be surprised by any question.
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=170422

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #21 on:** December 12, 2009, 11:18:15 AM »

Just goes to show how irrelevent the Nobel Prize has become.

One goes to a guy who uses phony science to get an award.

The other goes there and gives a speech on war and is only there because if his skin color.

Did I mention arafat?

Straw Man · « **Reply #22 on:** December 12, 2009, 11:41:48 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on December 12, 2009, 11:18:15 AM

Just goes to show how irrelevent the Nobel Prize has become.

One goes to a guy who uses phony science to get an award.

The other goes there and gives a speech on war and is only there because if his skin color.

Did I mention arafat?

wow - it usually takes you longer to devolve into meaningless ramblings

Skip8282 · « **Reply #23 on:** December 12, 2009, 03:26:25 PM »

Quote from: Straw Man on December 12, 2009, 11:01:29 AM

It would make no sense for Gore to debate Palin

Gore would only be legitimizing what is for all intents and purposes a fringe candidate.

Palin would gain in stature just by being on the same stage as Gore

Why not just have a debate and let people decide for themselves?

I don't think anybody who's sold millions of copies of books and is an endless topic for conversation (obviously on this board), is on the "fringe". She may very well be unelectable, but what's wrong with hearing her out and letting people decide for themselves?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #24 on:** December 12, 2009, 03:31:59 PM »

Quote from: Skip8282 on December 12, 2009, 03:26:25 PM

Why not just have a debate and let people decide for themselves?

I don't think anybody who's sold millions of copies of books and is an endless topic for conversation (obviously on this board), is on the "fringe". She may very well be unelectable, but what's wrong with hearing her out and letting people decide for themselves?

Many of us have felt the same way about Al Gore and not debating anyone regarding his theories.

Look Skip - Palin is quickly gaining popularity. She has massive star power. If she tightens up her game, the dems know she will be a force of nature since she connects with normal people.

Al Gore is completely FOS on this issue, just like he was on 99% of everything else.

If Palin gets on a stage with him, she will come away the winner by default. Remember how the idiot GWB made Gore look like a fool in the debates?

Gore is his own worst enemy. He is a clown, a fool, convinced of his own genius, and would never agree to allow Palin to make a fool of him.