Blame and comparrison

[BodyProSite]

When bammer was campaigning, he promised us all that the way congress and the white house do business and was run was going to change. No more corrupt politicians, back room deals, partisan politics, and many more things that Americans were fed up with.

With that being said why is it that everytime bipartisanship and transparency don't happen or there are people being bought, or crooked deals, or unethical behavior or any of that it is excused and compared to something bush did?  What bush did should be irrelevant, Mr. bammer said that those days were over. That means that no matter what bush did, for whatever reason and however bad it was that for it to continue to happen is inexcusable. But for some reason there seems to more of it everyday. I thought that was going to change?
 
i am not saying that bush left bammer the best situation cause he didn't. however the financial situation has nothing to do with the stopping of corrupt, money grubbing backroom deal supporting politicians, and that is what Mr. bammer said was going to be the biggest change. 

So why wont libs stop blaming bush and own up to what that entire campaign was based upon!!!   its been over a year

[12secGT]

When bammer was campaigning, he promised us all that the way congress and the white house do business and was run was going to change. No more corrupt politicians, back room deals, partisan politics, and many more things that Americans were fed up with.

With that being said why is it that everytime bipartisanship and transparency don't happen or there are people being bought, or crooked deals, or unethical behavior or any of that it is excused and compared to something bush did?  What bush did should be irrelevant, Mr. bammer said that those days were over. That means that no matter what bush did, for whatever reason and however bad it was that for it to continue to happen is inexcusable. But for some reason there seems to more of it everyday. I thought that was going to change?
 
i am not saying that bush left bammer the best situation cause he didn't. however the financial situation has nothing to do with the stopping of corrupt, money grubbing backroom deal supporting politicians, and that is what Mr. bammer said was going to be the biggest change. 

So why wont libs stop blaming bush and own up to what that entire campaign was based upon!!!   its been over a year

This is the way they do things in Chicago politics. Obama BS'd his way to the top of the heap, only to realize the heap smells worse than the bottom. He is the worst president we have seen up to this point at any time in American history.

[BodyProSite]

It baffles me that people still support this guy and his goonies, I mean almost every day literealy there is a breaking new scandals , and record breaking number statistics,  (bad record breaking)  and they could give a shit less what americans think ,, full steam ahead with  communist care

[SAMSON123]

When bammer was campaigning, he promised us all that the way congress and the white house do business and was run was going to change. No more corrupt politicians, back room deals, partisan politics, and many more things that Americans were fed up with.

With that being said why is it that everytime bipartisanship and transparency don't happen or there are people being bought, or crooked deals, or unethical behavior or any of that it is excused and compared to something bush did?  What bush did should be irrelevant, Mr. bammer said that those days were over. That means that no matter what bush did, for whatever reason and however bad it was that for it to continue to happen is inexcusable. But for some reason there seems to more of it everyday. I thought that was going to change?
 
i am not saying that bush left bammer the best situation cause he didn't. however the financial situation has nothing to do with the stopping of corrupt, money grubbing backroom deal supporting politicians, and that is what Mr. bammer said was going to be the biggest change. 

So why wont libs stop blaming bush and own up to what that entire campaign was based upon!!!   its been over a year

Only dummies listen to politicians...Politician s do what politicians do

[BodyProSite]

and the dumbest of the dumb buy into ct"s

[240 is Back]

well, the title "CT' and the title "historical fact" are sometimes separated by nothing more than the date.

"The earth revolves around the sun" used to be a conspiracy theory. 
"Hitler's Reichtag fire was an inside job" used to be a conspiracy theory.

[BodyProSite]

there is one big diff,  evidence

[240 is Back]

"there is one big diff,  evidence "


Yes... but.... history is written by the winners.  If Hitler had won WWII, we would have never known Reichtag inside job.  If afghanistan and iraq had defeated us, well, lol... that's not gonna happen...

But we don't know the evidence of 911 because the investigation was very small in scope, underfunded, and ignored very large pieces that would have helped us know who else knew.  They admitted they were told not to follow the money or anything else that went beyond 19 pricks with blades.  The huge pools of molten steel that burned above max fuel temps for 6 weeks, consistent with explosives but impossible with jet fuel?  911 Commission deemed it irrelevant because 'it had nothing to do with al-Q'.  

So that's the diff, evidence, you're right.