Author Topic: Do the math!!!! We lost 840,000 jobs not 85k.  (Read 516 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41761
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Do the math!!!! We lost 840,000 jobs not 85k.
« on: January 08, 2010, 12:16:59 PM »
85,000? We’re Missing a Million of Them!
January 8th, 2010
By David Goldman
www.businessinsider.com

________________________ ___________________-

No, Virginia: There isn’t a Santa Clause, and even if there is, he didn’t bring an employment recovery for Christmas. But the household data in many ways are far more concerning than the establishment data, which show an 85,000 drop in December payrolls.

A far more disturbing number (in Table A-1 of today’s BLS release) shows that “persons not in the labor force” increased by about 840,000 between November and December, from 83,022 to 83,865. That’s seasonally-adjusted; unadjusted, the number is closer to a million. Correspondingly, the total size of the civilian labor force fell from 153,720 to 153,059 between November and December.
What happened to the million Americans who went missing from the BLS definition of the labor force in the single month of December? They are the “long-term discouraged” or whatever, those whose prospects of finding a job are so poor that they have stopped looking.

This entry was posted on Friday, January 8th, 2010 at 9:11 am and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Inner Workings Copyright 2008-2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.           

________________________ ________________________ -

Business Insider is a really good site for some damn truth. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41761
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Do the math!!!! We lost 840,000 jobs not 85k.
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2010, 01:01:29 PM »
James Pethokoukis
Political Risk
» See all analysis and opinion9 reasons why the Dec. jobs report is bad news for Dems
Jan 8, 2010 10:33 EST
2010 election | Obamanomics | unemployment

________________________ ________________________ ____________________-


Talk about one last gasp from the horrible year that was 2009. On the political front, the December jobs numbers were terrible news for the White House and congressional Democrats in a midterm election year. Here’s how it plays out:

1. Remember this simple formula: Unemployment drives presidential approval numbers and presidential approval numbers drive midterm election results.

2. President Barack Obama’s approval numbers are hovering just a tick below 50 percent. Since 1962, the average House midterm loss for the president’s party when his approval is sub-50 percent is 41 seats. The GOP needs 40 to take the House.

3. And make no mistake, the December unemployment numbers were bad both economically and politically. The 85,000 job loss was worse than expected and will be played that way the media. The continuation of a double-digit unemployment also resonates with voters. And not a in a good way.

4. Then will come the second-take stories that will notice the shrinking labor force, which dropped by nearly 700,000 from November. Had it stayed stable for last month, the jobless rate would have been 10.4 percent. Had it stayed stable since August, the jobless rate would be 11 percent!

5. But wait, there’s more! The U-6 rate rate which combines the basic jobless rate, discouraged workers, part-timers-who-would-rather-be-full-tim ers climbed to 17.3 percent. And the average duration of unemployment rose to a record high 29.1 weeks.

6. Also, there is every indication that as the slowly growing economy eventually draws workers back in the labor force, the jobless rate will creep up to new highs. (Big companies remain cautious about hiring, and small biz remains under pressure due to tight capital markets.) The validity of the Obama recovery plan will seriously be cast in doubt.

7. The sickly labor market will also make is that much harder for the White House and Hill Dems to celebrate what is likely to be a brisk upcoming GDP report in the 4-5 percent range. That seems like an abstract number compared to the unemployment rate.

8. Combine a weak labor market – which may appear to be getting worse to voters – with the moribund housing market and rising gas prices, and you got a toxic triple threat that will be poisonous to Democratic incumbents and further drain Obama’s political capital

9. Also, watch how these numbers play with Senate and House Dems thinking about resigning like Chris Dodd and Byron Dorgan.  A big improvement in the jobs numbers might have reassured any worriers that 2010 might not be as tough as some currently think. Now it looks a bit more like the worst fears of Democrats might be realized: losing the House and a half-dozen or more Senate seats.


________________________ ____________________

Come on you libs - keep calling me names.  I will say it again, unless and until obama does a 180 on his agenda things will get worse.