« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better  (Read 2620 times)

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« on: February 14, 2010, 07:11:36 PM »
Thanks to IFBB judges for ruining bodybuilding.
Logged

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2010, 07:13:23 PM »
 :)
Logged

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2010, 07:14:41 PM »
 :)
Logged

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2010, 07:31:28 PM »
People like seeing freaks. I didn't get into bodybuilding to be some pussy symmetrical  twink
Logged

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2010, 07:36:13 PM »
Logged
A

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29909
  • Expunged
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2010, 09:02:24 PM »
Did Kamali tear both biceps or something?
Logged

Beener

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2010, 12:25:41 AM »
Quote from: TRIX on February 14, 2010, 07:31:28 PM
People like seeing freaks. I didn't get into bodybuilding to be some pussy symmetrical  twink


QTF
Logged

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2010, 12:51:39 AM »
damn kamalis arms actually looked pretty good there. see what an illusion bbing is.
Logged

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2010, 12:53:18 AM »
Yes I noticed that when someone just turns pro, they look better than they do after being a seasoned pro.  I'm all for mass, but at what cost? 
Logged

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 51920
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2010, 01:30:06 AM »
King was good back then, before he swelled up.
Logged
Q

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2010, 03:01:04 AM »
Quote from: TRIX on February 14, 2010, 07:31:28 PM
People like seeing freaks. I didn't get into bodybuilding to be some pussy symmetrical  twink

seems that youre quite the "freak" yourself. ::) ::) ::)
Logged

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2010, 03:26:38 AM »
Bigger isn`t better,better is better!!

Most guys look like crap when they turn pro after putting on 30-50 more disproportionate pounds,which would be impossible to do normally  without upping the dosages to epic proportions,staying on indefinately,using Gh and insulin,eatinf tons of food, and training like sloths.
Logged

G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2010, 03:33:04 AM »
in the offseason someone advised king to play the 300lb offseason game and that was the end of him.  he never had the genetics to pull it off.   even jay stays sub-300.  ronnie n guys over 72".  no way a guy under 69" should be 300lbs.  forget that i'm growning nonsense...just an excuse to get fat.
Logged

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2010, 04:24:57 AM »
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
X2
Logged

jon cole

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2454
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2010, 04:27:24 AM »
nasser can add 30 pounds without losing definition.
jay clearly ruined his shape.
Logged
asstropin

saopl

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 768
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2010, 05:23:55 AM »
third picture down looks like Tom Hanks.
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2010, 05:28:15 AM »
Kevin,Nasser,Coleman all looked better bigger
Logged

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2010, 05:43:49 AM »
I think there is something very wrong with Levrone's most muscular, it looks really messy and unbalanced.
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2010, 06:24:36 AM »
Quote from: #1 Klaus fan on February 15, 2010, 05:43:49 AM
I think there is something very wrong with Levrone's most muscular, it looks really messy and unbalanced.

maby the complete lack of deffenition in his synthol arms..
Logged

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #19 on: February 15, 2010, 06:44:51 AM »
That's the same dude?? ??? Wow, roids make you handsome....

Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #20 on: February 15, 2010, 06:49:50 AM »
Quote from: affeman on February 15, 2010, 06:44:51 AM
That's the same dude?? ??? Wow, roids make you handsome....



looks fine to me?

Logged

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2010, 08:50:44 AM »
Quote from: Swede! on February 15, 2010, 06:49:50 AM
looks fine to me?



Branch is a actually a good looking dude, its just the contest dehydration which makes him look "ugly".
Logged

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: In bodybuilding bigger is not necessarily better
« Reply #22 on: February 15, 2010, 09:28:51 AM »
Logged
A
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »