Author Topic: Officers May Be Punished for Ft. Hood Rampage  (Read 440 times)

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Officers May Be Punished for Ft. Hood Rampage
« on: January 15, 2010, 04:11:50 AM »
As many as eight Army officers may be punished for failing to heed warning signs and take action against suspected Fort Hood gunman Maj. Nidal Hasan, a U.S. official said Thursday.

First reported in the Los Angeles Times, an official familiar with a Pentagon review of the case, which will be discussed at a briefing Friday, said the officers who face discipline hold ranks of colonel and below.

The review reportedly found that superiors allowed Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, to advance within the ranks despite his failings to meet physical and professional standards. Hasan avoided physical training, was overweight and frequently late, but was seen by superiors as a rare medical officer and thus avoided corrective action.

"Had those failings been properly adjudicated, he wouldn't have progressed," the official told the Times.

Additionally, the Pentagon review into the deadly rampage that killed 13 found that the Defense Department does not do an adequate job of sharing information about internal personnel, and it focuses more on hunting spies than ferreting out extremists.
 
The Defense Department made public its own review of the rampage earlier this week and found that doctors overseeing Hasan's medical training repeatedly voiced concerns over his strident views on Islam and his inappropriate behavior, yet continued to give him positive performance evaluations that kept him moving through the ranks.

Both reviews seem to point to the fact that supervisors failed to heed their own warnings about an officer ill-suited to be an Army psychiatrist.

Recent statistics show the Army rarely blocks junior officers from promotion, especially in the medical corps.

Hasan showed no signs of being violent or a threat. But parallels have been drawn between the missed signals in his case and those preceding the thwarted Christmas attempt to blow up a Detroit-bound U.S. airliner. President Barack Obama and his top national security aides have acknowledged they had intelligence about the alleged bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, but failed to connect the dots.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,583083,00.html


The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Officers May Be Punished for Ft. Hood Rampage
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2010, 05:00:45 AM »
I wonder how much of the superiors lack of reprimanding him, writing bad evals, etc... was because of fear of "religious persecution?"

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Officers May Be Punished for Ft. Hood Rampage
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2010, 05:22:08 AM »
I wonder how much of the superiors lack of reprimanding him, writing bad evals, etc... was because of fear of "religious persecution?"

Exactly.  This is more CYA and coverup. 

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Officers May Be Punished for Ft. Hood Rampage
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2010, 08:26:47 AM »
Exactly.  This is more CYA and coverup. 


It's a problem, no doubt.  But what's the proposed solution?  You have to be careful in what you write on a persons evaluation and you'd better damn well be able to back it up with hard facts.  "I have a feeling" and "He just doesn't seem right" are not going to cut it.

There's a big time fear of saying, "He may be a Muslim extremist".  Hell, look at what you get on this board when you write that.  It could well cost the evaluator his job or future promotions, or a requirement to attend "sensitivity" training, etc.