Author Topic: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban  (Read 1051 times)

Eric15210

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1207
  • poor people are crazy I'm eccentric
U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« on: February 03, 2010, 06:57:25 AM »

The United Nations and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are moving forward with their plan to confiscate your guns.

The United States joined 152 other countries in support of the Arms Trade Treaty Resolution, which establishes the dates for the 2012 UN conference intended to attack American sovereignty by stripping Americans of the right to keep and bear arms.

Working groups of anti-gun countries will begin scripting language for the conference this year, creating a blueprint for other countries when they meet at the full conference.

The stakes couldn’t be higher.

Former United Nation’s ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners about the Arms Trade Treaty and says the UN “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there’s no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

Establishing the dates for the Arms Trade Treaty Conference is just the first step toward their plans for total gun confiscation.

The worldwide gun control mob will ensure the passage of an egregious, anti-gun treaty…

. . .and that’s where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton steps in.

Once the UN Gun Ban is passed by the General Assembly of the United Nations it must be ratified by each nation, including the United States.

As an arch enemy of gun owners, Clinton has pledged to push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. She will push for passage of this outrageous treaty designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

That’s why it’s vital you sign the special petition I’ve made up for your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty.”

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.

But looking at previous versions of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.

Don’t let any of the “experts” lull you to sleep by saying “Oh, we have it handled” or “Until you know exactly what’s in the treaty you can’t fight against it.”

Judging by Ambassador Bolton’s comments — who certainly knows what to expect from the American-freedom-hating international crowd that infests the U.N. — we are certain the treaty’s going to address the private ownership of firearms.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate (which is where we must ultimately make our stand), the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:

*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION. So please click here to sign the petition to your U.S. Senators before it’s too late!

You see, this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Here’s what you can do to help the National Association for Gun Rights fight Hillary Clinton and her United Nations cronies:

• Forward this petition to your friends and relatives who share your concern for American sovereignty and protecting our right to keep and bear arms.

• Please consider making a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights to help us fight Hillary Clinton and the United Nations “Small Arms Treaty.”


http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#more-359
RIP Bob Probert

MRDUMPLING

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Getbig!
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2010, 08:33:39 AM »
This has been going on for a while. 

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2010, 08:57:27 AM »
Please don't make sh*t up.  It's about dealing guns to fu*king despots and stopping countries from doing so.  The UN will NEVER have the power to repeal the 2nd amendment and Obama will NEVER do it either.  Hate him all you want but he is first and foremost a politician and their favorite thing is to stay in power.  He's not going to do anything stupid like repeal or talk of repealing the 2nd amendment. 

I guess though part of it is right.  If you happen to buy your guns from a despot leader or wish to sell to foreign dictators you probably don't like this bill.  For everyday Americans it's business as usual. 
Abandon every hope...

MRDUMPLING

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Getbig!
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2010, 09:31:03 AM »
They don't have the power to do so right now maybe.  It is still imperitive that we don't allow this to happen.  This treaty is not about despots.  It is about disarming citizens.  It calls for the destruction of all semi automatic weapons among other things.  This is a very real threat that we as Americans can't stand for...just saying it won't happen is ignorance at best.  We still have to fight for our rights; which includes all of them. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2010, 09:34:38 AM »
They don't have the power to do so right now maybe.  It is still imperitive that we don't allow this to happen.  This treaty is not about despots.  It is about disarming citizens.  It calls for the destruction of all semi automatic weapons among other things.  This is a very real threat that we as Americans can't stand for...just saying it won't happen is ignorance at best.  We still have to fight for our rights; which includes all of them. 

I just mailed my renewal to the NRA about 15 minutes ago.  They are supposed to send a knife back.   ;D

MRDUMPLING

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Getbig!
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2010, 11:50:30 AM »
Do you have the pen made out of .308 cases?   ;D

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2010, 11:54:58 AM »
Don't allow what to happen? A unilateral agreement to stop illegal arms trade to sh*t can countries? 
Abandon every hope...

MRDUMPLING

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Getbig!
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2010, 11:57:53 AM »
Don't allow what to happen? A unilateral agreement to stop illegal arms trade to sh*t can countries? 

The treaty does more than that.  It restricts our gun rights if you read the article.  Also, illegal by whose standards?  So the U.N. dictates what is illegal trade now?  Hmmm...seems a little shady to me on all levels. 

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2010, 12:02:56 PM »
Says who?  America is a sovereign nation who can choose it's own laws.  If you want the taliban, north korea and the likes to keep having access to guns and military tech and zero punishment for those who sell to them then please go against this bill.

Abandon every hope...

MRDUMPLING

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Getbig!
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2010, 12:18:41 PM »
Says who?  America is a sovereign nation who can choose it's own laws.  If you want the taliban, north korea and the likes to keep having access to guns and military tech and zero punishment for those who sell to them then please go against this bill.



I will.  For one, while the U.S. makes its own laws so do other countries.  While I don't agree with N. Korea and the like getting technologically advanced weaponry they have their own laws and can do as they wish. 

The Taliban do not represent a country(at least not anymore) so you have a point.  Again though, I think the U.N. is still overeaching its bounds by thinking it has the authority over any sovereign nation.  It is hypocritical to say they can have that authority over anyone but us.  The U.N. has no power and should never have that power to do so as it currently seeks to do. 

I will oppose this treaty with everything that I can possibly do. 

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #10 on: February 04, 2010, 06:58:16 PM »
This is the first step to passing the Kyoto accords. I said the same thing two years ago and everyone called me stupid, LOL!

yng466

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #11 on: February 04, 2010, 07:13:40 PM »
As long as the despot,or dictator,is killing an enemy of the United States,the govt. doesn't give one flying fuck if that regime acts responsibly or not!
PARTY LIKE A PIRATE!

MRDUMPLING

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Getbig!
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2010, 08:04:15 AM »
This is the first step to passing the Kyoto accords. I said the same thing two years ago and everyone called me stupid, LOL!

I didn't!  I believed you!   ;D

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2010, 08:29:38 AM »
I didn't!  I believed you!   ;D

You were damn near alone, LOL!

It's this simple, doubters. The Kyoto accords contain a provision that allows UN troops to enforce compliance. Ultimately the far left wants UN troops on US soil and this can't possibly happen with an armed citizenry. This isn't about stopping overarmed whackos who represent a small minority. It's ultimate purpose is removal the citizen's ability to limit government oppression.

On some primal level I sincerely feel people for this are traitors, hate America, and don't believe individuals should have any rights beyond whatever the government dictates.