Author Topic: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?  (Read 26128 times)

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16138
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #100 on: March 06, 2010, 03:18:58 PM »

How much mass can one guy put on??? :o

Imagine how Ruhl would have wiped the floor with those tiny tits at the Arnold stage today. :D

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #101 on: March 06, 2010, 03:23:58 PM »
How much mass can one guy put on??? :o

Imagine how Ruhl would have wiped the floor with thos tiny tits at the Arnold stage today. :D
He always gets jacked by judging not sure why..BB today is all about monsters.

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #102 on: March 06, 2010, 07:05:01 PM »
But he has, and he's beaten him more than once, particularly at the OLYMPIA (along with his 2003 Maximus Pro win).

So, if Ruhl can consistently LOSE to much smaller guys like Darrem Charles, his getting defeated by Jay Cutler ain't that big of a stretch.

Spare me your whining and blubbering.

none of those guys actually beat him. the judges placed them ahead, thats all.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Getbig!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #103 on: March 07, 2010, 09:13:45 PM »
none of those guys actually beat him. the judges placed them ahead, thats all.

WRONG!!

Atwood (A ROOKIE) beat Ruhl, one week after Ruhl's glorious win at the 2002 NOC.

And, Charles beat him for the 2003 Maximus Pro, bottom line.

As I've stated, Ruhl's losing to smaller bodybuilders is hardly a surprise. It's happened quite frequently.