Author Topic: The final decison: Ronnie 2001 ASC Vs. Dorian 1993 who would win? (Read 5484 times)

ag2 · « **on:** December 22, 2009, 07:25:22 PM »

Discuss Bitches

marty31672 · « **Reply #1 on:** December 22, 2009, 07:26:12 PM »

Ronnie by TKO, Round 1

cross-of-iron · « **Reply #2 on:** December 22, 2009, 07:52:23 PM »

jesus fucking christ

Neptune100 · « **Reply #3 on:** December 22, 2009, 07:57:29 PM »

easy. Ronnie by a mile.

Option D · « **Reply #4 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:10:02 PM »

Quote from: ag2 on December 22, 2009, 07:25:22 PM

Discuss Bitches

look here asswhipe there is a thousand plus page thread dedicated to this...take this shit there...holy lord

Hulkster · « **Reply #5 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:10:44 PM »

no comparison. ronnie easily.

but I think we need more discussion on this..

even though he looked better at the 1999 Olympia..

chaos · « **Reply #6 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:11:36 PM »

Quote from: big_mal on December 22, 2009, 08:10:02 PM

look here asswhipe there is a thousand plus page thread dedicated to this...take this shit there...holy lord

This thread starter is the exact reason I should have admin powers here.

EL Mariachi · « **Reply #7 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:12:03 PM »

whats so great about the last pic of ronnie, shape looks like dogshit

Hulkster · « **Reply #8 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:15:19 PM »

few would agree that it looks like dogshit

besides, its a lot better than 93 dorian's shape:

Option D · « **Reply #9 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:20:01 PM »

QUE ND....IN 5..........4............ .3..............2....... .....1...........

bigbobs · « **Reply #10 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:21:40 PM »

But Hulkster many "experts" apparently claim that 2001 AC was Ronnie's best, and I believe Ronnie said 98 Olympia was his best? How do you get 99 Olympia?

Royal Lion · « **Reply #11 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:44:29 PM »

Because Hulkster is so delusional that he literally believes that he knows Ronnie better than the experts, or even Ronnie himself knows Ronnie. And, nice front relaxed there of Dorian, loser!

Grape Ape · « **Reply #12 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:45:27 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on December 22, 2009, 08:21:40 PM

But Hulkster many "experts" apparently claim that 2001 AC was Ronnie's best, and I believe Ronnie said 98 Olympia was his best? How do you get 99 Olympia?

From his posting history, it appears he looks a few shots in 99 where Ronnie looks absolutely amazing and ignores everything else, and makes excuses for any evidence that he can't refute.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #13 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:47:07 PM »

It would be close, but Dorian would prevail IMO.

Shockwave · « **Reply #14 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:48:20 PM »

I love how Hulkster compeletly ignores good pics of Dorian... hes that delusional that he truly manages to not acknowledge there existance. It really undermines his arguments to continually post the same 3 or 4 shitty pics and claim that is how Dorian always looked.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #15 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:48:36 PM »

Dorian > Ronnie

Shockwave · « **Reply #16 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:49:41 PM »

Quote from: Grape Ape on December 22, 2009, 08:45:27 PM

From his posting history, it appears he looks a few shots in 99 where Ronnie looks absolutely amazing and ignores everything else, and makes excuses for any evidence that he can't refute.

That pretty much his MO. But it works for everything. He makes his opinion based on his opinion, and then makes excuses why his opinion is Fact.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #17 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:50:39 PM »

Quote from: Shockwave on December 22, 2009, 08:48:20 PM

I love how Hulkster compeletly ignores good pics of Dorian... hes that delusional that he truly manages to not acknowledge there existance. It really undermines his arguments to continually post the same 3 or 4 shitty pics and claim that is how Dorian always looked.

Of course he does....it's the only way he can support his bullshit claims. Remember, we should all believe Hulkster over Ronnie himself when it comes to which year was Ronnie's best.

Shockwave · « **Reply #18 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:51:50 PM »

Quote from: Royal Lion on December 22, 2009, 08:50:39 PM

Of course he does....it's the only way he can support his bullshit claims. Remember, we should all believe Hulkster over Ronnie himself when it comes to which year was Ronnie's best.

Sometimes I think Hulkster and Pumpster were the same poster. lol.

Grape Ape · « **Reply #19 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:54:29 PM »

Quote from: Shockwave on December 22, 2009, 08:49:41 PM

That pretty much his MO. But it works for everything. He makes his opinion based on his opinion, and then makes excuses why his opinion is Fact.

The way he lays out an argument, he would lose a Ronnie vs. Kamali debate.

The thing is, I was a fan of both Dorian and Ronnie, but reading Hulkster's/Pumpster's crap about them all the time made me start to dislike Coleman for no good reason.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #20 on:** December 22, 2009, 08:58:45 PM »

Quote from: Grape Ape on December 22, 2009, 08:54:29 PM

The way he lays out an argument, he would lose a Ronnie vs. Kamali debate.

The thing is, I was a fan of both Dorian and Ronnie, but reading Hulkster's/Pumpster's crap about them all the time made me start to dislike Coleman for no good reason.

Lol, I totally agree. I have always been a fan of both Dorian and Ronnie. Hulkster's stupidity has cast a dark shadow over Ronnie on here though...it's actually kind of sad.

Hulkster · « **Reply #21 on:** December 22, 2009, 09:01:12 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on December 22, 2009, 08:21:40 PM

But Hulkster many "experts" apparently claim that 2001 AC was Ronnie's best, and I believe Ronnie said 98 Olympia was his best? How do you get 99 Olympia?

for many reasons, the biggest of which is that his gut was much more pronounced at the AC:

he was also just as hard at the 99 O. but 10 pounds bigger.

combine that with smaller gut and you have a better overall shape.

Hulkster · « **Reply #22 on:** December 22, 2009, 09:03:46 PM »

Quote from: Grape Ape on December 22, 2009, 08:45:27 PM

From his posting history, it appears he looks a few shots in 99 where Ronnie looks absolutely amazing and ignores everything else, and makes excuses for any evidence that he can't refute.

LOL a few shots?

how about the whole fucking contest:

http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027

go ahead and watch. then watch the AC vid. he was better in 99, and much better than dorian ever looked.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #23 on:** December 22, 2009, 09:05:04 PM »

So we should discredit all of those who saw him in person at both contests and RONNIE HIMSELF based on your opinion of a video?? And to say he was "much" better than Dorian is bullshit. It would be close, but don't forget that Dorian was heavier and had better conditioning. Cue the same sharpened pics you've been posting for 5+ years now in 5...4...3...2...

Hulkster · « **Reply #24 on:** December 22, 2009, 09:06:03 PM »

I see all the nuthuggers are coming out in full force for this thread LOL

its cool. there isn't anything you can post that can't be refuted by real pics and videos...

bring it on bitches.

but I will have to own your sorry asses later, as I am off to Cozumel for a week of sun, sea and sand.

have fun nuthuggers!