Regardless,
He is right.
Bu the people that should be called are the swing Congressmen.
But more importantly is to call the people that they know live in potential no districts and have sit ins and rallies like last summer.
The biggest thing is to give money to the dissenting organizations in these areas so that they can continue to advertise and provoke their member to vote according to the district.
Like
http://protectpatientrights.org/about/?id=28There are many more organizations like this, especially anti abortion groups.
The antiabortion groups will be the first to cave so it will be necessary to lobby them the most.
If they pass the Senate bill then the fight is over.
BTW,
I fish lots, I belong to DU and to my local wildlife chapter.
Wildlife organizations use to work with the government to monitor fish and other wildlife.
The government doesn't have enough people to monitor every lake and to piss these groups off in order to gain acceptance for some urban wild life group like the Sierra club , is incredibly short sighted as wildlife management can only be accomplished with the inclusion of the hunters and fisherman as the main predators in most systems are gone and most fish licenses pay for the management and stocking of most lakes.
Illegal commercial fishing is responsible for the depletion of most fishing stocks.
As recreational fisherman only take a very small percentage of the overall fishing catch and pay far more in tourist dollars to do it.
Many areas will suffer if a bill like this goes through.
Especially around Maine, Washington and Florida. Where sport fishing brings in big tourist dollars.
But then again most urban people have never killed an animal or seen an animal killed for food accept on film. Which is a shame since most people eat meat. So again not a surprise.
The democrats are now an urban only party and could care less about rural people or rural votes, since they don't support the urban democrat agenda of Pelosi and Obama. So no surprise though.
