Author Topic: Top 20 Backs Of All Time, and How They Got Them! (Read 3933 times)

jupiter23 · « **on:** January 18, 2010, 08:21:40 AM »

why isnt dex in the list? Also stubbs shoulda been number 1 imo

http://www.simplyshredded.com/the-top-20-best-backs-of-all-time.html

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #1 on:** January 18, 2010, 08:24:45 AM »

We had this one before. Columbu is vastly overrated, no signifiant detail, there only for this lat spread. Dorian vs Ronnie is debatable 'til the end of times. Samir should have placed higher than Columbu so should have Robinson. Flex '93 was better than Cutler ever was.

L00n · « **Reply #2 on:** January 18, 2010, 08:25:29 AM »

Columbu before Martinez?

saopl · « **Reply #3 on:** January 18, 2010, 08:54:12 AM »

Joel Stubbs lookin good

Mars · « **Reply #4 on:** January 18, 2010, 09:27:16 AM »

stubbs has the back that amazes me the most

Hulkster · « **Reply #5 on:** January 18, 2010, 01:50:17 PM »

cue the dorian guy meltdown, as this is the flex list that got number one correct as can be, and dorian in his rightful spot of a distant second

.

Meso_z · « **Reply #6 on:** January 18, 2010, 01:51:43 PM »

Quote from: jupiter23 on January 18, 2010, 08:21:40 AM

why isnt dex in the list? Also stubbs shoulda been number 1 imo

http://www.simplyshredded.com/the-top-20-best-backs-of-all-time.html

omfg....

Dexters back is average at most.

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #7 on:** January 18, 2010, 01:58:02 PM »

Captain Equipoise · « **Reply #8 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:00:31 PM »

That list is seriously f*cked, columbu shouldn't even be top 15...and Stubbs 3 !?!?

top 3 should have been

3. Coleman
2. Yates
1. Stubs

Neptune100 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:34:00 PM »

Jay Cutler #7...are you kidding me? they placed him in front of Victor martinez? thats a no go.

Kai Greene should be up there.

disturbia · « **Reply #10 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:36:26 PM »

best part of this thread will be when Shalaby comes in and somehow justifies Nasser being in that list with his "back"

big L dawg · « **Reply #11 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:39:34 PM »

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #12 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:40:18 PM »

Quote from: disturbia on January 18, 2010, 02:36:26 PM

best part of this thread will be when Shalaby comes in and somehow justifies Nasser being in that list with his "back"

worse than that Goodrum will chime in as he needs to be top 20

Wiggs · « **Reply #13 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:40:48 PM »

Quote from: Neptune100 on January 18, 2010, 02:34:00 PM

Jay Cutler #7...are you kidding me? they placed him in front of Victor martinez? thats a no go.

Kai Greene should be up there.

Correct. At the time they made this Kai wasn't Kai.

Wiggs · « **Reply #14 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:41:47 PM »

Yates, Stubbs and Coleman can go in any order. It just depends on the point of view.

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #15 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:47:30 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on January 18, 2010, 02:40:48 PM

Correct. At the time they made this Kai wasn't Kai.

agreed kai I forgot him after the grapefruit ordeal

Immortal_Technique · « **Reply #16 on:** January 18, 2010, 02:56:35 PM »

Quote from: MORTALCOIL on January 18, 2010, 08:24:45 AM

We had this one before. Columbu is vastly overrated, no signifiant detail, there only for this lat spread. Dorian vs Ronnie is debatable 'til the end of times. Samir should have placed higher than Columbu so should have Robinson. Flex '93 was better than Cutler ever was.

Columbu had the best back of all time for his era. He advanced back development for everyone else to copy. Noone knew a back could look like that until then.