Author Topic: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?  (Read 6477 times)

The Luke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3017
  • What's that in the bushes?
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #75 on: March 18, 2010, 12:47:33 PM »
Fool.  I said the average salary was 40k correct?  did I back that up yes or no?    

...you claimed median income was $40k, then highlighted a sentence from a copy'n'paste article as proof.

Nothing wrong with that, EXCEPT you highlighted a sentence in the article you posted showing median household income and the median income of men and women who worked full-time year round... big difference. The very next sentence after the one you highlighted clearly gives the median income as $26k.

Add to this the aggressive boastful comments about embarrassing and owning people and it's clear you just didn't understand the difference and aren't qualified to engage in discussions that require good reading comprehension.

This is understandable if English is not your first language (as I believe), but it seems you still don't understand the difference as evidenced by this recent post:
I said the average salary was 40k correct?  did I back that up yes or no?    

Firstly you made no mention of average salary, (as the comment was a rebuttal to my claim regarding median income) just this abusive comment:
Remember the last debate we had with your "points"?  I embarassed the shit out of you on the facts and substance.  So if you cant deal with it and now want to cry about, thats your problem and maybe you should stop bringing knives to a fight with guns.  

Secondly, you didn't even show the average salary to be $40k. You showed median household income to be $50k and the median income of men who worked full-time year-round to be $45k.
In 2007, the median annual household income rose 1.3% to $50,233.00 according to the Census Bureau.[4] The real median earnings of men who worked full time, year-round climbed between 2006 and 2007, from $43,460 to $45,113.
...only averaging between the median incomes of fully-employed men working full-time year-round and the median incomes of fully-employed women working full-time year-round gives the $40k you inferred... a year figure and that's not even applicable because men outnumber women so much in these categories that a simple equally weighted average is obviously wrong. Not to mention this doesn't include part-time or seasonal salaried workers.
So you didn't understand that either.

So... No.
No, you never said it.
No, you never backed it up.
No, no it's not $40k.

But add to all this the simple fact that had you read just one sentence further into the article YOU posted, just one sentence beyond the sentence YOU highlighted to "embarrass" me... you would have clearly seen the median income stated as $26k. Plain, black-and-white, obvious.

So you posted a detailed and referenced citation of a fact I asserted, while claiming I fabricated it, and STILL don't understand your mistake.


Now do you understand why no one bothers to engage you on your delusional rantings?

Other posters don't back down or disappear because you are always right... it's just no one has the time to re-educate someone who doesn't understand why he's wrong; and doesn't even want to understand.


The Luke

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #76 on: March 18, 2010, 12:52:43 PM »
...you claimed median income was $40k, then highlighted a sentence from a copy'n'paste article as proof.

Nothing wrong with that, EXCEPT you highlighted a sentence in the article you posted showing median household income and the median income of men and women who worked full-time year round... big difference. The very next sentence after the one you highlighted clearly gives the median income as $26k.

Add to this the aggressive boastful comments about embarrassing and owning people and it's clear you just didn't understand the difference and aren't qualified to engage in discussions that require good reading comprehension.

This is understandable if English is not your first language (as I believe), but it seems you still don't understand the difference as evidenced by this recent post:
Firstly you made no mention of average salary, (as the comment was a rebuttal to my claim regarding median income) just this abusive comment:
Secondly, you didn't even show the average salary to be $40k. You showed median household income to be $50k and the median income of men who worked full-time year-round to be $45k....only averaging between the median incomes of fully-employed men working full-time year-round and the median incomes of fully-employed women working full-time year-round gives the $40k you inferred... a year figure and that's not even applicable because men outnumber women so much in these categories that a simple equally weighted average is obviously wrong. Not to mention this doesn't include part-time or seasonal salaried workers.
So you didn't understand that either.

So... No.
No, you never said it.
No, you never backed it up.
No, no it's not $40k.

But add to all this the simple fact that had you read just one sentence further into the article YOU posted, just one sentence beyond the sentence YOU highlighted to "embarrass" me... you would have clearly seen the median income stated as $26k. Plain, black-and-white, obvious.

So you posted a detailed and referenced citation of a fact I asserted, while claiming I fabricated it, and STILL don't understand your mistake.


Now do you understand why no one bothers to engage you on your delusional rantings?

Other posters don't back down or disappear because you are always right... it's just no one has the time to re-educate someone who doesn't understand why he's wrong; and doesn't even want to understand.


The Luke

Show me my quote where i said the "MEDIAN" and i will retract. 

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #77 on: March 18, 2010, 12:56:00 PM »
...you claimed median income was $40k, then highlighted a sentence from a copy'n'paste article as proof.

Nothing wrong with that, EXCEPT you highlighted a sentence in the article you posted showing median household income and the median income of men and women who worked full-time year round... big difference. The very next sentence after the one you highlighted clearly gives the median income as $26k.

Add to this the aggressive boastful comments about embarrassing and owning people and it's clear you just didn't understand the difference and aren't qualified to engage in discussions that require good reading comprehension.

This is understandable if English is not your first language (as I believe), but it seems you still don't understand the difference as evidenced by this recent post:
Firstly you made no mention of average salary, (as the comment was a rebuttal to my claim regarding median income) just this abusive comment:
Secondly, you didn't even show the average salary to be $40k. You showed median household income to be $50k and the median income of men who worked full-time year-round to be $45k....only averaging between the median incomes of fully-employed men working full-time year-round and the median incomes of fully-employed women working full-time year-round gives the $40k you inferred... a year figure and that's not even applicable because men outnumber women so much in these categories that a simple equally weighted average is obviously wrong. Not to mention this doesn't include part-time or seasonal salaried workers.
So you didn't understand that either.

So... No.
No, you never said it.
No, you never backed it up.
No, no it's not $40k.

But add to all this the simple fact that had you read just one sentence further into the article YOU posted, just one sentence beyond the sentence YOU highlighted to "embarrass" me... you would have clearly seen the median income stated as $26k. Plain, black-and-white, obvious.

So you posted a detailed and referenced citation of a fact I asserted, while claiming I fabricated it, and STILL don't understand your mistake.


Now do you understand why no one bothers to engage you on your delusional rantings?

Other posters don't back down or disappear because you are always right... it's just no one has the time to re-educate someone who doesn't understand why he's wrong; and doesn't even want to understand.


The Luke




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #78 on: March 18, 2010, 12:59:19 PM »
Luke is trying to engage is nonsense semantics as usual.  I said the average salary is around 40k and i backed that up.  If he wants to include people non- working and use the other figure, fine, its pure garbage. 

Perfect example of two families. 

Family 1 -

1 worker - 5 kids makes 100k a year. 

1 worker 1 kid makes 100k a year. 

What is the average salary? 


Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #79 on: March 18, 2010, 01:01:46 PM »
Please post my facial quote...I'd love to see it!
3333 might have saved it but you made it and I deleted it and you were banned for 30 days after already having been warned.  Don't deny it.  It happened.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #80 on: March 18, 2010, 01:03:57 PM »
3333 might have saved it but you made it and I deleted it and you were banned for 30 days after already having been warned.  Don't deny it.  It happened.

Yeah right, I have never delted shit and you know it.  I have defended every single post I ever made.  I claimed that the average salary is 40k, which it is. 

If luke thinks he someone pwned me bby includuing the fiogure which includes NON working people over 14 y/o fine, let him have his moment. 

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #81 on: March 18, 2010, 01:05:32 PM »
...you claimed median income was $40k, then highlighted a sentence from a copy'n'paste article as proof.

Nothing wrong with that, EXCEPT you highlighted a sentence in the article you posted showing median household income and the median income of men and women who worked full-time year round... big difference. The very next sentence after the one you highlighted clearly gives the median income as $26k.

Add to this the aggressive boastful comments about embarrassing and owning people and it's clear you just didn't understand the difference and aren't qualified to engage in discussions that require good reading comprehension.

This is understandable if English is not your first language (as I believe), but it seems you still don't understand the difference as evidenced by this recent post:
Firstly you made no mention of average salary, (as the comment was a rebuttal to my claim regarding median income) just this abusive comment:
Secondly, you didn't even show the average salary to be $40k. You showed median household income to be $50k and the median income of men who worked full-time year-round to be $45k....only averaging between the median incomes of fully-employed men working full-time year-round and the median incomes of fully-employed women working full-time year-round gives the $40k you inferred... a year figure and that's not even applicable because men outnumber women so much in these categories that a simple equally weighted average is obviously wrong. Not to mention this doesn't include part-time or seasonal salaried workers.
So you didn't understand that either.

So... No.
No, you never said it.
No, you never backed it up.
No, no it's not $40k.

But add to all this the simple fact that had you read just one sentence further into the article YOU posted, just one sentence beyond the sentence YOU highlighted to "embarrass" me... you would have clearly seen the median income stated as $26k. Plain, black-and-white, obvious.

So you posted a detailed and referenced citation of a fact I asserted, while claiming I fabricated it, and STILL don't understand your mistake.


Now do you understand why no one bothers to engage you on your delusional rantings?

Other posters don't back down or disappear because you are always right... it's just no one has the time to re-educate someone who doesn't understand why he's wrong; and doesn't even want to understand.


The Luke

The Luke taking 333's out to the woodshed. Gotta love it!  :D :D :D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #82 on: March 18, 2010, 01:06:40 PM »
United States Average Salaries & Expenditures 
 
 
 Contents
Average Employment Income   Average Salary per Job   Average Salary per Sector   Total Personal Average Income   
Consumption Expenditure   Workforce Composition   Vacation Time   References
 
   
Average Employment Income :
Annual, per Worker, incl. dependent & self employment 
     Disposable    Gross  (1)   
2005   31,410 31,410    42,028

42,028    constant 2005 dollars

current dollars
 
(1)    Based on dependent+self employment personal income and ratio of earners to household size.
 
Source: U.S. Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey [19], 2005 (2.5 persons and 1.3 earners per household).
 
 
http://www.worldsalaries.org/usa.shtml

________________________ ________________________ ________________________


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #83 on: March 18, 2010, 01:07:36 PM »
Ok fake soldier.  Did you even read whatt he debate is fool? 

Of course not, you are too busy jerking off on your dog.   

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #84 on: March 18, 2010, 01:11:38 PM »
Yeah right, I have never delted shit and you know it.  I have defended every single post I ever made.  I claimed that the average salary is 40k, which it is. 

If luke thinks he someone pwned me bby includuing the fiogure which includes NON working people over 14 y/o fine, let him have his moment. 
honest to god, you have to slow way the fuck down.  You so FAILED in your reading of my post.  I replied to mons after he was acting like he never made the facial comment.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #85 on: March 18, 2010, 01:12:37 PM »
Yeah, the NYT is really a fringe RW source you drunk red headed fool.

________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ____________

Average U.S. Income Showed First Rise Over 2000
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
www.nyt.com
Published: August 25, 2008


Americans enjoyed higher average income in 2006 for the first time since 2000, when the last economic expansion ended, the latest tax data show.

Skip to next paragraph
 
The New York Times

Related

Times Topics: U.S. Economy Adjusted gross income reported on tax returns in 2006 averaged $58,029. In 2006 dollars that was an increase of $739, or 1.2 percent, from the $57,289 average in 2000, analysis of Internal Revenue Service data showed.
[/color]

Total income increased by $619.2 billion or 8.3 percent, all of which went to those making more than $75,000, and 42 percent of which went to the roughly one in 400 taxpayers who made more than $1 million in 2006.

Average income fell sharply in 2001 and in 2002, when it dropped to $51,870, off nearly 10 percent from 2000, tax data show. The average grew slightly in 2003.

Average income grew significantly in 2004, rising $2,291, and again in 2005, when the average increased by $2,210. Income growth continued in 2006, but at a much slower pace, increasing by $1,369 over the 2005 average once inflation is taken into account.

Salaries and wages, by far the largest source of income, nearly returned to the 2000 average in 2006. However, among the highest-paid workers, both total and average wages fell, an indication of how the Internet bubble had concentrated gains among a relatively few workers.

The average wage in 2006 was $46,996, down $101, or a fraction of 1 percent, from $47,097 in 2000. Average wages in this decade hit a low of $45,956 in 2003, the I.R.S. data show.

Among workers with salaries of less than $1 million, the average wage in 2006 was up $170 from 2000.

However, salaries fell noticeably among the tiny slice of taxpayers whose total income was $1 million or more, a threshold that the I.R.S. does not adjust for inflation. The number of wage earners in this high-income group soared over six years, up 42.9 percent, to 285,759 of the 116.4 million taxpayers reporting wages in 2006.

Despite this rise in the number of high-wage earners, their total wages declined by $2.4 billion, or almost 1 percent, to $313.3 billion.

The decline in total wages at the top was solely among the narrow segment of wage earners with total income of $5 million or more, the same group that was the big winner from dot-com era stock options, reported as wages on tax returns. The average wage of these 33,309 workers fell almost 37 percent, to $3.5 million in 2006 from $5.5 million in 2000, analysis of the tax data showed.




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #86 on: March 18, 2010, 01:23:16 PM »
This was my quote that Luke was referring to.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: kcballer on March 17, 2010, 01:25:10 PM
100-150K is reasonable.  That would put them above 84% of all Americans and 1 to 1.5 times the average income.  More than fair compensation if you ask me. 


Ok.  Lets look at something KC - they have to spend 250k for their education and make that up over say 35 years if they retire at 65.  So they are spending lets say roughly $7,150.00 a year for their education.  So now they are making $142,000 a year correct? 

Ok,  lets remember that they gave up 8 years of working to get their degree.  If the average person makes 40k a year in this country that equals about the sum of $320,000 in defraid earning correct?  Over 35 years that amounts to an additional $9,143.00 a year.   So now the doctor is making $132,857 a year.  That is $2,554 a week. 

So lets says the doctor works 60-70 hours a week.  At 60 hours a week the doctor is making $42.66 an hour. 

Does that sound like a lot to you KC considering what union trades people make who take coffeee breaks every five minutes?


If the Doctors lives in NYC where i live that is not squat!   

________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ____

Do you care to retract your nonsense Luke?  Or do you want to cry like a bitch again and run off with your tail between your legs? 

The average salary as I proved is about 40k a year.  I did not say MEDIAN income, including non-working people over 14, so stop your bs. 

The Luke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3017
  • What's that in the bushes?
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #87 on: March 18, 2010, 01:31:36 PM »
Show me my quote where i said the "MEDIAN" and i will retract.  

You never mentioned anything about median income... you don't even understand the term.

I mentioned the US median income of $28,500 as an example of a commonly known fact that couldn't be mentioned on this board because morons would insist upon citations and references, then promptly dismiss such references if they were presented:
After all, if I were to make a crazy claim, for example, claiming that the median income in the US is $28,500 per year... a claim at odds with 333386's unquestioned straight-out-of-ass guesstimate of $40,000 cited in the "How much should doctors make" thread and not cited or proven.

No one who disagrees with me should be expected to check that fact when attempting to counter that assertion... it's perfectly appropriate for them to dismiss that FACT solely because no reference was cited.

After all, if we forced the conservatives to check the facts every time they disagreed with a some tidbit of common knowledge... why, they'd be totally unable to maintain the paradigm of self-delusion that drives their thinking.

You, 333386, are just such a moron... and so you immediately attacked me:

You have a track record of making stuff up and being wrong, Skip and I don't.  

Remember the last debate we had with your "points"?  I embarassed the shit out of you on the facts and substance.  So if you cant deal with it and now want to cry about, thats your problem and maybe you should stop bringing knives to a fight with guns.  

________________________ ________________________ ________________________ _______________________

  Household income in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For information on the income of individuals, see Personal income in the United States.

 
Median household income in the United States, by county, in 2008Household income is a measure commonly used by the United States government and private institutions. That measure counts all the income of all residents over the age of 18 in each household, including not only all wages and salaries, but such items as unemployment insurance, disability payments, child support payments, regular rental receipts, as well as any personal business, investment, or other kinds of income received routinely.[1] The residents of the household do not have to be related to the head of the household for their earnings to be considered part of the household's income.[2] As households tend to share a similar economic context, the use of household income remains among the most widely accepted measures of income. That the size of a household is not commonly taken into account in such measures may distort any analysis of fluctuations within or among the household income categories, and may render direct comparisons between quintiles difficult or even impossible.[3]

In 2007, the median annual household income rose 1.3% to $50,233.00 according to the Census Bureau.[4] The real median earnings of men who worked full time, year-round climbed between 2006 and 2007, from $43,460 to $45,113 (about 3.6 time minimum wage in 2006 to 3.7 time minimum wage in 2007). For women, the corresponding increase was from $33,437 to $35,102 (2.8 and 2.9 times minimum wage respectively). The median income per household member (including all working and non-working members above the age of 14) was $26,036 in 2006.[5] In 2006, there were approximately 116,011,000 households in the United States. 1.93% of all households had annual incomes exceeding $250,000.[6] 12.3% fell below the federal poverty threshold[7] and the bottom 20% earned less than $19,178.[8] The aggregate income distribution is highly concentrated towards the top, with the top 6.37% earning roughly one third of all income, and those with upper-middle incomes control a large, though declining, share of the total earned income.[3][9] Income inequality in the United States, which had decreased slowly after World War II until 1970, began to increase in the 1970s until reaching a peak in 2006. It declined a little in 2007.[10] Households in the top quintile, 77% of which had two or more income earners, had incomes exceeding $91,705. Households in the mid quintile, with a mean of approximately one income earner per household had incomes between $36,000 and $57,657. Households in the lowest quintile had incomes less than $19,178 and the majority had no income earner.[11]

I then pointed out that your post was a perfect example of the political illiteracy I was complaining about:
-you confused median household income with median income
-you confused median income of men working full-time year-round with median income
-you confused median income of women working full-time year-round with median income

...and you failed to notice that the very next sentence after the one YOU highlighted to refute (and "embarrass") me, in the article YOU cited, actually gave the median income for the US as $26,500.


But you still didn't understand, so you backtracked and claimed:
Fool.  I said the average salary was 40k correct?  did I back that up yes or no?    

...but, as I've shown pretty clearly.
-you never said it.
-you never showed it
-and no it isn't


Why not simply admit you don't understand the difference between median and average...? (in fact you have a poor grasp of math and statistics)


Now you claim that I'm playing semantics... why? Because I made an unsupported claim, and YOU cited a reference that backed me up; but didn't understand the reference and didn't realise YOU actually made MY point.


So... Cliff Notes:
-Luke claims Fact A as something Palin-voters like 333386 wouldn't accept
-333386 doesn't accept Fact A and refutes Luke's claim with a citation showing unrelated Fact B (but also actually showing Fact A to be true)
-Luke explains the citation proves Fact A
-333386 claims Fact B is Fact A
-Luke explains fact B is not Fact A
-333386 pretends he never claimed Fact B, showing he doesn't even understand the difference between fact A and Fact B
-Luke explains that this is a perfect example of 333386 not understanding or accepting basic facts
-333386 doesn't understand the or accept the basic facts Fact A or Fact B
-333386 doesn't understand or accept that he has inadvertently made Luke's point
-everyone on GetBig suffers



The Luke  

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #88 on: March 18, 2010, 01:40:12 PM »
1.  You said I pulled the 40 k number out of my ass to start this debate - yes or no?   YES OR NO? 

2.  I posted 3  references for my claim - YES OR NO? 

So cry me a river with your semantic nonsense that you know full well you cant back up.   


Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #89 on: March 18, 2010, 01:40:37 PM »
So... Cliff Notes:
-Luke claims Fact A as something Palin-voters like 333386 wouldn't accept
-333386 doesn't accept Fact A and refutes Luke's claim with a citation showing unrelated Fact B (but also actually showing Fact A to be true)
-Luke explains the citation proves Fact A
-333386 claims Fact B is Fact A
-Luke explains fact B is not Fact A
-333386 pretends he never claimed Fact B, showing he doesn't even understand the difference between fact A and Fact B
-Luke explains that this is a perfect example of 333386 not understanding or accepting basic facts
-333386 doesn't understand the or accept the basic facts Fact A or Fact B
-333386 doesn't understand or accept that he has inadvertently made Luke's point
-everyone on GetBig suffers



The Luke  
lol  ;D

Poor, delusional Pea Brain.  :-\
!

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #90 on: March 18, 2010, 01:43:37 PM »
getting more popcorn, wait for me!!!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #91 on: March 18, 2010, 01:46:52 PM »
Oh, yeah, we have all been benefited by your post and runs kneepadding every idiotic thing this moronic admn has done Benny.   ::)  ::)

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #92 on: March 18, 2010, 01:56:32 PM »
You never mentioned anything about median income... you don't even understand the term.

I mentioned the US median income of $28,500 as an example of a commonly known fact that couldn't be mentioned on this board because morons would insist upon citations and references, then promptly dismiss such references if they were presented:
You, 333386, are just such a moron... and so you immediately attacked me:

I then pointed out that your post was a perfect example of the political illiteracy I was complaining about:
-you confused median household income with median income
-you confused median income of men working full-time year-round with median income
-you confused median income of women working full-time year-round with median income

...and you failed to notice that the very next sentence after the one YOU highlighted to refute (and "embarrass") me, in the article YOU cited, actually gave the median income for the US as $26,500.


But you still didn't understand, so you backtracked and claimed:
...but, as I've shown pretty clearly.
-you never said it.
-you never showed it
-and no it isn't


Why not simply admit you don't understand the difference between median and average...? (in fact you have a poor grasp of math and statistics)


Now you claim that I'm playing semantics... why? Because I made an unsupported claim, and YOU cited a reference that backed me up; but didn't understand the reference and didn't realise YOU actually made MY point.


So... Cliff Notes:
-Luke claims Fact A as something Palin-voters like 333386 wouldn't accept
-333386 doesn't accept Fact A and refutes Luke's claim with a citation showing unrelated Fact B (but also actually showing Fact A to be true)
-Luke explains the citation proves Fact A
-333386 claims Fact B is Fact A
-Luke explains fact B is not Fact A
-333386 pretends he never claimed Fact B, showing he doesn't even understand the difference between fact A and Fact B
-Luke explains that this is a perfect example of 333386 not understanding or accepting basic facts
-333386 doesn't understand the or accept the basic facts Fact A or Fact B
-333386 doesn't understand or accept that he has inadvertently made Luke's point
-everyone on GetBig suffers



The Luke  

This is more entertaining than an old Clint Eastwood flick!   :D :D :D

The Luke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3017
  • What's that in the bushes?
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #93 on: March 18, 2010, 01:57:12 PM »
1.  You said I pulled the 40 k number out of my ass to start this debate - yes or no?   YES OR NO? 

2.  I posted 3  references for my claim - YES OR NO? 

So cry me a river with your semantic nonsense that you know full well you cant back up.   

So far you have confused: median household income with median income; median income of fully insured men and women working full-time year-round with median income; gross income reported via tax returns with median income; average salary with median income; average per capita earning with average earnings/income; average income with median income; average salary with average income; average salary with median income and average with median.

Why should I explain anything to you...? You don't even understand why you are wrong.


The Luke

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #94 on: March 18, 2010, 02:01:32 PM »
So far you have confused: median household income with median income; median income of fully insured men and women working full-time year-round with median income; gross income reported via tax returns with median income; average salary with median income; average per capita earning with average earnings/income; average income with median income; average salary with average income; average salary with median income and average with median.

Why should I explain anything to you...? You don't even understand why you are wrong.


The Luke

I havn't confused shit.   You threw out your moronic claim that a I put out a number from thin air and I gave three references for the claim.  i never said it was median, mean, etc.  I said the average salary was 40k, which it is.     

You then chose to try to ascribe to me that I was claiming that my claim was that it was a median income figure involving NON-WORKING PEOPLE which I never did.

So, all I had to do was show that the number was not out of thin air which I did.  So you lose again fool. 


Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #95 on: March 18, 2010, 02:05:06 PM »
This is more entertaining than an old Clint Eastwood flick!   :D :D :D
It is entertaning watching 3333 handle this but no way it beats Clint Eastwood.  If Pale Rider, Unforgiven, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly or High Planes Drifter comes on tv, I'm out of here.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #96 on: March 18, 2010, 02:14:56 PM »
It is entertaning watching 3333 handle this but no way it beats Clint Eastwood.  If Pale Rider, Unforgiven, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly or High Planes Drifter comes on tv, I'm out of here.

Hugo - I find it entertaining as well.  After I am done with Luke - his stupid ass will run off for a month like last time.  When Skip chimes in tonight, it will be over for Luke once again.   

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #97 on: March 18, 2010, 02:19:38 PM »
Hugo - I find it entertaining as well.  After I am done with Luke - his stupid ass will run off for a month like last time.  When Skip chimes in tonight, it will be over for Luke once again.   

Isn't it hilarious that those who have JOBS, social lives and friends are considered by Pea Brain as "running away" from the boards?  ;D
!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #98 on: March 18, 2010, 02:23:53 PM »
Isn't it hilarious that those who have JOBS, social lives and friends are considered by Pea Brain as "running away" from the boards?  ;D

I made more today than you do in 6 months so bite me. 


Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: For everyone on the Politics Board - Where did Mons and Blacken go?
« Reply #99 on: March 18, 2010, 02:25:06 PM »
Isn't it hilarious that those who have JOBS, social lives and friends are considered by Pea Brain as "running away" from the boards?  ;D

Hey Benny, 333's inflatable girlfriend wants you to take back that statement! :D :D :D