Author Topic: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?  (Read 26201 times)

FunkyMonk

  • Time Out
  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« on: March 02, 2010, 09:00:13 PM »
 People always say that Marcus Ruhl was not symetrical, and that's true. But let's face it, other guys won the Mr. Olympia with crap symetry, like Yates and Coleman in their later wins.

 I've seen Ruhl come in huge and more ripped than any other guy on stage. If they are gonna give the Olympia to big bloated pieces of shit, why no give it to RUHL, the king of big bloated freaks.

MJK

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 586
  • BB is not a sport it's a business.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2010, 09:01:43 PM »
Maybe he needs to take up acting. ::)
Welcome to Slovakia

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2010, 09:10:26 PM »
He didn't suck up to any officials? ::)
((-::

Doug_Steele

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10873
  • I'm totally Brolic, bro!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2010, 09:24:16 PM »
oil all in body  ;)
D

Dr Kincaid

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 867
  • Ice machine broken
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2010, 11:17:36 PM »
It's cause he is Euro.
But really he doesn't need a medal to be a champion.

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2010, 12:08:46 AM »
Uncrowned Mr Olympia. No doubt about it.
No doubt about it...

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2010, 12:16:18 AM »
The most underrated bber of all time.  It's all politics.  Bbing is not judged objectively.   :(

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2010, 12:20:31 AM »
 :o
No doubt about it...

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2010, 12:28:11 AM »
webcake proves me correct yet again with those stunning images.   :o

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2010, 12:33:02 AM »
People always say that Marcus Ruhl was not symetrical, and that's true. But let's face it, other guys won the Mr. Olympia with crap symetry, like Yates and Coleman in their later wins.

 I've seen Ruhl come in huge and more ripped than any other guy on stage. If they are gonna give the Olympia to big bloated pieces of shit, why no give it to RUHL, the king of big bloated freaks.

beacsue shape with marcus was not as good as other mass monsters like dorian, nasser, and ronnie..

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2010, 12:33:14 AM »
hahah i remember people use to post a pic of ruhl doing a lat spread from that show and chick actually claimed it was a fake pic. All those pics i just posted are screen shots from the video.
No doubt about it...

Adder

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2010, 03:28:16 AM »
Why did markus lost to nasser at 2000 mr olympia? ??? ??? ???


wtf? ???

AC Slater

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1176
  • The king of Bayside
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2010, 09:18:42 AM »
bb is not judged fairly.

hope this helps.
I dont like twinks.

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2010, 09:20:38 AM »
judges prefer the health look these days

CT_Muscle

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2010, 09:23:16 AM »
:o

I was there for that show. Was hoping Ruhl would beat Cutler  :'(

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2010, 09:24:04 AM »
Why did markus lost to nasser at 2000 mr olympia? ??? ??? ???


wtf? ???
I see more Oil in those pics than a global shot of the Middle east
L

emn1964

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6079
  • Getbig!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2010, 10:15:54 AM »
Because the IFBB does not hold fuking "contests".  Those "contests" are as much a competition as WWE's wrestling matches.  What doesn't anyone understand?

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2010, 10:24:06 AM »
judges prefer the health look these days
Who looks healthy Big Poppa?

tom joad

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4854
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2010, 10:25:46 AM »
Because the IFBB does not hold fuking "contests".  Those "contests" are as much a competition as WWE's wrestling matches.  What doesn't anyone understand?

c'mon Chick won the Masters Pro fair and square.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2010, 10:26:35 AM »
Maybe Marcus shunned a judges advances in the oil-up room?

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2010, 10:29:52 AM »
Maybe Marcus actually wasn't as good as people make out him to be. He might have been one of the biggest bodybuilders in history, but that don't mean shit when the bodyparts don't flow.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2010, 10:31:13 AM »
Maybe Marcus actually wasn't as good as people make out him to be. He might have been one of the biggest bodybuilders in history, but that don't mean shit when the bodyparts don't flow.

translation: I dont think he is pretty

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #22 on: March 03, 2010, 10:32:42 AM »
Maybe Marcus actually wasn't as good as people make out him to be. He might have been one of the biggest bodybuilders in history, but that don't mean shit when the bodyparts don't flow.
you know all about how male bodyparts are supposed to flow  :-\

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #23 on: March 03, 2010, 10:33:48 AM »
you know all about how male bodyparts are supposed to flow  :-\

 ::)

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2010, 10:34:56 AM »
it's his tiny triceps and synthol biceps, and he always had lower back fat  :(