Author Topic: Fantastic  (Read 585 times)

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Fantastic
« on: January 03, 2010, 10:12:09 PM »
Yummy! Ammonia-Treated Pink Slime Now in Most U.S. Ground Beef


You're not going to believe what you've been eating the last few years (thanks, Bush! thanks meat industry lobbyists!) when you eat a McDonald's burger (or the hamburger patties in kids' school lunches) or buy conventional ground meat at your supermarket:

According to today's New York Times, The "majority of hamburger" now sold in the U.S. now contains fatty slaughterhouse trimmings "the industry once relegated to pet food and cooking oil," "typically including most of the material from the outer surfaces of the carcass" that contains "larger microbiological populations."

This "nasty pink slime," as one FDA microbiologist called it, is now wrung in a centrifuge to remove the fat, and then treated with AMMONIA to "retard spoilage," and turned into "a mashlike substance frozen into blocks or chips".

Thus saving THREE CENTS a pound off production costs. And making the company, Beef Products Inc., a fortune. $440 million/year in revenue. Ain't that something?

jennifer poole's diary :: ::
 
And to emphasize: this pink slime isn't just in fast food burgers or free lunches for poor kids:

With the U.S.D.A.’s stamp of approval, the company’s processed beef has become a mainstay in America’s hamburgers. McDonald’s, Burger King and other fast-food giants use it as a component in ground beef, as do grocery chains. The federal school lunch program used an estimated 5.5 million pounds of the processed beef last year alone.

Bush's U.S.D.A. also allowed these "innovators" to get away with listing the ammonia as "a processing agent" instead of by name. And they also OKd the processing method -- and later exempted the hamburger from routine testing of meat sold to the general public -- strictly based on the company's claims of safety, which were not backed by any independent testing.

Because the ammonia taste was so bad ("It was frozen, but you could still smell ammonia," said Dr. Charles Tant, a Georgia agriculture department official. "I’ve never seen anything like it.") the company started using a less alkaline ammonia treatment, and now we know -- thanks to testing done for the school lunch program -- that the nasty stuff isn't even reliably killing the pathogens.
 

But government and industry records obtained by The New York Times show that in testing for the school lunch program, E. coli and salmonella pathogens have been found dozens of times in Beef Products meat, challenging claims by the company and the U.S.D.A. about the effectiveness of the treatment. Since 2005, E. coli has been found 3 times and salmonella 48 times, including back-to-back incidents in August in which two 27,000-pound batches were found to be contaminated. The meat was caught before reaching lunch-rooms trays.

In July, school lunch officials temporarily banned their hamburger makers from using meat from a Beef Products facility in Kansas because of salmonella — the third suspension in three years, records show. Yet the facility remained approved by the U.S.D.A. for other customers.

Presented by The Times with the school lunch test results, top [U.S.D.A.] department officials said they were not aware of what their colleagues in the lunch program had been finding for years.

The New York Times article today has a rather innocuous headline, "Safety of beef processing method is questioned."

I'd say this quote from the U.S.D.A. department microbiologist, Gerald Zirnstein, who called the processed beef "pink slime" in a 2002 e-mail message to colleagues, represents the situation better: "I do not consider the stuff to be ground beef, and I consider allowing it in ground beef to be a form of fraudulent labeling."

cont... http://www.alternet.org/story/144904/yummy!_ammonia-treated_pink_slime_now_in_most_u.s._ground_beef/

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Fantastic
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2010, 02:54:59 PM »
I guess my question is, does this also apply to Organic beef?  Or is there no escape?

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Fantastic
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2010, 04:43:14 PM »
Like me, ...they are probably vegetarian.   :D

Look at the Monsanto cafeterias... they don't contain any GM Frankenfoods... strictly organic.
they don't dare eat the crap they create for mass public consumption.
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Fantastic
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2010, 04:47:44 PM »
wait wait wait... can you prove that?  It would be an epic owning.

There's a YouTube out there, and plenty of documentatiion to support it.
You'll have to find it on your own. I can't be bothered to search for it.
w

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: Fantastic
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2010, 04:57:21 PM »
BWHAHAHAhahahahahahahaha hah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




"Monsanto Eatery Bans Altered Food"

Associated Press
December 21, 1999

LONDON (AP) -- Genetically modified food has been banned from the staff cafeteria at Monsanto Co.'s UK headquarters by the company's own caterer, Monsanto confirmed Tuesday.

Granada Food Services, whose customers include Monsanto's High Wycombe office near London, recently told clients it would not supply food containing genetically modified soya or maize due to customer concerns.

In a statement to clients, Granada said the move was designed ``to ensure that you, the customer, can feel confident in the food we serve.''

Genetic engineering involves splicing a single gene from one organism to another. Genetically modified products, including Monsanto's genetically engineered corn, have recently met with safety concerns in parts of Europe and Asia.

In October, the European Union adopted new marketing rules requiring companies to label food as genetically modified if more than one percent of the product contains genetically modified organisms. Granada's statement said the ban also brings the company into compliance with the new regulations.

Monsanto played down the staff cafeteria policy, and denied it was an embarrassment to have a genetically modified food ban at the head office of a company manufacturing genetically modified crop seeds.

``We believe in choice. At our Cambridge restaurant the notice says some products may contain genetically modified organisms because our staff are happy to eat foods sprayed with fewer chemicals,'' said Tony Combes, Monsanto's director of corporate affairs.

Combes also pointed out that Granada's ban was a blanket ban covering all of its customers and did not target Monsanto specifically.

``It has nothing to do with us really,'' said Combes.

Opponents of genetically modified food said they believe the ban showed a lack of confidence in Monsanto, however.

``The public has made its concerns about GM ingredients very clear. Now it appears that even Monsanto's own catering firm has no confidence in this new technology,'' said Adrian Bebb, food campaigner at Friends of the Earth.

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for research and educational purposes only. **


SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Fantastic
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2010, 05:01:17 PM »
wait wait wait... can you prove that?  It would be an epic owning.

You can watch the documentary THE WORLD ACCORDING TO MONSANTO..It tells you that in there.
C

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Fantastic
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2010, 05:11:07 PM »
That's fucked up.  My Organic Chem professor got me paranoid about all the shit they put in our foods so I'm not completely convinced that their processes are "harmless" to people.  Just because we can't show a direct causal relationship doesn't alleviate my worry.

Now I read everything, but I wish there was full disclosure.  Not when it's "more than 1%" or something dumb like that.  I want full disclosure of all additives, chemicals used, etc.