Author Topic: .  (Read 14987 times)

GymTime

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 168
.
« on: March 14, 2010, 03:18:04 PM »
.

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2010, 03:25:15 PM »
Zack Khan looks great with a beard

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2010, 03:27:16 PM »
Your friend looks like he's carrying more fat than muscle. Not hating, just saying.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41309
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2010, 03:27:28 PM »
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
7

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2010, 03:29:11 PM »
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend was had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
QFT

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16136
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2010, 03:34:33 PM »



LOL Are you blind? Compare Heaths left arm with the one of your buddy once again, maybe you can spot a slight difference? ::)

clued-up

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4374
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2010, 03:44:24 PM »


a lot of these pros seem to have abnormally small heads.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2010, 03:44:37 PM »
Here's a pic of a friend of mine at the arnold classic with supposedly some of the biggest arms in the biz.  These pros must all be really short, and when compared with eachother they look "big", but when next to a normal sized person who is in decent shape, they really dont look all that huge.  We need more arnold's and lou ferrigno's in this business....some truly huge bbers.





The main difference is that Zacks arms is 100% muscle while your "buddys" arm is skinny fat.

Its like taking an overweight dude next to a pro bodybuilder and claim that the overweight "owns" the bodybuilder.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41309
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2010, 03:47:40 PM »


a lot of these pros seem to have abnormally small heads.

When you go from a 180lbs 10% bf to 280% 10% bf the head doesn't grow.  Normal size head abnormal size bodies.
7

James Blunt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3272
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #9 on: March 14, 2010, 03:54:37 PM »
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
This is quite true.

Oh yeah, simply huge... Friends don't let friends wear T-shirts that are too small for them. Tell that guy that shirt is ridiculous.


just_a_pilgrim

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2455
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #10 on: March 14, 2010, 03:57:47 PM »
Unless you have dieted down before you don't realise what you've got to lose to get that lean. You look much bigger with the shirt off but with it on you look smaller.

balight

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
  • East-European gigolo
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #11 on: March 14, 2010, 04:00:56 PM »
I guess he wanted to say, Zack Khan looks like a fuckin' giant if he stands alone. Now next to a normal person, he inst so  mindblowingly huge. Here we're just talking about physical dimensions, not hardness, bf, etc.

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #12 on: March 14, 2010, 04:04:35 PM »
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
this

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #13 on: March 14, 2010, 04:05:19 PM »

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #14 on: March 14, 2010, 04:09:35 PM »
Zach Khan's forearm is as big as that dude's upper arm. And so is Phil Heath's.

Have your friend diet down enough, where you can actually see definition.

LITTLE JOHN

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 159
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #15 on: March 14, 2010, 04:27:58 PM »
I was in a gym once with DJ and let me tell his arms are massive made my 19s look like twigs.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41309
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2010, 04:31:02 PM »
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive.  

So you're saying that guy in those pics if dieted down to 4-5% bf would have 17-18 inch arms?  Bull-fucking shit.  Because the amount of fat on that arm now with zero definition would put his arms at 19 or 20 inches now.  Are you saying his arms are 19 or 20?  18 at best now and 16 at best dieted down....AT BEST.
7

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #17 on: March 14, 2010, 04:37:43 PM »
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.

Haha no.  ::) What if we split the argument and say 16.  ;)

Right now I mean.

Per Se

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 852
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #18 on: March 14, 2010, 04:38:18 PM »
are you BLIND????

In the pics u posted, Khan and Heath's arms look WAAAAAAY thicker!  ::)

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #19 on: March 14, 2010, 04:44:02 PM »
You could have an argument with Khan's shoulders and Heath's width but not much with their arms.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #20 on: March 14, 2010, 04:49:08 PM »
Even with angle on Phil's arms he looks like he has you friend by 3-4 inches, not including definition and thickness, dieted down, that disparity would possibly grow to 5-6 inches. So roughly your friend would look like a string bean compared to Heath

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #21 on: March 14, 2010, 04:51:53 PM »
Brutal myspace angles. Khan destroys your friend. You is starting closer to the camera and more side on. You are a fucking idiot.

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17201
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #22 on: March 14, 2010, 04:58:16 PM »
I agree it's mostly angle and also on the bodyfat issue, if normal people dieted down to low bodyfat they would be tiny.

Look at this:





and then this:





 8)

benchmstr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12476
  • Raging drunk
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #23 on: March 14, 2010, 04:59:26 PM »
bench

LITTLE JOHN

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 159
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #24 on: March 14, 2010, 05:01:16 PM »
Now that bitch has some arms.