HULKSTER, EAT THIS!!!

[Hulkster]

LOL That was a self-owning, he looks way sharper and grainier in the 98 pic. Look at the quads, zero vascularity in 99.

yeah, look at the quads in 99.. LOL

 

[affeman]

yeah, look at the quads in 99.. LOL

 

Like I said, ZERO vascularity compared to 98.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Like I said, ZERO vascularity compared to 98.

Hahahahahahahah awesome ! the kid is to stupid to comprehend bigger doesn't equate to better 

[affeman]

Hahahahahahahah awesome ! the kid is to stupid to comprehend bigger doesn't equate to better 

I mean, these screencaps are a fuckin' joke, even Jack Black would have abs on these.



The pics from the site before illustrate pretty clearly imo that his conditionining in 98 was superiour to 99.

[Hulkster]

Hahahahahahahah awesome ! the kid is to stupid to comprehend bigger doesn't equate to better  

zero vascularity?

what the fuck are you two idiots talking about?

 

ronnie 98 was NEVER this big or grainy and cut:

15 pounds bigger with a bit better conditioning, just like ronnie said.

note the vascularity everywhere as well. losers.

[Hulkster]

ronnie's conditioning in 99 was noticably better than 98, especially in the quads, glutes and hams...

the proof is EVERYWHERE you look, yet the nuthuggers are in some sort of complete denial:

 

why they care so much, who the fuck knows..

[NarcissisticDeity]

zero vascularity?

what the fuck are you two idiots talking about?

 

ronnie 98 was NEVER this big or grainy and cut:

15 pounds bigger with a bit better conditioning, just like ronnie said.

note the vascularity everywhere as well. losers.

hahahahahaha he was 249 pounds in 1998 and 257 pounds in 1999 . 15 pounds would make him 264 pounds which he wasn't and his delts , his back and his abs aren't nearly as hard or as dry pics and videos confirm this and so does Ronnie when he said specifically 1998 was his best because his conditioning was better

[NarcissisticDeity]

ronnie's conditioning in 99 was noticably better than 98, especially in the quads, glutes and hams...

the proof is EVERYWHERE you look, yet the nuthuggers are in some sort of complete denial:

 

why they care so much, who the fuck knows..

yeah it was noticeably better yet NOT one single expert agrees LMFAO he's just as conditioned as 1998/2001 15 pounds heavier LMFAO yet NOT one expert agree it's his best epic denial

[Hulkster]

yeah it was noticeably better yet NOT one single expert agrees

ronnie coleman agrees:

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html

I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year.

 


you are so screwed. trapped in your own quotes game LOL

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

ronnie coleman agrees:

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html


 


you are so screwed. trapped in your own quotes game LOL

 

Yeah Ronnie agrees 1998 was better in FACT he's remained pretty consistent with that FACT just like the FACT he believe he couldn't beat Dorian  

don't forget Weider , Perine , McGough , Heath and Alves and Shawn Ray has said 98 was Ronnie's best too 

you're screwed with FACTS quotes , pics , videos all you have left is tears  

[Hulkster]

consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?

LOL

add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..

99>>98

[NarcissisticDeity]

consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?

LOL

add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..

99>>98

Consistent after the fact , and consistent with scores of other experts , you on the other hand have NOTHING as usual

1998 was better because he was harder and drier pics , videos and experts agree what's left? denial by dumb Hulkster

[NarcissisticDeity]

Hey Neo when you posted this quote from Ray you omitted a part you sneaky little weasel I wonder why 

owned again dumbass

1st - Ronnie Coleman
"Ridiculous" Ronnie Coleman would win his 6th Sandow Trophy in a row looking absolutely ridiculous!

This guy was from another planet! Ronnie added about a million pounds of muscle from the previous year and squashed the competition on sheer MASS! Unbelievable is what Ronnie was this night! Personally, I like the smaller version of 2001 when he won the ASC however, my hat goes off to a guy who packs on 40 more pounds of muscle in a year!

So add more to the growing list of people who all say 1998 and 2001 shit on 1999/2003 

[Mr.1derful]

98>99

Hope this helps.

[NarcissisticDeity]

98>99

Hope this helps.

don't forget 03 too 

[Shockwave]

consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?

LOL

add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..

99>>98

Fucking LOL.
Constantly denying the fact he said 99 was better RIGHT AFTER THE CONTEST, vs saying 98 is better 3 times down the road kinda says one thing.. He believes 98 is better you fucking delusional clown! Lol!! Cause ya know, someone is gonna say, "hey I was better last year" right after the contest you fucking gimp.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Fucking LOL.
Constantly denying the fact he said 99 was better RIGHT AFTER THE CONTEST, vs saying 98 is better 3 times down the road kinda says one thing.. He believes 98 is better you fucking delusional clown! Lol!! Cause ya know, someone is gonna say, "hey I was better last year" right after the contest you fucking gimp.

He thinks if he continues to stick to his story he wont look as stupid and it only makes him look like more of a fucking moron. But he doesn't care about looking like a moron he's the same dummy who claimed Dorian should have lost one of the most dominating wins in Olympia history.

He knows nothing about bodybuilding.

[BuffD]

98 is better than 99.  98 and 99 are better than 03.

[Hulkster]

99>>98.

enjoy the movies losers.

you will hate what you see.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part-two/1160132027

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/1998-mr-olympia-part-1/267563152

ronnie's quads have a lot less seperation compared to 99, as you can clearly see.

anyone who can view these clips and say ronnie 98 was better is a complete and delusional moron, and is only doing so to fit some agenda..as you guys will no doubt do..

ronnie was not only bigger, he was also more cut - especially in the lower body.

the proof is all there.

countdown to the excuses!!

 

[Hulkster]

He thinks if he continues to stick to his story he wont look as stupid and it only makes him look like more of a fucking moron. But he doesn't care about looking like a moron he's the same dummy who claimed Dorian should have lost one of the most dominating wins in Olympia history.

He knows nothing about bodybuilding.

I suggest you compare the two clips I posted. you will hate what you see.

and you will regret your words because you will look stupid.

and you will see that 'my story' -that ronnie himself has publicly agreed with - has been correct all along.

[Hulkster]

<ND and co frantically trying to come up with excuses after watching the video clips..>

 

[Shockwave]

99>>98.

enjoy the movies losers.

you will hate what you see.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part-two/1160132027

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/1998-mr-olympia-part-1/267563152

ronnie's quads have a lot less seperation compared to 99, as you can clearly see.

anyone who can view these clips and say ronnie 98 was better is a complete and delusional moron, and is only doing so to fit some agenda..as you guys will no doubt do..

ronnie was not only bigger, he was also more cut - especially in the lower body.

the proof is all there.

countdown to the excuses!!

 

you cant be serious? He looks far drier in 98 you retard. Im not even going to go into the rediculous contrast on the 99 vid,... Ill go ahead and say it for you  "Oh trying to call the vid fake, you nuthuggers are desperate"... Say what you want the contrast on the 99 video is retarded. And he STILL looks drier and more conditioned in 98, without the contrast. Fucking LOL again.

[NarcissisticDeity]

<ND and co frantically trying to come up with excuses after watching the video clips..>

 

So melodramatic and as I've explained to you I have both 99-98 on video , youknoq this because I posted a shot of Ronnie that looks nothing like the one you keep posting 

I watched both videos on multipe occasions and the pics and videos confirm why many proclaim 98 is his best , it'a no wonder Ronnie amended his original statement he's harder & drier in his first win , clearly evident in his delts, back and midsection

[affeman]

consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?

LOL

add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..

99>>98

Awesome, you really got us. An obscure black and white rough draft vs a crappy magazine scan; really proves your point.

I mean, can this guy get any more desperate....lol

[affeman]

One last time (as I won't get into that shit with you guys for years like you do lol, but keep it up, it's entertaining), I mean, these 2 pics sum up the scenario quite perfectly imo, and confirm what basically every single expert says; If you disagree Hulkster, then get your eyes checked; He was a few pounds heavier in 99, and exactly these few pounds worse in shape compared to 98 :