Author Topic: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'  (Read 1658 times)

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« on: February 09, 2010, 09:52:57 AM »
Peter Schiff is no doubt a smart guy, he has some sound advice and principals but his arrogance in the field is truly unsettling.  People love to talk about Obamas arrogance, and i agree it's unsettling when it's shown, for example the way he must manage everything and have a comment on everything.  Seems a little autocratic to me.  But with Schiff we hear none of this because apparently he is ALWAYS right.  After a little digging i found some information as well as a response by Schiff himself.  Read (without prejudice), discuss and make up your own mind.

http://www.erictyson.com/articles/20090213

During the sharp and volatile stock market slide of 2008-09, Peter Schiff, who heads the brokerage firm, Euro Pacific Capital based in Darien, CT with five branch offices in California, Florida and Arizona, has frequently been on television, especially the cable channels including CNBC. His book, Crash Proof: How to Profit From the Coming Economic Collapse (Wiley) is a national best-seller.  Along with a growing chorus of others such as Nouriel Roubini, Barry Ritholtz, and Gary Shilling, Schiff is one of those guys now saying "I told you so" in reference to the recent economic and financial market problems.

Schiff's quote used for the headline of this article ("The reality is I don't think I've been wrong on anything") comes from an interview U.S. News & World Reports magazine did with Schiff in their May 30, 2008 issue. (In that piece, Schiff made a number of predictions I will get to in a moment.) The quote came from comments he made when discussing the supposed accuracy of his predictions over the past decade.

Peter Schiff began his career in the financial services world as a stockbroker, doing what I thought I wanted to do when I grew up. (I lost interest in the job once I learned about selling and working on commission). My dad used to take me to visit his broker at Merrill Lynch. Mind you, my dad was no high roller but he had begun handling some investments when he was laid off from his job as a mechanical engineer during the severe recession of 1973-74.

In watching and reading his interviews and in speaking with Schiff myself on February 12th, 2009, I am struck by the forcefulness and certainty of his views and predictions. He doesn't hedge and as he did in the U.S News interview, he told me, "Pretty much everything is happening as I scripted it to happen with minor exceptions..."

When I asked Schiff what training and experiences he had to form his economic views and opinions, I asked if he was an economist or had any economics training. "I think I know more about economics than anyone with the title and I know more than anyone in government," he boasted, adding, "These other guys are witch doctors and I'm the real doctor."

As for when he developed his economic genius, Schiff told me, "I've always known this much -ever since I was a kid and my dad wrote a book called the Biggest Con: How the Government is Fleecing You, I understood capitalism and how it works. I read Ayn Rand and I read some of the Keynesian economics stuff and could see why those economists were all wrong."

Schiff's father, Irwin Schiff, is a long-term tax protestor who has written many books about the supposed illegality of the U.S. income tax system. Unfortunately the senior Irwin didn't read the section in my Taxes for Dummies about what happens to folks who refuse to pay their income taxes because they don't believe in the validity of our nation's tax laws. Sadly, Irwin Schiff, now in his 80s, has been convicted of numerous federal income tax crimes and is currently serving another lengthy prison term.

Interestingly, in the marketing copy for Irwin Schiff's book, The Biggest Con, it says of the book, "It will convince you that most American ‘economists' don't know what they are talking about - which is why this country is in such deep economic and financial trouble. It provides irrefutable proof of how the federal government has been continually undermining the American economy and forcing a lower standard of living on us all." This sounds a lot like the recent statements of his son Peter yet the father's book was published back in 1977! (You know the expression about the apple not falling far from the tree...) Before I get to Peter Schiff's more recent predictions, I was able to track down some of his older ones. I always enjoy doing this for prognosticators like Schiff who claim as he did to U.S. News last year that, "The reality is I don't think I've been wrong on anything," in reference to his predictions over the past decade. Let's take a look at that bold claim.

Thanks to the wonders of video technology, we have an accurate record of Schiff's views from this 2002 television interview. What is notable here is that in this 2002 interview, Schiff was saying nearly the same exact things that he did during 2008 and in his recent interview with me.





At the time of this 2002 interview, the U.S. stock market had already suffered steep losses and the economy was in recession at the time of this 2002 interview. The highlights of Schiff's predictions: he saw substantial downside over the next couple of years for the stock market. He predicted that the Dow, which was around 10,000 at the time, would plummet to between 2,000 and 4,000 and he even went so far as to say that the Dow might fall below 2,000. He expected the NASDAQ to drop to 500 from its then level of 1,700. He also said that the dollar was going to fall sharply and interest rates were going to go through the roof accompanied by dramatic inflation.

On all of these counts, Schiff wasn't just wrong but ended up being hugely wrong.

Now, fast forward to May 30, 2008 and the U.S. News article, "Permabear Peter Schiff's Worst-Case Scenario." Let's review some of the key predictions he made in that piece As for his investing predictions he said, "I'm getting my clients' money outside of the United States as fast as they can send it to me...You've got to own resources and energy...I've been buying gold, silver, industrial metals, and all kinds of stocks. My main theme is the global economy will survive and the U.S. economy is a disaster. Everything is about how you benefit from the increased purchasing power and rising standard of living in the rest of the world."

This was wrong as commodity prices have plunged since this interview (see graph below). Foreign stocks actually declined more in 2008 than did U.S. stocks so Schiff was wrong on that count too.

When asked, "Why don't you think soaring oil, grains, or commodities prices are the next bubble?" Schiff replied:

"These prices do not constitute bubbles. They simply constitute the repricing of goods to reflect the diminished value of our money. The way you can tell there's not a bubble is that these markets are clearing. People are buying food and eating it. They're buying gasoline and using it. Speculators aren't buying gasoline and warehousing it in big facilities because they think the price is going to go up." Schiff went on to say,

"Gold is going to be $1,200 to $1,500 by the end of the year."

"Oil prices had a pretty big run and might not make more headway by the end of the year. But we could see $150 to $200 next year."

"At a minimum, the dollar will lose another 40 to 50 percent of its value."


iShares S&P Commodity Price Index





Well, Schiff was wrong on these 2008 predictions on gold, and wrong on oil, which plunged with the commodity bubble bursting. When asked, "So how bad do you think this economy will get?" Schiff said, "We're going through a very rough period in our history. In many ways, it's going to be worse than the Depression." That's what prompted my call to Schiff to explain this stunning statement.

"During the depression, the U.S. economy was actually still fundamentally sound. The U.S. government created the great depression...Japan's government made the same mistakes in the 1990s and made the downturn worse and longer lasting," he said. He went on to explain, "We allowed our economy to move from producing goods to a service economy. Our economy now is completely phony."

In his 2002 television interview I discussed earlier, Schiff similarly argued that the U.S. economy would crater because of the decline of our manufacturing base. Perhaps if Schiff had studied some basic economics, he would have learned that economies change and that's not a bad thing. If Schiff had lived 100 years ago, he would have been screaming over the decline of our farming industry. And, as I recently discussed in my review of Jeremy Siegel's classic book, Stocks for the Long Run, the changing composition of our industry base is not in and of itself concerning in our global economy. We actually have a highly diverse economy.

In my recent interview of Schiff, sounding a lot like he did back in 2002, he said, "The government is trying to fix the economy through intervention and will make the situation worse. We can't afford all of this government. The dollar is still rising and the world is still giving us more rope to hang ourselves. The dollar will plunge and that will cause rapid inflation and high interest rates." As for being wrong on commodity prices last year, Schiff maintains that prices will make new highs and the only reason that hasn't happened yet is because the dollar hasn't yet collapsed.

Why hasn't this yet happened and why did commodity prices collapse in late 2008 while investors worldwide bought U.S. Treasury bonds and bills? "I overestimated the intelligence of the world to see the coming inflation," Schiff told me.

In summary, Schiff reminds me very much of Douglas Casey who wrote the 1980 best-seller Crisis Investing: Opportunities and Profits in the Coming Great Depression. Casey predicted soaring inflation and commodity prices and a plunging U.S. dollar. Schiff has been singing this same song for many years. The vast majority of Schiff's market and economic calls have been significantly off.

He appears to have built himself a profitable brokerage business by harping on the simple message that the U.S. is going down the tubes and you've got to get your money overseas and into commodities. However, his clients' performance (apparently following his risky and flawed predictions) has been sub-par as has been documented in numerous sources, most recently in this Wall Street Journal article.

As I've long argued, stock market investors should hold plenty of overseas stocks for diversification purposes and to benefit from foreign economies growing faster than the U.S. economy. However, buying individual stocks as Schiff advocates is costly (although profitable for his brokerage firm). Commodity investments is a high risk, dangerous game for novice investors and the only long-term winner there is usually the broker getting a piece of the trades and investments. Over the very long-term, commodity prices and gold have barely kept investors up with the rate of inflation. Over brief periods of unexpectedly higher inflation, such investments tend to do well but timing such moves is quite difficult to do.

Update on 2/23/09: I just got off the phone from doing a radio interview with Jason Hartman for his real estate and financial show. Early on, he asked me about various gurus and Peter Schiff's name quickly came up. Schiff he said had been a guest on his program in the past. Without missing a beat, Mr. Hartman proceeded to tell me how he invested $200,000 through Schiff's firm and now had just half of that left!




Copyright Eric Tyson, 2008 - 2010 all rights reserved.

Eric Tyson is the only best-selling personal finance author who has an extensive background as an hourly-based financial advisor and who does not accept speaking fees, endorsement deals or fees of any type from companies in the financial services industry or product or service providers recommended in his articles, books and his publications.

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/01/peter-schiff-was-wrong.html

There are numerous YouTube videos, articles, and references to Peter Schiff being "right" rapidly circulating the globe. While Schiff was indeed correct about the US imploding, most of the praise heaped on Schiff is simply unwarranted, and I can prove it.

First, let's start with a look at the claim being made. Peter Schiff concludes many of his articles, books, etc. with the following statement.

    Mr. Schiff is one of the few non-biased investment advisors (not committed solely to the short side of the market) to have correctly called the current bear market before it began and to have positioned his clients accordingly.

Highlight in red is mine.

I would like to see some proof of that statement. Specifically I would like to see the average returns posted by EuroPacific clients for 2008.

I have talked with many who claim they have invested with Schiff and are down anywhere from 40% to 70% in 2008. There are many other such claims on the internet. They are entirely believable for the simple reason Schiff's investment thesis was flat out wrong.

I have an actual portfolio statement from one of Schiff's clients at the end to discuss, for now let's discuss the main points of Schiff's thesis.

Schiff's Overall Thesis

    * US Equity Markets Will Crash.
    * US Dollar Will Go To Zero (Hyperinflation).
    * Decoupling (The rest of the world would be immune to a US slowdown.
    * Buy foreign equities and commodities and hold them with no exit strategy.


Schiff was correct about point number 1 above. The US equity markets crashed. That was a very good call. Unfortunately, his investment thesis centered on shorting the dollar in a hyperinflation bet, and buying foreign equities rather than shorting US equities.

Furthermore, Schiff made no allowances for being wrong and had no exit strategy whatsoever.

What happened in 2008 was that foreign equities sold off much harder than US equities, and a strengthening US dollar compounded the situation.

In other words, Schiff failed where it matters most: Peter Schiff did not protect his client's assets. Let's take a look how, and more importantly why, starting with charts of various foreign indices.

$SSEC Shanghai Stock Exchange Weekly



$NIKK Tokyo Nikkei Weekly Chart



$TSX - Canada TSX Weekly Chart



$AORD Australia ASX Weekly Chart



$SPX S&P 500 Weekly



12 Ways Schiff Was Wrong in 2008

    * Wrong about hyperinflation
    * Wrong about the dollar
    * Wrong about commodities except for gold
    * Wrong about foreign currencies except for the Yen
    * Wrong about foreign equities
    * Wrong in timing
    * Wrong in risk management
    * Wrong in buy and hold thesis
    * Wrong on decoupling
    * Wrong on China
    * Wrong on US treasuries
    * Wrong on interest rates, both foreign and domestic


That's a lot of things to be wrong about, especially given all the "Peter Schiff Was Right" videos floating around everywhere. The one thing he was right about was the collapse of US equities and no part of his investment strategy sought to make a gain from that prediction.

Peter Schiff concludes many of his articles, books, etc. with the claim he saw this coming and "positioned his clients accordingly".

'Dr. Doom' became a star by predicting last year's market meltdown. And now his 2009 forecast is even scarier.

Schiff did not invest for doom; he invested for a bull market that did not exist. He was wrong where it mattered most, protecting client assets. For this amazing feat, people think of him as a star.

An Actual Schiff Portfolio




Abandon every hope...

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2010, 10:01:06 AM »
Schiff is right... eventually.

Moves by Bush and Obama have pushed back a collapse for 1, 10, or 100 years.  We dunno.  Sure, we'll never pay off the debt and it'll collapse one day.  But as long as it's a hundred years from now, why worry about it?

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2010, 10:02:45 AM »

The Ticker
Peter Schiff Responds

    * Share
    * Comment
    * Print

By Kirk Shinkle

Posted: January 30, 2009

Permabear pundit Peter Schiff has had a rough week (see: Peter Schiff: Right On The Crisis, Wrong On Investing?). Today he responds to blogger Mike Shedlock and this WSJ story questioning the performance of his client's investments through his firm, Euro Pacific Capital.

In a long post on Seeking Alpha (Peter Schiff Answers His Critics), he backs his bearish forecasts and his investment strategy, concluding with this:

    My critics have often referred to me as a stopped clock. I believe that the accusation is best leveled at the accusers. Having been wrong for so long, they are now enjoying their brief moment in the sun. They should enjoy it while it lasts. For now, they are creating fodder for some future "Peter Schiff was Right" piece where those who now criticize my investment performance will look just as foolish as those who once criticized my economic forecasts.

The full text of his response is after the jump.

    My popularity on television and the internet has led a very small money manager to use his popular financial blog to promote his fledgling business by attacking the recent poor performance of my long-term investment strategy. The post is causing quite a stir and compels me to provide some badly needed context.

    To achieve his ends, this individual has distorted much of what I have been saying and writing, and has twisted the facts to support his own preconceived conclusion. In essence, his piece is nothing more than an overt advertisement (and a highly deceptive one at that) to use my popularity to advance his career. In so doing he has given my critics, particularly some who have been embarrassed by their roles in the "Peter Schiff was Right" video, their moments of retribution. In addition, some members of the press who have never been among my greatest fans are seizing the opportunity to discredit me as well.

    The crux of the blogger's arguments are that my beliefs in "decoupling, hyperinflation, and that the dollar is going to zero" have been completely discredited by the events of 2008, and that the resulting investment losses suffered by my clients last year confirms the fatal flaws in my approach.

    In addition to mischaracterizing many of my beliefs, he also is confusing short-term market fluctuations with long-term economic trends.

    First of all, the hyper inflation issue is a straw man at best. While I often talk about the possibility of hyper inflation, I have always said that it would be a worse-case scenario that would play out over many years. The fact that it did not appear in the first year of the economic crash (2008) does not invalidate my position. I have always maintained that this worst-case scenario will likely be avoided by what will ultimately be a dramatic shift in policy once our leaders come to their senses. However, until then the dollar will likely lose a substantial portion of its value.

    Second, I never said that the dollar would go to zero, either in 2008 or any year thereafter. I have said that in the event of hyper inflation the dollar's value would approach zero. My actual forecast in my book "Crash Proof" was that the Dollar Index would fall to 40 (currently about 85), with a realistic worst case scenario, assuming very high but not hyper inflation, of 20 or lower.

    Third, the blogger points out that because the decoupling theory (foreign economies improving while the U.S. falters) that I wrote about in "Crash Proof" has yet to occur, that the theory itself was ridiculous. In my book I wrote that this process would not occur overnight, that initially our creditors would come to our aid, and in so doing our problems would become manifest abroad. I wrote that it would take time for the world to realize that what had been decoupled from the economic train was not the engine but the caboose. In fact, that is precisely the way it is playing out.

    Chapter Ten of "Crash Proof" is specifically focused on the need to keep funds liquid to take advantage of the buying opportunity that would initially develop once our stock market began its collapse. I specifically mentioned that when U.S. stocks began to fall, we could expect sympathetic declines overseas. While I did not know the precise timing of those events, I advised readers to prepare.

    I did not expect the huge dollar rally of 2008. But to discredit my long-term view of the dollar based on an eight month move is absurd. So while I believed that a weak dollar would cushion the temporary decline I expected in foreign stocks, a strong dollar ended up exacerbating it. In the meantime, I believed that the high dividends these stocks were paying would make it easier to ride out any correction. The problem was that the dollar fell so far leading up to the crisis (in 2005-2007) that by the time the crisis finally erupted the dollar was poised for a bounce.

    Central to the argument that my investment thesis is wrong is the belief that the crisis is over or that the recent trends will continue until it is. But the crisis is just beginning and the movements thus far in the dollar, commodities, and foreign stocks, are mere head fakes. Once the speculators have been flushed from the markets, the underlying long-term trends I have been following should return in earnest.

    To illustrate the flaws in my investment strategy the blogger has posted a client's statement that shows a loss in excess of 60%. In addition, he claims to know of other Euro Pacific clients who have experienced similar losses. The inference of course is that most, or all, of my clients must have suffered similar losses, and the existence of such losses proves that I am wrong. In fact, some have gone a step further, claiming that such losses prove that I am a fraud.

    First let's deal with the one client's account. I have been following several key investment themes for the past ten years. The basis for my strategy is that recent U.S. prosperity has been false, and that the consequences of the bursting of our bubble economy would ultimately play out in a substantial decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, higher commodity prices, the re-monetization of gold, and foreign equities substantially outperforming U.S. markets. From an investment perspective, those themes played out extremely well in the eight years from 2000-2007. Recently we have seen a sharp, and I believe temporary, reversal of these trends. Those that came late to the party (at least based on where we are today) now have to ride out a particularly difficult correction.

    For example, the account in question belongs to the son of a long-standing Euro Pacific client, who is still adding funds to his accounts. Without specially commenting on the performance of the father's account, it must have been compelling enough to finally persuade the son to come on board himself in early 2008. However, as is often the case, by the time he came on board, foreign stocks and commodities were about to sell off, and the dollar was about to begin its unexpected rally. Following such a sharp correction, the son now regrets his decision and must blame me for my part in helping him make it.

    Perhaps as a stockbroker I should have persuaded the son to wait for a correction. However, while this clearly would have been the right call with the full benefit of hind-sight, it was certainly not as clear given the information I had at the time. However, I never held myself out to be a market timer. My advice was always geared to long-term investors. Given the thousands of clients that I have, and the large number who joined near the recent dollar peak and market tops, it's no wonder that a few have contacted this blogger to complain; especially since he has actively sought them out. Of course, the fact that the overwhelming majority of my clients are not complaining, to him or anyone else for that matter, says a lot more about what is really going on.

    To the extent that the long-term trends I have been following continue, I am confident that even those whose short-term timing was bad will still do well in time. This is especially true if they take advantage of this pull back by adding to their accounts, either with new funds or by re-investing their dividends. However, to examine the effectiveness of my investment strategy immediately following a major correction by looking only at those accounts who adopted the strategy at the previous peak is unfair and distortive.

    Since I have been advising investors to follow these trends for ten years, I will leave it to the public to draw their own conclusions as to how long-term followers of my strategy have fared. However, for those who only recently adopted my approach in 2007 or 2008, the road has been a lot bumpier than they or I thought it would be when they climbed on board. Yet if these long-term trends re-emerge, though the journey may be different than planned, the ultimate destination will remain the same.

    The blogger in question implies that all of my clients are down by levels similar to the account he cites. He has asked me to refute his allegations by providing broader performance figures for more clients. But, since Euro Pacific Capital is a brokerage firm and not a Registered Investment Advisor, I am prohibited by regulators from providing any details on the investment performance achieved by my clients. The blogger in question makes his challenge knowing full well that I am legally prevented from accepting it. He then uses my failure to refute his false claim as validating its accuracy.

    In addition, consider that 70% of the account in question happens to be invested in mining and energy stocks. These were the two sectors that got hit the hardest in the recent downturn. This is a very aggressive exposure to those sectors and not typical of Euro Pacific clients. While it is true that many of my clients are interested in these two sectors and specifically seek portfolios heavily weighted in these areas, most take a more balanced approach, with mining and energy typically representing 20% to 30% of their portfolios. I also have clients with minimal or no exposure to these sectors.

    All Euro Pacific client accounts are different reflecting the individual objectives of each client. In general the goals of my clients are to get out of the dollar and hedge against inflation. However the way each client chooses to pursue these goals varies. Some choose a relatively conservative approach, consisting mainly of utilities, property trusts and bonds, others choice a more balanced approach, adding exposure to infrastructure, agriculture, energy trusts, and transportation, while some are more aggressive with heavy exposure to resources, junior mining companies, and oil and gas exploration companies. Some clients specifically seek to gain or avoid exposure to certain regions, sectors or currencies. Some are focused more on long-term preservation of purchasing power, while others look to maximize long-term appreciation. Most of our accounts are yield oriented, but many of our clients specially request more aggressive growth oriented portfolios. In a down market to evaluate my investment strategy based solely on the performance of the most aggressive accounts is completely unfair. Doing so ignores the better performance of less aggressive accounts that were not hit nearly as hard.

    In addition, to look only at the performance of foreign stocks, while ignoring other aspects of my investment strategy only tells part of the story. What about gold, foreign bonds, short positions in financials, home builders and subprime mortgages (or merely avoiding long exposure to those sectors), or other investments people have made, either at Euro Pacific or elsewhere based on my insights? What about dividends earned, or gains realized on closed positions?

    Mainstream economists, journalists, and investment professionals have never liked my message and have never resisted the temptation to shoot the messenger. When my investment strategies were performing well, I got little credit for it. Instead, all the attention was focused on the apparent failure of my dire economic predictions to materialize. Now that the economy is collapsing along the lines that I correctly forecast, criticism is being focused on the recent poor performance of my investment strategy (a fact that I have never tried to hide). Of course by the time my investment strategy is once again in step with my economic forecasts, an event that I believe will occur sooner than most people think, it will likely be too late for most people to do adopt it.

    My critics have often referred to me as a stopped clock. I believe that the accusation is best leveled at the accusers. Having been wrong for so long, they are now enjoying their brief moment in the sun. They should enjoy it while it lasts. For now, they are creating fodder for some future "Peter Schiff was Right" piece where those who now criticize my investment performance will look just as foolish as those who once criticized my economic forecasts.



Schiffs response
Abandon every hope...

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2010, 10:07:55 AM »
Schiff is right... eventually.

Moves by Bush and Obama have pushed back a collapse for 1, 10, or 100 years.  We dunno.  Sure, we'll never pay off the debt and it'll collapse one day.  But as long as it's a hundred years from now, why worry about it?

Well that is certainly one way to look at it.  My issue is not that he is correct/incorrect, many economists and financial advisers saw this coming just most aren't as full of self to proclaim they are some sort of stock messiah who is never wrong.   It's that type of arrogance, that adherance that my word is law that makes you question two things -
a) can this guy learn anything anymore or is he only going to surround himself with yes types who feed his self absorption
and
b) if he saw all this coming how come some of his clients faced massive losses?  Shouldn't he have been ahead of the pack on this? 
Abandon every hope...

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2010, 10:24:50 AM »
333 is going to be on suicide watch when he reads this.  :-X

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2010, 11:53:18 AM »
 ;D
Abandon every hope...

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2010, 12:37:06 PM »
bump for 333 response  :D
Abandon every hope...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2010, 12:39:59 PM »
bump for 333 response  :D

I have been over this at least 5 times as has Bindare.   Look it up.

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2010, 01:04:39 PM »
I have been over this at least 5 times as has Bindare.   Look it up.

No response is your response huh?  Wow.  333's messiah failed his own clients after predicting what would come, wow.  Then he says i've never been wrong'  arrogance at it's greatest.  You say Obama's arrogance is an issue how come schiffs isn't too?
Abandon every hope...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2010, 01:12:19 PM »
No response is your response huh?  Wow.  333's messiah failed his own clients after predicting what would come, wow.  Then he says i've never been wrong'  arrogance at it's greatest.  You say Obama's arrogance is an issue how come schiffs isn't too?

Do you even read?  We have been over this 5 times already.  Look it up.   

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2010, 01:14:42 PM »
Do you even read?  We have been over this 5 times already.  Look it up.   

So you have no defense for his arrogance i take it? 
Abandon every hope...

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2010, 01:22:32 PM »
Bindare's stellar reasoning was that it was reported in the beginning of 2009 and was a year ago.  ::)

Schiff = not getting my vote. Hope he enjoys playing fifth runner up for the senate here.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2010, 01:24:15 PM »
Bindare's stellar reasoning was that it was reported in the beginning of 2009 and was a year ago.  ::)

Schiff = not getting my vote. Hope he enjoys playing fifth runner up for the senate here.


Have fun with Blumenthal & Lieberman. 

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2010, 01:26:06 PM »

Have fun with Blumenthal & Lieberman. 

They both blow too. Schiff = not an upgrade, though.

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2010, 01:27:14 PM »

Have fun with Blumenthal & Lieberman. 

how heart broken will you be when he loses 333?  do you think you'll cry just a little bit?

We should start a getbig poll - after schiff is eliminated what will 333 do?
a) get more guns
b) post frantically on getbig about the injustice
c) cry hysterically into his cereal
d) all of the above

I'm going with d  ;D
Abandon every hope...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2010, 01:28:19 PM »
how heart broken will you be when he loses 333?  do you think you'll cry just a little bit?

We should start a getbig poll - after schiff is eliminated what will 333 do?
a) get more guns
b) post frantically on getbig about the injustice
c) cry hysterically into his cereal
d) all of the above

I'm going with d  ;D

I would be happy with Linda McMahon too.  She is extremely smart, a business person, and has private sector experience. 

Blumenthal is a typical hack politician. 

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2010, 02:32:21 PM »
so nothing about the shear arrogance of schiff 333?  The fact he lost clients large sums of money even though he claims he predicted this would all happen? and that he is never wrong? 

\
Abandon every hope...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2010, 02:37:03 PM »
so nothing about the shear arrogance of schiff 333?  The fact he lost clients large sums of money even though he claims he predicted this would all happen? and that he is never wrong? 

\

KC - since you have never run a business, let me share something with you.  If you do a shit job for your clients, they leave and dont come back. 

So far as I can tell, while schiff may have lost a few people some money, he still is growing his businesses, which means to me his existing clients are happy and he is attracting new clients. 

If he goes out of business for failing so many clients, than the proof speaks for itself.  Bindare and I already addressed this. 


kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2010, 02:46:51 PM »
KC - since you have never run a business, let me share something with you.  If you do a shit job for your clients, they leave and dont come back. 

So far as I can tell, while schiff may have lost a few people some money, he still is growing his businesses, which means to me his existing clients are happy and he is attracting new clients. 

If he goes out of business for failing so many clients, than the proof speaks for itself.  Bindare and I already addressed this. 



So his arrogance is warranted?  In your opinion he has a right to proclaim he is never wrong even when he is wrong?  Wow how badly do you want to suck his d*ck 333? Oh wait don't ask don't tell right?  ;D
Abandon every hope...

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #19 on: February 09, 2010, 06:32:31 PM »
I sent various posters here private emails to Schiffs stock picks for 09 where the stocks he chose performed very well. One of his picks was up over 1100%. No responses.

Does he come off as being pompous sometime? Yes. Can he be annoying? Yes. Is he wrong sometimes? The honest answer is yes. No one is perfect, (except for getbig posters)   :D

Looking back everyone knew the crisis was coming...even the guys that said everything was ok. I remember there was at least 10 posts started about the coming crash everyday on getbig. Thanks for warning us all you Nostradamus'  ::) loco even says there was no crash. Whatever, Peter had more right than most of his critics and there is plenty of time for some of the things he said would happen to still happen. Despite his faults, I'd rather listen to his views on the economy more than a Barney Frank, (who incidentally gets praise from some of the getbig big brains.)

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Peter Schiff 'i don't think i've been wrong on anything'
« Reply #20 on: February 10, 2010, 08:55:17 AM »
So you agree his arrogance is of issue?  If 333 had read what i said in the first paragraph he would see i don't think Schiff is a bad portfolio manager at all.  I just think his arrogance and statements of how correct he always is have been shown to be lies. 

Abandon every hope...