Author Topic: Best physique in the the history of the world  (Read 50753 times)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #100 on: December 27, 2009, 06:48:04 AM »
starting to sound like another troll I know  ;) I don't run ....I correct



haha no i was just pushing you to come.. now mention some of these many..

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16224
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #101 on: December 27, 2009, 06:55:32 AM »
haha no i was just pushing you to come.. now mention some of these many..

Are you implying that Nasser had the best Frond DB of all time?

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #102 on: December 27, 2009, 06:56:00 AM »
Are you implying that Nasser had the best Frond DB of all time?

this is a fact sir!!..

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83905
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #103 on: December 27, 2009, 06:56:48 AM »
haha no i was just pushing you to come.. now mention some of these many..

stop trolling you already know and most of them were already mentioned

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83905
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #104 on: December 27, 2009, 06:58:29 AM »
this is a fact sir!!..

The only thing that's a fact is your implication everything else is bias , ignorance and hero-worship

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #105 on: December 27, 2009, 07:00:42 AM »
The only thing that's a fact is your implication everything else is bias , ignorance and hero-worship

man you CLEARLY said that there are MANY (not one or two) who were/are better than nasser in this pose and i CLEARLY asked you to name some of these MANY.. why dont you answer me in a CLEAR way?!..

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16224
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #106 on: December 27, 2009, 07:01:44 AM »
this is a fact sir!!..

It's hard to believe that a 3rd tier pro like Nasser was unbeatale in a ceratain pose, but he really owns everyone in the thread you posted. Selective image choice I guess.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #107 on: December 27, 2009, 07:06:14 AM »
It's hard to believe that a 3rd tier pro like Nasser was unbeatale in a ceratain pose, but he really owns everyone in the thread you posted. Selective image choice I guess.

man if i wanted to post ''selective'' shots i wouldnt have put him (nasser) beside ronnie at his best at mr. olympia 98!!.. if you noticed well i had posted 2 pics. with each guy beside nasser from 2 diff. shows just to prove my point clearly and to avoid ''guessings'' like yours ::)

now tell me how you consider a mr. olympia runner up and NOC and AC winner a 3rd tier bb??..

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83905
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #108 on: December 27, 2009, 07:10:36 AM »
man you CLEARLY said that there are MANY (not one or two) who were/are better than nasser in this pose and i CLEARLY asked you to name some of these MANY.. why dont you answer me in a CLEAR way?!..

Here is Dillett who is ONE of them who destroys Nasser in this pose

I choose 96 so you can't cry Nasser wasn't around his best

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #109 on: December 27, 2009, 07:14:50 AM »
Here is Dillett who is ONE of them who destroys Nasser in this pose

I choose 96 so you can't cry Nasser wasn't around his best

any other one beside ND sees paul better than nasser here??.. plz guys help me, either ND is blind or i dont know a shit about bb ::)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #110 on: December 27, 2009, 07:17:01 AM »
hey man are you kidding me??!!.. how come you really see paul better here?.. nasser's quads, calves, lats, abs, chest were all better and more proportional!!.. arms are more or less the same!..

IrishMuscle84

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1305
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #111 on: December 27, 2009, 07:19:54 AM »
Women liked him? According to him, (in his book Gorilla Suit), women would often say that his muscles were "gross."

Sorry...even the most aesthetically pleasing physiques of all time, are still unattractive to most women.

I have heard several different women comment on pics of a prime Frank Zane as, "Too big," "Disgusting," Etc etc....
Thats thier "defense mechanism" talking. Especially when they see a well built guy in person. An overwhelming feeling of insecurity and intimidation comes over them, even with guys too. You ever been out somewhere and some dude sees you and notice your well built and starts rubbing thier forearm/bicep pretending they have an itch but what thier really doing is feeling how muscular thier arm is.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16224
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #112 on: December 27, 2009, 07:20:12 AM »
any other one beside ND sees paul better than nasser here??.. plz guys help me, either ND is blind or i dont know a shit about bb ::)

But Dillet hits the pose right.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #113 on: December 27, 2009, 07:22:48 AM »
But Dillet hits the pose right.

do you see nasser hitting it wrong??.. how? can you explain?

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16224
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #114 on: December 27, 2009, 07:23:24 AM »
do you see nasser hitting it wrong??.. how? can you explain?

Nevermind. Just baseless provocation.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #115 on: December 27, 2009, 07:26:54 AM »
now ND could you plz post more pics. from mr. o. 96??.. i need them for the facebook page :P

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #116 on: December 27, 2009, 07:28:43 AM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83905
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #117 on: December 27, 2009, 07:37:22 AM »
any other one beside ND sees paul better than nasser here??.. plz guys help me, either ND is blind or i dont know a shit about bb ::)

Hahahahah you're both blind and don't know shit about bodybuilding ( nothing new )

Let me school you on how contests are judged , ALL rounds are physique rounds which means all of the criteria is assessed as a whole in any particular pose , which means balance & proportion are assessed who has the better balance & proportion? Paul does he has a much better natural structure wider clavicles , smaller joints , narrow waist & hips , better proportion between muscles , better upper & lower body balance , he doesn't have Nasser's short legs or long torso and highish lats , Paul wins this part of the pose

Now mind you it's not just parts it's the whole that wins , Muscular Bulk who wins? well Nasser is huge but so is Paul in fact Paul physically looks wider & bigger but it doesn't matter even if Nasser carried more Bulk because Shawn beat him despite being much lighter , but Nasser isn't outsizing Paul advantage Dillett

Density & dryness , Paul like Nasser was always better conditioned from the front compared to the back , I honestly don't see an advantage for either in this department so I'll say it's a push

Posing & presentation , neither were great posers ( ironically ) but as far as posing in this particular pose Paul wins and why? All rounds are physique rounds so all the criteria is assessed in this pose as well as any others , Paul is hitting the pose correctly on a base level , Nasser always holds his hands way to high in this pose , Paul is textbook pose better balance & proportion  , smaller waist & hips bigger arms , more size , Paul beats Nasser in this pose , remember it's the sum of all the criteria and Paul meets ALL of it better


Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #118 on: December 27, 2009, 07:44:54 AM »
Hahahahah you're both blind and don't know shit about bodybuilding ( nothing new )

Let me school you on how contests are judged , ALL rounds are physique rounds which means all of the criteria is assessed as a whole in any particular pose , which means balance & proportion are assessed who has the better balance & proportion? Paul does he has a much better natural structure wider clavicles , smaller joints , narrow waist & hips , better proportion between muscles , better upper & lower body balance , he doesn't have Nasser's short legs or long torso and highish lats , Paul wins this part of the pose

Now mind you it's not just parts it's the whole that wins , Muscular Bulk who wins? well Nasser is huge but so is Paul in fact Paul physically looks wider & bigger but it doesn't matter even if Nasser carried more Bulk because Shawn beat him despite being much lighter , but Nasser isn't outsizing Paul advantage Dillett

Density & dryness , Paul like Nasser was always better conditioned from the front compared to the back , I honestly don't see an advantage for either in this department so I'll say it's a push

Posing & presentation , neither were great posers ( ironically ) but as far as posing in this particular pose Paul wins and why? All rounds are physique rounds so all the criteria is assessed in this pose as well as any others , Paul is hitting the pose correctly on a base level , Nasser always holds his hands way to high in this pose , Paul is textbook pose better balance & proportion  , smaller waist & hips bigger arms , more size , Paul beats Nasser in this pose , remember it's the sum of all the criteria and Paul meets ALL of it better



 ::) ::) ::) ::)

so according to you nasser's lats are higher than dillett's.. mmm ok ND plz take a rest, you really need it, you have started to imagine things!!.. i really have nothing more to say but i am sure anyone who has some sense sees how nasser is clearly better than paul in this pose!!.. so according to you paul beats nasser in this pose,.. who else, you said ''many'' ::)

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #119 on: December 27, 2009, 07:48:20 AM »
Hahahahah you're both blind and don't know shit about bodybuilding ( nothing new )




Posing & presentation , neither were great posers ( ironically ) but as far as posing in this particular pose Paul wins and why? All rounds are physique rounds so all the criteria is assessed in this pose as well as any others , Paul is hitting the pose correctly on a base level , Nasser always holds his hands way to high in this pose , Paul is textbook pose better balance & proportion  , smaller waist & hips bigger arms , more size , Paul beats Nasser in this pose , remember it's the sum of all the criteria and Paul meets ALL of it better


Sorry but Paul and Pavol were the worst posers in the history of bodybuilding.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83905
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #120 on: December 27, 2009, 07:48:38 AM »
hey man are you kidding me??!!.. how come you really see paul better here?.. nasser's quads, calves, lats, abs, chest were all better and more proportional!!.. arms are more or less the same!..

You're like Hulkster always trying to say this part is better and this one is NOT how it works , you cherry pick for what parts YOU like/think are better and think that's all that's in a pose again NOT how it works

must take into consideration leg length in relation to the torso ( Nasser short legs effects his balance & proportion ) long torso ( again effects the whole pose ) upper/lower body balance , clavicle width ( Dillet by a country mile ) forearms in relation to biceps/triceps , now couple all that with muscular bulk , density & drynesness , posing & presentation it ALL must be combined at once it's clear when you know how things are judged that Nasser doesn't win this pose

And Nasser's quads and calves aren't better than Dilletts go see an eye Dr post haste or lats from the front , abs sure

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #121 on: December 27, 2009, 07:51:00 AM »
You're like Hulkster always trying to say this part is better and this one is NOT how it works , you cherry pick for what parts YOU like/think are better and think that's all that's in a pose again NOT how it works

must take into consideration leg length in relation to the torso ( Nasser short legs effects his balance & proportion ) long torso ( again effects the whole pose ) upper/lower body balance , clavicle width ( Dillet by a country mile ) forearms in relation to biceps/triceps , now couple all that with muscular bulk , density & drynesness , posing & presentation it ALL must be combined at once it's clear when you know how things are judged that Nasser doesn't win this pose

And Nasser's quads and calves aren't better than Dilletts go see an eye Dr post haste or lats from the front , abs sure

so nasser's torso is long and paul's is not? :-\

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83905
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #122 on: December 27, 2009, 07:54:26 AM »
so nasser's torso is long and paul's is not? :-\

That's all you comment on?  ??? Yes Nasser's torso is long and Pauls isn't , Nasser has a torso like Levrone & Shawn Ray and Lee Preist , etc long with short legs not ideal balance & proportion but can be overcome it's all dependent on who you're competing with

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83905
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #123 on: December 27, 2009, 07:55:53 AM »
Sorry but Paul and Pavol were the worst posers in the history of bodybuilding.

I addressed that , but in this particular pose Paul gets it right , the back poses sucked for Paul

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Best physique in the the history of the world
« Reply #124 on: December 27, 2009, 08:03:53 AM »
I addressed that , but in this particular pose Paul gets it right , the back poses sucked for Paul
The problem with Paul wasn't about hitting te pose right , it was that  he couldn't hold a pose for more than 0.0000005 sec.