Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!

[The True Adonis]

What's funny about Game Change is that these two guys that wrote it were not even at a lot of the places where they say they witnessed Palin screwing up... Sheeple... Sheeple... Sheeple...

What I think is even funnier and more tragic than misrepresenting the truth is the fact that most of you guys get on GetBig and voice your socialist and close to Communist views, not even thinking that it is Capitalistic backing and ideas that are allowing you to access the internet.

Furthermore, the invention of the internet, (if I can call it that), is purely a Socialist invention (hopefully you will research and verify this) in its inception and has historically remained so with low barrier to entry, even as Internet Service Providers have evolved. 

The internet is the greatest socialist invention in mankind.  The republicans wish to change all of this though with their opposition to net neutrality.

[dr.chimps]

What's funny about Game Change is that these two guys that wrote it were not even at a lot of the places where they say they witnessed Palin screwing up... Sheeple... Sheeple... Sheeple...

What I think is even funnier and more tragic than misrepresenting the truth is the fact that most of you guys get on GetBig and voice your socialist and close to Communist views, not even thinking that it is Capitalistic backing and ideas that are allowing you to access the internet.

Jeez, did you watch the election or have you read the book!? The authors excoriated Hilary Clinton. What is with you Conservatives that lash out in such ignorance? Team Nasser?  

[Mr Nobody]

Jeez, did you watch the election or have you read the book!? The authors excoriated Hilary Clinton. What is with you Conservatives that lash out in such ignorance? Team Nasser?  

Team Nasser hasnt been around today, could they be having a secret meeting to discuss further actions on Getbig?

[The True Adonis]

[Coach is Back!]

Uh, I do, Coach. I saw the election unfold with my skepticism and the all attendant media, and I just now finished the book Game Change by Heilemann and Helperin. You?   

I want to know where it started that Obama was viewed somehow smarter or more intelligent than Palin. Just curious. What has Obama done that deemed him more successful that Palin, before he got elected what has he seriously accomplished other that destroying his little district in Illinois? Has he been a Governor of a state with a proven success record? Just because she isn't a political puppet on capitol hill sure as hell doesn't make her any less intelligent than Obama, actually quite the contrary. And before any of Liberal hacks start cut and pasting bullshit about Palin, don't forget Obama in a year has given us enough material for a life time......more so than Carter!

[Danny]

Jeez, did you watch the election or have you read the book!? The authors excoriated Hilary Clinton. What is with you Conservatives that lash out in such ignorance? Team Nasser?  

Team Ignorance more like it.

[The True Adonis]

I want to know where it started that Obama was viewed somehow smarter or more intelligent than Palin. Just curious. What has Obama done that deemed him more successful that Palin, before he got elected what has he seriously accomplished other that destroying his little district in Illinois? Has he been a Governor of a state with a proven success record? Just because she isn't a political puppet on capitol hill sure as hell doesn't make her any less intelligent than Obama, actually quite the contrary. And before any of Liberal hacks start cut and pasting bullshit about Palin, don't forget Obama in a year has given us enough material for a life time......more so than Carter!

Professor of Constitutional law for 12 years at the University of Chicago Law School.

That alone makes him more intelligent.

[dr.chimps]

I want to know where it started that Obama was viewed somehow smarter or more intelligent than Palin. Just curious. What has Obama done that deemed him more successful that Palin, before he got elected what has he seriously accomplished other that destroying his little district in Illinois? Has he been a Governor of a state with a proven success record? Just because she isn't a political puppet on capitol hill sure as hell doesn't make her any less intelligent than Obama, actually quite the contrary. And before any of Liberal hacks start cut and pasting bullshit about Palin, don't forget Obama in a year has given us enough material for a life time......more so than Carter!

C'mon Coach. This just has to be trolling. *shakes head*    

[Coach is Back!]

C'mon Coach. This just has to be trolling. *shakes head*    

Then answer the question. The problem there is only one reason why the left despises her and thats because she's a serious threat to the democratic party.



READ THIS, I have more.....



From the understandably elated editors at the Communist Party USA’s People’s Weekly World (formerly, the Daily Worker):

    EDITORIAL: Dawn of a new era

    PWW Editorial Board
    People’s Weekly World Newspaper, 11/06/08

    A seismic shift, a watershed moment, an electoral landslide or the dawn of a new era. No matter what the turn of phrase, Nov. 4, 2008, will go down in the history books as the beginning of the end of the 30-year political reign of the ultra-right and its vicious pro-corporate agenda, and the end of a beginning of new politics in the United States of America.

    Convinced by the power of one man’s arguments for hope, unity and change, his program and example, a 52 percent majority of voters rejected the old politics of fear, racism and red-baiting and elected Barack Obama the 44th president of the United States.

    Perhaps it was historically inevitable that this country elected its first African American president. The dynamics of slavery, race and racism, together with the historic role of the African American freedom movement in helping propel the expansion of democracy for all people, have always been a central narrative to the making of America.

    An accident of history, maybe, is the fact that in 2009 the country will celebrate the bicentennial birthday of another tall, lanky, transformative figure from Illinois: Abraham Lincoln.

    In this age of 24-hour news cycles and instant information, when a seismic victory happens it’s important to take a breath and reflect even while celebrating. There will be analysis in the coming weeks in our pages and web site. We’ll be taking closer looks at the many different actors, issues and developments.

    But here is an initial take, a basic framework to ponder and analyze such a momentous moment. This was a victory for the whole U.S. working class. And workers of all job titles, professions, shapes, colors, sizes, hairstyles and languages put their indelible stamp on this victory.

    This is an important point to ponder, not only for people here in the U.S., but also for our sisters and brothers around the world. The U.S. working class is pushing for a new day — in which our country can be a good global citizen and not the “rogue state” the Bush administration has projected.

    The most organized section of the working class — the labor movement — played a stellar role in this election, organizing more than 250,000 labor activists in critical battleground states. But it was its role in challenging and educating union members on racial bias, coupled with a program for economic recovery, that labor proved its invaluable mettle.

    A powerful coalition of forces, inspired towards a new kind of politics, bubbled up from the ground of discontent sown by the authoritarian, reckless and greed-driven policies of the Bush administration. Union members and retirees of all races and the African American people as a whole joined with the emerging political might of Latinos — Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, Cuban Americans and others — and with women and young people en masse to successfully challenge the power of the ultra-right. And the seeds of a renewed and strengthened Jewish-Black unity — historically so key to civil rights progress — are taking root.

    Such unity — as President-elect Obama said — of “young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Latino, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled” is an idea that has been grasped by millions of people and made into a material force shattering the Republicans’ “Southern strategy” and forcing this party of the reactionary right into a meltdown.

    The election outcome represents a clear mandate for pro-people change on taxes, health care, the war in Iraq, job creation and economic relief, union organizing and the Employee Free Choice Act. Reform and relief are in the air. Their scope and depth will be the arena of struggle. The best thing the coalition that won this victory can do is to stick together and help the new administration carry through on its promises. We suspect an Obama administration will have to govern from the center with progressive and left voices included in the dialogue along with conservatives. The ultra-right and corporate interests will do everything in their power to limit, and even steal, the people’s victory.

    Jubilation and celebration, yes, along with realization that the hard work is just beginning.

All of this reminds us of the old joke:

    Q: What is black and white and read (red) all over?

    A: The Daily Worker.

Alas, now that joke could turn out to have yet another punch line — Barack Obama.

Time will tell.

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/communist-party-usa-hail-obama-victory

[dr.chimps]

Professor of Constitutional law for 12 years at the University of Chicago Law School.

That alone makes him more intelligent.

I gotta be honest, TA. I'm more impressed that he was President of the Harvard Law Review. That's an intelligence of the first water.

[slacker]

this ni gg a has done nothing for the country either

[MCWAY]

2 million jobs have been save or created since Obama took office .   You guys are going  to be crying and bitchin so much when the economy is much better and jobs are being created each month! .  What are you going to be able to pick on Obama about then  .  That he's too good of a president and need to slow down to GB standards. .

Hmmmm.....unemployment was around 7 percent when Obama took office. One year later, it's at 10%.

If you create 2 million jobs but 4 million (or more) get LOST, doesn't that put you in the hole?

[MCWAY]

maybe next time the republican party should bring stronger candidates to the table. Fortunately for democrats bush ruined the image of what it is to be republican for years to come, so just sit back and bitch but there's nothing else you can do about it.

I'm sorry!!

Didn't the last three Democrats for whom Obama stumped the last few months LOSE?

Didn't a Repulbican, in the BLUEST STATE (arguably) in the country just snatch beat a Democrat (who once had a 30-point lead) to claim "Ted Kennedy's seat"?

Why is Chris Dodd resigning?

Why is Harry Reid getting clobbered in his home state?

Heck, he's even lost "Obama Girl".

 

[dr.chimps]

Then answer the question. The problem there is only one reason why the left despises her and thats because she's a serious threat to the democratic party.

READ THIS, I have more.....
[Http://sweetness-light.com/archive/communist-party-usa-hail-obama-victory

I gotta be honest, Coach. I'd rather hear your rants than some uncited Conservative boilerplate. No, wait.  

[Topskin69]

I gotta be honest, Coach. I'd rather hear your rants than some uncited Conservative boilerplate. No, wait.  

Chimps... you are continuing to waste your talents on this board. Instead of just throwing bòn móts around, and acting caviler, why don't you actually bother refuting the people that you claim are full of shit.

Or would that simply take up too much time?   Roll Eyes

In the past you have blasted Matt C, and as far as I can remember, (feel free to post corrections if I am wrong), I don't think you have ever tried to write a serious post correcting his ideologies.

Regardless of what one thinks about Cannings opinions, he at least takes the time to offer explanations regarding his rationale, and logic, and is always civil about it, which is far more then most people on this board can say.

As far as Coach is concerned, I don't take him seriously either, but if I took him to task on something, I would post something to justify my reasoning.

You are obviously intelligent and appear to be rather well read, so you are really only doing yourself a disservice, by not actually offering constructive criticism, or explanations as to why you thing someone is spouting off a fallacy, or is in error.

Or perhaps Matt is simply in bad company with another scoundrel in the likes of Voltaire, when he said the following...

"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."

[tbombz]

I gotta be honest, TA. I'm more impressed that he was President of the Harvard Law Review. That's an intelligence of the first water.

i mentioned that earlier. coach seems to think joe schmoe has the capability and drive to become the one of the nations top minds in the field of law.

[dr.chimps]

i mentioned that earlier. coach seems to think joe schmoe has the capability and drive to become the one of the nations top minds in the field of law.

Shit, Dizzle. What do I know. Maybe where Coach comes from it's a dime-a-dozen position. 

[che]

coach seems to think  

I disagree ,
Coach doesn't think, he repeats whatever  Rush,Beck or Hannity say ,and copy  and paste shit  from the Heritage Foundation website.

[tbombz]

I disagree ,
Coach doesn't think, he repeats whatever  Rush,Beck or Hannity say ,and copy  and paste shit  from the Heritage Foundation website.

which is why i always try to use words like "seem".. instead of saying "coach thinks".. its more accurate to say "coach seems to think"..because we have no idea if he really thinks what he says he thinks.. we can only know what seems to be, in this case he seems to think one thing, but we know from a build up of past observations that he probably doesnt come to form his opinions through his own thought process', but more likely he probably just mimmicks the opinion he hears that sounds the best to him.

[Topskin69]

Surely you have a reply Dr.?

[che]

which is why i always try to use words like "seem".. instead of saying "coach thinks".. its more accurate to say "coach seems to think"..because we have no idea if he really thinks what he says he thinks.. we can only know what seems to be, in this case he seems to think one thing, but we know from a build up of past observations that he probably doesnt come to form his opinions through his own thought process', but more likely he probably just mimmicks the opinion he hears that sounds the best to him.

When it comes to politics ,religion or training

                 Coach=brainwashed sheep

[dr.chimps]

Surely you have a reply Dr.?

I'm thinking there may just be some hope for t-bomz, afterall.   

[Topskin69]

I'm thinking there may just be some hope for t-bomz, afterall.   

Lol... no I meant to this post... in quotes.

"Chimps... you are continuing to waste your talents on this board. Instead of just throwing bòn móts around, and acting caviler, why don't you actually bother refuting the people that you claim are full of shit.

Or would that simply take up too much time?   Roll Eyes

In the past you have blasted Matt C, and as far as I can remember, (feel free to post corrections if I am wrong), I don't think you have ever tried to write a serious post correcting his ideologies.

Regardless of what one thinks about Cannings opinions, he at least takes the time to offer explanations regarding his rationale, and logic, and is always civil about it, which is far more then most people on this board can say.

As far as Coach is concerned, I don't take him seriously either, but if I took him to task on something, I would post something to justify my reasoning.

You are obviously intelligent and appear to be rather well read, so you are really only doing yourself a disservice, by not actually offering constructive criticism, or explanations as to why you thing someone is spouting off a fallacy, or is in error.

Or perhaps Matt is simply in bad company with another scoundrel in the likes of Voltaire, when he said the following..."

"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."

[Coach is Back!]

i mentioned that earlier. coach seems to think joe schmoe has the capability and drive to become the one of the nations top minds in the field of law.

Name his political accomplishments before he was elected that wasn't a disaster. He's own district in Illinois was deemed a failure. All of his current policies are failures. If they weren't he wouldn't have to bribe other senators to come to his agenda.

[dr.chimps]

Name his political accomplishments before he was elected that wasn't a disaster. He's own district in Illinois was deemed a failure. All of his current policies are failures. If they weren't he wouldn't have to bribe other senators to come to his agenda.

Easy Coachy.