Does Ruhl have better shape and proportions than those men (Cutler, Cormier, Jackson, etc.)? I'd say NO.
The only thing he has on them is size. He'd have to be spot-on AND have those guys be off, in order to beat them, in my view.
shut the fuck up already, theres a hell of alot more to it than 'aesthetically pleasing shape'...according to you steve reeves would win every single modern bbing contest -because NOBODY had the shape and proportions he did.
did Ronald have the best shape and proportions? no.
does fucking cutler have anything that can even be called 'shape'? hell no.
darrem charles should NEVER beat Ruhl in a bodybuilding contest, EVER.
Ruhl beats him on overall development, size, taller, wider, just as good 'shape' and taper, superior chest, delts, traps, quads, hams, calves (darrem doesnt even have legs AT ALL), biceps, back width and thickness, the list goes on... but darrem came 5% more 'conditioned' so he wins.
what a bunch of bullshit