AC 1997 (Nasser's Routine + Finals)!!..

[NarcissisticDeity]

so according to you all bb contests results are fair .. so to see franco with no legs and clear gyno winning the olympia it's fair.. and to see dorian with a deformed arm and a pregnant belly winning the olympia it's fair!!..

NO a Nasser winning in 1997 with ZERO back would be fair 

yes I think all contests are fair , learn how they're judged and come to the conclusion fixing a contest is highly improbable

[Palpatine Q]

NO a Nasser winning in 1997 with ZERO back would be fair 

yes I think all contests are fair , learn how they're judged and come to the conclusion fixing a contest is highly improbable

Yes  That is what i say...Nasser was more incomplete than anyone. his back was worse than peter putnams.

You can give him a slight edge in one or two contests against Doz from the front, but when Yates was on he more than held his own.....But from the Back every top guy in the last 20 years COMPLETELY OWNS him.

It was funny watching that clip because the announcer was saying really good stuff about Nasser until he turned around...then you could hear a pin drop, like the guy was just waiting for him to finish his back poses so he could start saying good things again.

[GroinkTropin]

No shit, Nasser was 280, Flex was 224, but he looked better and had better detail. Flex also won the Most Muscular Award as well. Hmmm, and in 1999 when Nasser won the AC, Kevin Levrone also won the Most Muscular Award, so you can't argue that it only goes to the winner of the AC.
it's more than the amount, it's he quality. For such a big dude, he lacked quality where it counts, his back detail. Now, why is that. Was he such a egomaniac that he thought only his size counted? Did he fall into the trap of quanity over quality? Even Flex fell into later on, it sometimes claims the best and most level headed bbers.

Nasser had no clue how to properly perform back exercises. He knew how to heave around heavy weights but contractions now that is a different story.

[bigbobs]

it's not considered like this at all!!.. shawn ray is one of the best and he won only 2 contests during his long career!!..

wow I didn't know that, and he entered more shows than Nasser so using ND's statistics he was very unsuccesful and had an unimpressive career lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

wow I didn't know that, and he entered more shows than Nasser so using ND's statistics he was very unsuccesful and had an unimpressive career lol

Can you learn to spell successful? you're just missing one letter lol it's bothering me now

you're damn right Shawn Ray's career was unimpressive 2 fucking wins if you're impressed with that you need to check out Levrone's career , oh wait you already know it 

Shawn was consistent throughout his career he gets credit for that and Nasser was pretty consistent for a time then he fell off the map

[Sherief Shalaby]

NO a Nasser winning in 1997 with ZERO back would be fair  

yes I think all contests are fair , learn how they're judged and come to the conclusion fixing a contest is highly improbable

aha so nasser winning the olympia with his back lacks some details would be unfair but dorian winning it with a totally deformed arm is fair!!..

you said before that you personally saw nasser better than dorian on that day!!..

i disagree with you because in a sport like bb it's IMPOSSIBLE for judges to be fair all the time even if they want!!.. it's a matter of taste after all and it's not a "1 + 1 = 2" sport!!.. fans cant just "amen" to any contest result all the time!!..

so according to you it was fair to place aron paker 12 or whatever in the olympia of 94!!.. and it was fair to place a guy like gunter 4th or so in 2005 or whatever!!..

you are a big asshole, now this is fair

[Sherief Shalaby]

Yes  That is what i say...Nasser was more incomplete than anyone. his back was worse than peter putnams.

You can give him a slight edge in one or two contests against Doz from the front, but when Yates was on he more than held his own.....But from the Back every top guy in the last 20 years COMPLETELY OWNS him.

It was funny watching that clip because the announcer was saying really good stuff about Nasser until he turned around...then you could hear a pin drop, like the guy was just waiting for him to finish his back poses so he could start saying good things again.

nasser's back was not deformed, it only lacked some details exactly the same as dorian's quads at mr. olympia 97, they were smooth and lacked details.. but sure dorian was more incomplete than all the others, it's just stupid to give the ultimate title of bodyBUILDING to a man with a totally DESTROYED arm!!.. see the irony!!..

[dr.chimps]

aha so nasser winning the olympia with his back lacks some details would be unfair but dorian winning it with a totally deformed arm is fair!!..

you said before that you personally saw nasser better than dorian on that day!!..

i disagree with you because in a sport like bb it's IMPOSSIBLE for judges to be fair all the time even if they want!!.. it's a matter of taste after all and it's not a "1 + 1 = 2" sport!!.. fans cant just "amen" to any contest result all the time!!..

so according to you it was fair to place aron paker 12 or whatever in the olympia of 94!!.. and it was fair to place a guy like gunter 4th or so in 2005 or whatever!!..

you are a big asshole, now this is fair

How old are you?

[Shockwave]

aha so nasser winning the olympia with his back lacks some details would be unfair but dorian winning it with a totally deformed arm is fair!!..

you said before that you personally saw nasser better than dorian on that day!!..

i disagree with you because in a sport like bb it's IMPOSSIBLE for judges to be fair all the time even if they want!!.. it's a matter of taste after all and it's not a "1 + 1 = 2" sport!!.. fans cant just "amen" to any contest result all the time!!..

so according to you it was fair to place aron paker 12 or whatever in the olympia of 94!!.. and it was fair to place a guy like gunter 4th or so in 2005 or whatever!!..

you are a big asshole, now this is fair

Lol.

Exactly. In a subjective sport, the only opinions that matter are those of the judges, since its their opinions that decided who is gonna win the shows.
So really, youre the asshole. lol.

[Sherief Shalaby]

How old are you?

12 why?

[dr.chimps]

12 why?

[PJim]

IMO, the back's musculature is so much more impressive when highly developed than the rest of the body that it can make or break a contest, even if said bodybuilder has a pretty decent front. Nasser not only had this problem, but he didn't seem good from the side either, his frame just doesn't look right from a lot of angles, I can't put my finger on why, but it doesn't flow.

[beefcakeblake]

IMO, the back's musculature is so much more impressive when highly developed than the rest of the body that it can make or break a contest, even if said bodybuilder has a pretty decent front. Nasser not only had this problem, but he didn't seem good from the side either, his frame just doesn't look right from a lot of angles, I can't put my finger on why, but it doesn't flow.

your right the dude looked like he was over 300 pounds from front then somehow from back he looked no more then 250, then the side of his body had a structural flaw with shallow shoulders, and flat back.

[Sherief Shalaby]

your right the dude looked like he was over 300 pounds from front then somehow from back he looked no more then 250, then the side of his body had a structural flaw with shallow shoulders, and flat back.

 

[Palpatine Q]

The important thing to remember is NASSER IS A COCK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[alnassak]

There is nothing in the world can justify Nasser’s second place on that contest. Although I am a huge flex wheeler fan, but Nassir clearly dwarfed him there.

Nasser of 1995 to early 1999, was, is and will be the best symmetrical mass monster with eye pleasing shape and lines. NO OTHER MASS MONSTER can come close.

 

[Sherief Shalaby]

The important thing to remember is NASSER IS A COCK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

this is only in case you are a pussy

[Sherief Shalaby]

There is nothing in the world can justify Nasser’s second place on that contest. Although I am a huge flex wheeler fan, but Nassir clearly dwarfed him there.

Nasser of 1995 to early 1999, was, is and will be the best symmetrical mass monster with eye pleasing shape and lines. NO OTHER MASS MONSTER can come close.

 

if there was no one called kevin levrone would you have joined team nasser??..

 

[alnassak]

if there was no one called kevin levrone would you have joined team nasser??..

 

 

Well, I am a more of shape and eye pleasing lines man, and honestly the last I thing I care about is HUGE MASS.

For me Quality over Quantity all the time, have a look at my updated top 6 bodybuilders ever, and you will know what I am taking about.

1-Kevin Levrone
2-Phil Heath
3-Shawn Ray
4-Flex Wheeler (pre Synthol)
5-Ahmed Haider
6-Chris Cormmeir.

 

[Parker]

There is nothing in the world can justify Nasser’s second place on that contest. Although I am a huge flex wheeler fan, but Nassir clearly dwarfed him there.

Nasser of 1995 to early 1999, was, is and will be the best symmetrical mass monster with eye pleasing shape and lines. NO OTHER MASS MONSTER can come close.

 

Dillett, was the more symmetrical mass monster---better shape, muscle size, muscle fullness-roundness. And Dorian himself said Dillett was a clear threat.

[alnassak]

Dillett, was the more symmetrical mass monster---better shape, muscle size, muscle fullness-roundness. And Dorian himself said Dillett was a clear threat.

Please read my full comments, I said Nasser is the best mass monster with symmetrical body and eye pleasing lines.

[Parker]

Please read my full comments, I said Nasser is the best mass monster with symmetrical body and eye pleasing lines.

Please read what I said, Dillett has the eye pleasing lines--far more so than Nasser.

[Sherief Shalaby]

Please read what I said, Dillett has the eye pleasing lines--far more so than Nasser.

   

[alnassak]

 

Outch 


Thanks for replying in my behalf 

[~UN_$ung~]

Please read what I said, Dillett has the eye pleasing lines--far more so than Nasser.

gotta disagree........there is NOTHING eye pleasing about paul dillet, not his looks, not his lines, not his posing, nothing

nasser owned dillet, and im not a particular fan of nasser