Nationalized healthcare will lead to decreased quality for many Americans.
Nothing proponents of the current plan can speak louder or articulate better than the Canadian Prime Minister's actions did. His feelings that no one in all of Canada was qualified to perform this procedure speaks volumes.
A doctor in Miami was referred to him for a specialized type of surgery. he chose it.
had this specialist been located in St. john NFLD, he would have had the operation there.
Do you have any idea what the population is in NFLD & Labrador? We're talking less than 500,000 in both provinces.
Less than the population of my city... in an area large enough to encompass 7 or 8 entire US states.
There aren't as many hospitals & doctors, or specialists... not due to a lack of quality, but rather due to geographical & population restrictions. It's the equivalent of Sarah Palin flying to Miami for the same surgery. Not because healthcare in Wasilla is crap, ...but because the population is so small, it would not support a high humber of specialists. how many hospitals do you think exist in Wasilla Alaska? How many highly specialized surgeons there?
the problemm is not quality of healthcare, ...the problem is a logistical one based upon population dispersal over a wide area. You guys who live in the USA sometimes fail to understand just how vast Canad, and Canadian provinces are. you guys who can literally drive through numerous states in one day, fail to understand that that it can sometimes take an entire day, just to get to the next province over. You're like the Europeans, who can drive for 3 hours and cross through several countries in the process. up here in Canada, you drive for 3 hours, ...you're not only not out of your province, ...chances are, ...you're not even out of your own area code.
This ENTIRE country has a total population roughly the same as California, ...and a good 80 - 85% of those live within 1.5 hours of the 49th parallel. our population base simply cannot support a large number of doctors, hospitals & specialists, ... we;re too few in number, ...and we're too healthy overall. however, despite the logistical and demographical hindrances... we are able to provide excellent quality healthcare to our citizens when they need it, and we're able to do it in an efficient and cost effective manner.
Yours is the equivalent of me saying telecommunications in the USA is crap, based on the fact that a friend of mine in Wyoming, had to wait from November to April, just to get a 2nd phone line in her house. Is that a reflection on the entire state of telecommunications in the USA? Or is that a reflection of the geographical & logistical nightmares of living on a remote mountain top in Wyoming where the ground is frozen most months in the year? Get real!
I find it interesting that the only people up in arms about this are American opponents to universal coverage.
I wonder what type of a picture one would see if the proponents of universal healthcare started showcasing the healthcare refugees that flood across our mutual border everyday, ...or those who have to endure medical "tourism jaunts" around the world, simply to get life saving surgery their insurance providers claim is unecessary, or deny coverage for. How many times have we seen coverage dropped and life saving surgeries cancelled because an individual failed to disclose a yeast infection from 8 years ago, ...or a bout with the flu from 5 years ago.