<yawn>
what does your response have to do with seeing the pros live?
yeah, sure. You got caught and now you're lying to weasel your way out. "Erm.... I meant to do that." 
wrong, you posted the opinions of a few journalists as 'proof' that Dorian had better conditioning or balance. Now that quotes came out saying Ronnie has better this or better that, it suddenly becomes "subjective opinion." You're just a sore loser who can't admit when he loses at his own game.
spare me the semantics. Show me where it says in the latest poll that Dorian is tied with Ronnie for #1. Until then, Flex magazine is on record for saying Ronnie has the best back of all-time. 
Best Back Ever
The 20 best backs of all time - Flex, March 2008
1. Ronnie Coleman (I don't see Dorian's name)
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_1_26/ai_n24356572/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1
brah, we've been through this many times. The fact you keep regurgitating the same nonsense proves you're grasping at straws. I have no problem admitting that Peter McGough is right, but not if you're going to be a fag who thinks the same rules of fairness don't apply to him. When you're ready to admit that Peter McGough is right about Ronnie having the best back ever and his 01 ASC physique beating every version of Dorian except pre-contest 93, then I will agree with Dorian having better conditioning.
you're dumb as f*ck. According to you, muscular bulk, conditioning, symmetry and balance - you know, the criteria judges use to determine placings - are objective yet when a bodybuilding expert applies this criteria, it magically become subjective? lol
what does your response have to do with seeing the pros live?
Because you have personally dismissed people who have seen Dorian & Ronnie live and in person as wrong , this makes you a hypocrite for claiming I do it , textbook projection
yeah, sure. You got caught and now you're lying to weasel your way out. "Erm.... I meant to do that."
oh no I was caught lying
I just told you how I felt you want to believe what you want , knock yourself out . I've always maintained in fact that Flex could give Dorian trouble and Ronnie is one of the few guys who could beat Dorian it's old news I've been consistent with that but you're looking for any angle
wrong, you posted the opinions of a few journalists as 'proof' that Dorian had better conditioning or balance. Now that quotes came out saying Ronnie has better this or better that, it suddenly becomes "subjective opinion." You're just a sore loser who can't admit when he loses at his own game.
I proved my points after the fact mind you on a non-subjective topic , either Ronnie has high sub-par calves in relation to his quads or he doesn't when directly compared to Dorian there is no room for debate on the subject
However the subject of best back or best ever is very subjective which why there are so many varying opinions and no one is right or wrong , so until you grasp this concept continue with your delusion that I lost at my own game when in fact the guy you claim who has the best back admits in 2003 a year you claim is his best that Dorian has the thickest & freakiest back he ever seen , so in the end you ' lose '
spare me the semantics. Show me where it says in the latest poll that Dorian is tied with Ronnie for #1. Until then, Flex magazine is on record for saying Ronnie has the best back of all-time.
Irony alert Neo saying spare me the semantics LMFAO I will just laugh at the absurdity of you typing that , I never claimed he was tied I said exactly what they said , a strong case for Dorian being #1 can be made and many still feel he has the best back , Flex magazine is on record as saying Joel Stubbs had a better back than Ronnie and Dorian , so guess what which is it? it changes with the writer and depends on the person , you're stuck on claiming a hallow victory on such a subjective topic and are so desperate think you've accomplished something and you haven't
Best Back Ever
The 20 best backs of all time - Flex, March 2008
1. Ronnie Coleman (I don't see Dorian's name)
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_1_26/ai_n24356572/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1
1 Ronnie Coleman
For much of the '90s, there was little dispute that Yates had the best back ever, and there are many who contend so today. Now, there is a debate, for during the first years of his Olympia reign, Coleman also displayed low-lying, ultrawide lats, but whereas Yates had more grainy ruggedness, Coleman had more feathered refinements. The moments just before he hit his rear lat spread and rear double biceps were contest highlights, as ridges and knots roamed and stripes and crevices emerged, morphing his back into a new and spectacular landscape each time he moved his arms. At his best, his back was like a great symphony orchestra, big and booming, sometimes overwhelming, and yet each finely tuned part played its role precisely.because you're not looking
try getting your head out of Ronnie's ass
brah, we've been through this many times. The fact you keep regurgitating the same nonsense proves you're grasping at straws. I have no problem admitting that Peter McGough is right, but not if you're going to be a fag who thinks the same rules of fairness don't apply to him. When you're ready to admit that Peter McGough is right about Ronnie having the best back ever and his 01 ASC physique beating every version of Dorian except pre-contest 93, then I will agree with Dorian having better conditioning.
I don't care what you agree with , the facts are facts regardless of your denial and ignorance , the point wasn't about the conditioning , but you knew this which is another pathetic attempt at deflection that was merely to highlight your hypocrisy
you're dumb as f*ck. According to you, muscular bulk, conditioning, symmetry and balance - you know, the criteria judges use to determine placings - are objective yet when a bodybuilding expert applies this criteria, it magically become subjective? lol
Still don't get it huh? ironic you call someone ' dumb as fuck ' who has the best bodypart is subjective , who was the best from two different eras is subjective , hence why there are so many different opinions , you being the biased person you are are trying to pass off your subjective popular opinion as fact and it's NOT how it works
Again Neo either Ronnie has short high underdeveloped calves when directly compared to Dorian Yates or he doesn't there is no room for debate on the topic , either Ronnie's quads dominate his calves in a manor in which Dorian's didn't or they do , there is no subjective opinion on this subject
See you know what subjective is and isn't but the whole crux of your position relies on popular and subjective opinions so you have to keep on this path of stupidity out of pride of not looking like you know what you're talking about , but don't fret you've already well established you don't eons ago when you claimed balance & proportion were the same things and I was merely typing they as separate to fluff up Dorian's advantages
It's obvious you don't have a fucking clue on what you're talking about , not on the subject of balance & proportion or density & dryness or on how contests are judged , you're in way over your head and committed to some very faulty positions and have been proven wrong , but again your foolish pride prevents you from learning which is why you continue to deny and rely on such faulty logic and appeals to the masses
You're like Hulkster in that regard to proud to admit you're obviously wrong and stupid to learn but then again I would too seeing after how many times I've corrected and embarrassed you
Thanks for playing Neo run along now Maser has grown tired of playing with his puppy
