911 Conspiracy question.

[drkaje]

What exactly is it people need to hear/read for closure?

[chaos]

What exactly is it people need to hear/read for closure?

The CT cunts need to hear that the government did it all for oil, insurance money, to get out of repairing asbestos infected buildings, etc, etc.......

[OzmO]

A complex answer to a tragic event.

[240 is Back]

yeah, really, all us message board nobodies will argue about regurgitated news and documentaries...

but history will determine it.  the scientists, lawyers and leaders will look at what happened.  In 30 or 40 years, we'll have a pretty good idea what happened.  All we're doing is debating "what if" on some 10 year old shit.  We might as well be debating the outcome of the 2003 super bowl, ya know?

I think that's why I went from being so 'gung ho' to just not noticing when it's on tv anymore. History will settle it.  The official story is incomplete, it's something we can all agree one.  maybe one day it'll be settled, who knows. 

I watched the hurt locker tonight.  sad movie.

[OzmO]

yeah, really, all us message board nobodies will argue about regurgitated news and documentaries...

but history will determine it.  the scientists, lawyers and leaders will look at what happened.  In 30 or 40 years, we'll have a pretty good idea what happened.  All we're doing is debating "what if" on some 10 year old shit.  We might as well be debating the outcome of the 2003 super bowl, ya know?

I think that's why I went from being so 'gung ho' to just not noticing when it's on tv anymore. History will settle it.  The official story is incomplete, it's something we can all agree one.  maybe one day it'll be settled, who knows. 

I watched the hurt locker tonight.  sad movie.

I knew there was a conspiracy with Tampa Bay winning. 

[240 is Back]

haha yes, it was all too convenient that Gruden comes to town from the raiders and beats them the same year.

I'll wait for the Super Bowl Commission report, however, before passing judgment.

[SAMSON123]

yeah, really, all us message board nobodies will argue about regurgitated news and documentaries...

but history will determine it.  the scientists, lawyers and leaders will look at what happened.  In 30 or 40 years, we'll have a pretty good idea what happened.  All we're doing is debating "what if" on some 10 year old shit.  We might as well be debating the outcome of the 2003 super bowl, ya know?

I think that's why I went from being so 'gung ho' to just not noticing when it's on tv anymore. History will settle it.  The official story is incomplete, it's something we can all agree one.  maybe one day it'll be settled, who knows. 

I watched the hurt locker tonight.  sad movie.

You should watch IN THE VALLEY OF ELAH

[Cardfan]

Can't stop laughing at you retarded fuckers........please stop.

[ToxicAvenger]

What exactly is it people need to hear/read for closure?

aliens 

[drkaje]

aliens 

That's one of the reasons conspiracy geeks don't get taken seriously.

[ToxicAvenger]

That's one of the reasons conspiracy geeks don't get taken seriously.

so aliens cant possibly exist cause hollywood made a few movies about them....

[drkaje]

so aliens cant possibly exist cause hollywood made a few movies about them....

They must exist for people like you.

[ToxicAvenger]

They must exist for people like you.

i simply dont discount the possibility mang

[12secGT]

They must exist for people like you.

That answers it completely... the truthers believe in UFO's... what's next? The easter Bunny and Santa are real too right?

[OzmO]

That answers it completely... the truthers believe in UFO's... what's next? The easter Bunny and Santa are real too right?

Aren't they?   

[Soul Crusher]

What exactly is it people need to hear/read for closure?

GWB drunk at a bar confessing to the whole plot. 

[OzmO]

GWB drunk at a bar confessing to the whole plot. 

no no no

GWB's water boarded confession!

[quadzilla456]

yeah, really, all us message board nobodies will argue about regurgitated news and documentaries...

but history will determine it.  the scientists, lawyers and leaders will look at what happened.  In 30 or 40 years, we'll have a pretty good idea what happened.  All we're doing is debating "what if" on some 10 year old shit.  We might as well be debating the outcome of the 2003 super bowl, ya know?

I think that's why I went from being so 'gung ho' to just not noticing when it's on tv anymore. History will settle it.  The official story is incomplete, it's something we can all agree one.  maybe one day it'll be settled, who knows. 

I watched the hurt locker tonight.  sad movie.

I agree with this. Give more time. All I know is it smells like shit. That is all.

[TEsticles]

so that means that the 93 attempt on the wtc was a clinton conspiracy. or that the terrorists couldnt get up the courage to hit it again higher up, and how they wondered....by plane!!

[quadzilla456]

so that means that the 93 attempt on the wtc was a clinton conspiracy. or that the terrorists couldnt get up the courage to hit it again higher up, and how they wondered....by plane!!

It could also mean that the 93 attempt just gave them ideas for 911. Who knows  If you go back in US history conspiracies have been there all along. As if it is inbred in the country. The saying "it sounds to good to be true" and "where there's smoke there's fire" applies to conspiracy logic as well. A conspiracy theory starts when the official explanation of events does not satisfy. And also where other motives come to play. And there is just enough of a hint to suggest foul play.

Anyone that believes the "Official Story" of 911 has not done any research and are extremely complacent and ignorant. If you can accept that then the next question is "Why do they want to force this "Official Story"? Why not just say what really happened?" And this is where the smoke signals go up.

[newmom]

i simply dont discount the possibility mang

x2

[OzmO]

I agree with this. Give more time. All I know is it smells like shit. That is all.

So does the moon landing.  Point being that smoke isn't sufficient enough to prove there's a fire in things like this. And then there's also the question of what degree the fire is.  Does the 9/11 report cover somethings up?  Probably.  But what is it covering up?  Incompetence, forehand knowledge or an inside job?

[Hugo Chavez]

So does the moon landing.  Point being that smoke isn't sufficient enough to prove there's a fire in things like this. And then there's also the question of what degree the fire is.  Does the 9/11 report cover somethings up?  Probably.  But what is it covering up?  Incompetence, forehand knowledge or an inside job?

the moon landing smells like shit? really, I would like to see where you think it does?  Please list the valid stinks around the moon landing and don't make me answer shit I already have here a billions times.  I've watched everything on it, heard all the complaints, investigated myself had everyone ignore my investigation and I could not possibly at this point say that the moon landing stinks.  But, unlike the moon landing, there are so many gaping holes and questions about 9/11 that I can say something stinks there and needs looked into.  I cannot at this point say that about the moon landing.  So what stinks about the moon landing?

[OzmO]

the moon landing smells like shit? really, I would like to see where you think it does?  Please list the valid stinks around the moon landing and don't make me answer shit I already have here a billions times.  I've watched everything on it, heard all the complaints, investigated myself had everyone ignore my investigation and I could not possibly at this point say that the moon landing stinks.  But, unlike the moon landing, there are so many gaping holes and questions about 9/11 that I can say something stinks there and needs looked into.  I cannot at this point say that about the moon landing.  So what stinks about the moon landing?

I have no interest in getting into some heated exchange with you.  I feel you are already coming off overly defensive.  And I apologize if I am misunderstanding you if that is not your intention.   If however, you really want to discuss what you are asking, understand I'm not trying to poke holes in anyone's theories, research or beliefs with that post.

I'm making a comparison metaphorically.  Please re-read my post.  I'm only saying that's many events raise questions.  Some of those question are legitimate some are not when the truth is finally found like you did with your Moon landing research. And that the presence of questions in itself do not guarantee deception, miss-doing, conspiracy etc.  I don't think there are gaping holes about 9/11 in the sense that 9/11 was an inside job.  I think that is very far fetch and whacked.  What's more plausible, (and you know we'll never know) is that it was forewarned or there was gross incompetence from very important people and agencies.

[Hugo Chavez]

I have no interest in getting into some heated exchange with you.  I feel you are already coming off overly defensive.  And I apologize if I am misunderstanding you if that is not your intention.   If however, you really want to discuss what you are asking, understand I'm not trying to poke holes in anyone's theories, research or beliefs with that post.

I'm making a comparison metaphorically.  Please re-read my post.  I'm only saying that's many events raise questions.  Some of those question are legitimate some are not when the truth is finally found like you did with your Moon landing research. And that the presence of questions in itself do not guarantee deception, miss-doing, conspiracy etc.  I don't think there are gaping holes about 9/11 in the sense that 9/11 was an inside job.  I think that is very far fetch and whacked.  What's more plausible, (and you know we'll never know) is that it was forewarned or there was gross incompetence from very important people and agencies.

I didn't see who I was replying to or I wouldn't have.  anyway, you did reply affirming that something stinks like shit with the moon landing via quote of another.  After everything that's been covered and posted here on the moon landing, I don't know how you can use it as an example.  Not one single person here was able to excuse the evidence I presented on the moon landing.  A thread that you were aware of too.  Almost everything else around the moon landing hoax ct has been absolutely debunked.  None of that can be said about 9/11 as positively as it can be said for the moon landing.