Author Topic: Jay Cutler Really Doesnt' Have Anything on Nasser (Read 3862 times)

The_Hammer · « **on:** March 21, 2010, 12:57:35 AM »

From the front it's obvious that Nasser looks better, but from the back Nasser looks just as good if not better. Is this a testament of how good the 90's were when a second tier pro from that decade looks better then the champion today?

Wiggs · « **Reply #1 on:** March 21, 2010, 02:12:57 AM »

Actually he has 3 Olympias and 2 Arnold Classics and a couple million more on Nasser.

Anything else?

Meso_z · « **Reply #2 on:** March 21, 2010, 02:19:45 AM »

Quote from: Wiggs on March 21, 2010, 02:12:57 AM

Actually he has 3 Olympias and 2 Arnold Classics and a couple million more on Nasser.

Anything else?

Jay is living large. he has everything, body, money, wife, carreer. Nasser is just a nobody.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #3 on:** March 21, 2010, 02:29:01 AM »

check this thread i made long ago!!.. nasser's "weak" back is better than jay's back in the RLS and as we all know jay's back who was chosen by flex magazine as the 6th best back ever

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=233722.0

The_Hammer · « **Reply #4 on:** March 21, 2010, 02:44:35 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on March 21, 2010, 02:29:01 AM

check this thread i made long ago!!.. nasser's "weak" back is better than jay's back in the RLS and as we all know jay's back who was chosen by flex magazine as the 6th best back ever

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=233722.0

I don't like Nasser and I'm a fan of Jay because he's a good ambassador to bodybuilding, but you can't deny the facts.

Adder · « **Reply #5 on:** March 21, 2010, 03:08:09 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on March 21, 2010, 02:29:01 AM

check this thread i made long ago!!.. nasser's "weak" back is better than jay's back in the RLS and as we all know jay's back who was chosen by flex magazine as the 6th best back ever

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=233722.0

ahahaha 6th best back ever lmao who was no5 paul dillet?

tendonitis · « **Reply #6 on:** March 21, 2010, 05:31:11 AM »

Cutler is the most overreated bodybuilder in history. Everyone knows this.

Sharma · « **Reply #7 on:** March 21, 2010, 05:36:08 AM »

Jason was in the right place at the right time. He also stole an Arnold classic from Cormier but Jason is white, all American farm boy with blonde hair. That said he ironically did not win the Olympia the one time he actually did deserve it.

Then again, we all know by now that the best physique does not mean victory. Sometimes it doesn't even make top three.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #8 on:** March 21, 2010, 05:47:18 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on March 21, 2010, 02:29:01 AM

check this thread i made long ago!!.. nasser's "weak" back is better than jay's back in the RLS and as we all know jay's back who was chosen by flex magazine as the 6th best back ever

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=233722.0

LMFAO he's back is better than Jay in a rear lat spread that YOU scaled in two dimensions

no wonder why you guys think Nasser is so great

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #9 on:** March 21, 2010, 05:54:09 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on March 21, 2010, 05:47:18 AM

LMFAO he's back is better than Jay in a rear lat spread that YOU scaled in two dimensions no wonder why you guys think Nasser is so great

Are you saying this pics were chopped ND?

bigbobs · « **Reply #10 on:** March 21, 2010, 05:58:00 AM »

Quote from: The_Hammer on March 21, 2010, 12:57:35 AM

From the front it's obvious that Nasser looks better, but from the back Nasser looks just as good if not better. Is this a testament of how good the 90's were when a second tier pro from that decade looks better then the champion today?

Nasser did not look as bad "from the back" as people say - keep in mind that in both back poses the hamstrings and calves are part of it, to a lesser extent arms in the rear lat spread and to a large extend arms and delts in the rear double biceps pose, and again hamstrings and calves. Nasser was exceptional in these bodyparts.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:02:16 AM »

Quote from: bigbobs on March 21, 2010, 05:58:00 AM

Nasser did not look as bad "from the back" as people say - keep in mind that in both back poses the hamstrings and calves are part of it, to a lesser extent arms in the rear lat spread and to a large extend arms and delts in the rear double biceps pose, and again hamstrings and calves. Nasser was exceptional in these bodyparts.

No looks like SHIT from the back , the main focus is the back which is he is severely lacking in by his own admission to boot , all those parts connect to what? his back isn't pro caliber and it doesn't have proportionate size of a 285lb bodybuilder

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:04:43 AM »

The guy on the right is CONSIDERABLY lighter yet you'd never know , Nasser was no where near the force he was from the front when he turned around.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #13 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:06:33 AM »

Adder · « **Reply #14 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:11:27 AM »

Quote from: The_Hammer on March 21, 2010, 12:57:35 AM

From the front it's obvious that Nasser looks better, but from the back Nasser looks just as good if not better. Is this a testament of how good the 90's were when a second tier pro from that decade looks better then the champion today?

Looks like shit even ruhl have better back than nasser

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:21:04 AM »

Nasser weighs the most BY far yet men of similar height you'd never know from the back

kmhphoto · « **Reply #16 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:24:37 AM »

Quote from: The_Hammer on March 21, 2010, 12:57:35 AM

From the front it's obvious that Nasser looks better, but from the back Nasser looks just as good if not better. Is this a testament of how good the 90's were when a second tier pro from that decade looks better then the champion today?

If you're going to use a photo to support your argument you should use a better one than that.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #17 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:35:01 AM »

Quote from: kmhphoto on March 21, 2010, 06:24:37 AM

If you're going to use a photo to support your argument you should use a better one than that.

hahahahaha that's the best they could manage

Relentless · « **Reply #18 on:** March 21, 2010, 07:56:11 AM »

Nasser's back lacked the depth of the other top pros during his time: Cormier, Coleman, Ray, Wheeler, Taylor and even Levrone.

It's amazing he accomplished all that he did with a back lacking top-caliber detail.

calfzilla · « **Reply #19 on:** March 21, 2010, 08:30:07 AM »

Yes bbing peaked in the 90s. We all know that.

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #20 on:** March 21, 2010, 09:18:10 AM »

Nasser's back was terrible, soft and mushy.

You had to see it in person...it was god-awful and people laughed at him. You could hear him making grunting noises like a pig at the trough as he tried SO HARD to flex muscle he didn't have.

It was sad actually, to see someone so defeated.

#1 Klaus fan · « **Reply #21 on:** March 21, 2010, 09:29:50 AM »

Now Nasser is 2nd tier bodybuilder when he was infact 2nd at the Olympia one year.

SweetGeez · « **Reply #22 on:** March 21, 2010, 09:33:12 AM »

Quote from: Groink on March 21, 2010, 09:18:10 AM

Nasser's back was terrible, soft and mushy.

You had to see it in person...it was god-awful and people laughed at him. You could hear him making grunting noises like a pig at the trough as he tried SO HARD to flex muscle he didn't have.

It was sad actually, to see someone so defeated.

Poor Mr.(at least 3x)Oilympia... LOL!

JasonH · « **Reply #23 on:** March 21, 2010, 10:36:12 AM »

Does Nasser still compete or is he ever planning to again?

Matt C · « **Reply #24 on:** March 22, 2010, 03:55:02 PM »

Quote from: The_Hammer on March 21, 2010, 12:57:35 AM

From the front it's obvious that Nasser looks better, but from the back Nasser looks just as good if not better. Is this a testament of how good the 90's were when a second tier pro from that decade looks better then the champion today?

Nasser, second tier? Nasser may have relegated to second tier after the year 2000 but during his tenure in the nineties he was definitely first tier and one of the best bodybuilders to never win the Olympia. Say what you will Nasser but I think one should give credit where credit is due. As for Jay, I do think he is the overall better bodybuilder based on longevity and career success and so on, but Nasser at his best was in my opinion pretty close.