« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Phil Heath in Colmar  (Read 13773 times)

James Blunt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3272
Phil Heath in Colmar
« on: April 16, 2010, 10:37:21 AM »








Logged

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16993
  • MAGA
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2010, 10:49:43 AM »
Quote from: James Blunt on April 16, 2010, 10:37:21 AM


looks like 56 cm

meaning 22 inches exactly.
Logged

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2010, 10:51:01 AM »
Legit 22" arms, DAMN.
Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40888
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2010, 10:52:25 AM »
Quote from: Captain Equipoise on April 16, 2010, 10:51:01 AM
Legit 22" arms, DAMN.


Luke will disagree...He'll say they're 19...The tape is shady.. ::)
Logged
7

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16993
  • MAGA
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2010, 10:52:51 AM »
now when i look again it's 55 cm.

21,7 inches.
Logged

James Blunt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3272
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2010, 10:56:00 AM »
Quote from: Wiggs on April 16, 2010, 10:52:25 AM
Luke will disagree...He'll say they're 19...The tape is shady.. ::)
The Luke = Asshole.
Logged

CT_Muscle

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2644
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2010, 10:58:34 AM »
Berneika DWARFING Phil
Logged

ChristopherA

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7083
  • Getbig!
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2010, 11:08:17 AM »
Quote from: CT_Muscle on April 16, 2010, 10:58:34 AM
Berneika DWARFING Phil
More bf on Rob and looks like shit compared to Phil. Bigger arms but their shape isnt in his league
Logged

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #8 on: April 16, 2010, 11:12:07 AM »
Quote from: Wiggs on April 16, 2010, 10:52:25 AM
Luke will disagree...He'll say they're 19...The tape is shady.. ::)

 ::) oh brother...  ::)
Logged

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #9 on: April 16, 2010, 11:33:46 AM »
Damn - legit 22 inch arms. Shit like that makes you realise how far you've got to go.  :'(
Logged

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #10 on: April 16, 2010, 11:35:05 AM »
that first pic  :o
Logged

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2010, 11:36:50 AM »
Coleman's arms were 2 inches bigger in his prime.
Logged

lesaucer

  • Guest
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #12 on: April 16, 2010, 11:37:39 AM »
ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA ROBIRT BRINEIKA
Logged

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #13 on: April 16, 2010, 11:42:12 AM »
Quote from: Mr. Magoo on April 16, 2010, 11:35:05 AM
that first pic  :o

Yep - the shape of those arms look exactly like the NPC logo.  8)
Logged

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #14 on: April 16, 2010, 11:45:52 AM »
Quote from: James Blunt on April 16, 2010, 10:56:00 AM
The Luke = Asshole.

He really is a fool. He admits that Lee Priest's arms onstage are around 21", but after I post pics from the Olympia showing Ronnie's arms to be a couple of inches bigger, talked about misleading angles of pics and other BS and is now back to claiming that Ronnie's arms at their biggest were 21.7" when he weighed 310 lb ::)

Arguing with him is a fcuking waste of time.
Logged

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #15 on: April 16, 2010, 11:47:04 AM »
Quote from: #1 Klaus fan on April 16, 2010, 11:36:50 AM
Coleman's arms were 2 inches bigger in his prime.
They ain't got nothin' on Klaus
Logged

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2010, 11:48:14 AM »
who is that white mutant dwarfing heath?? heath has some of the biggest complete arms in the world but that white dude looks at least as big
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2010, 12:55:12 PM »
Quote from: BigBuehl on April 16, 2010, 11:08:17 AM
More bf on Rob and looks like shit compared to Phil. Bigger arms but their shape isnt in his league
Yep, and Sean Allen dwarfs both of the (using Sean, who is not pictured, as a reference), but they both don't have what Phil does, a pro card. Rob, after all the hype, couldn't deliver. And Rob has some odd shaped arms, in shape they lacked that highly detailed quality that Phil has, plus his phyisque is about as aesthetic as a block of ice---Rob=all hype.
Logged

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2010, 12:58:13 PM »
without dat synthol

Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40888
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2010, 02:46:01 PM »
Quote from: Swede! on April 16, 2010, 12:58:13 PM
without dat synthol



Please.... ::) Tell me you're joking... ::)
Phil is synthol free.
Logged
7

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3534
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2010, 04:49:21 PM »
boom!
Logged

Spike

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5876
  • Kill your ego
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2010, 05:17:34 PM »
Quote from: TRIX on April 16, 2010, 04:49:21 PM
boom!


I;m gettn some of those headphones - add some inches to my shizz :) ;) :D
Logged

MattT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2893
  • Sponsored by: PVL Sports Nutrition
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #22 on: April 16, 2010, 05:27:06 PM »
Phil Stayin very lean i see!
Logged

The Luke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3017
  • What's that in the bushes?
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #23 on: April 16, 2010, 06:00:50 PM »
Quote from: James Blunt on April 16, 2010, 10:37:21 AM


Wow!

56cm... which would be 54cm with a tight tape and a proper perpendicular measurement... but that's just nit-picking.

54cm = 21.2598 inches
55cm = 21.6535 inches
56cm = 22.0472 inches

...so assuming he's training arms and has a bit of a pump; let's give him the benefit of the doubt and allow him a legitimate 21.5'' cold arm.

Using the basic formula I posted:
((21.5'')2/(15)2)x150lbs = 308 lbs

...allowing for Phil being an inch or so shorter than average he should weigh 290-295 lbs in those pics.

Which would be 280-290 lbs allowing for his small frame (clavicle-wise; there is a cube relation between chest measurement and bodyweight)... which is probably exactly what he weighs in those pics.


Seems like all the guys claiming "Ronnie had 24'' arms"; "Levrone had 24'' arms"; "Arnie had 22'' arms" and criticising the basic math I used to calculate the guideline ratios in that other thread... well, it seems they all owe me an apology.

So, how about it? Anyone man enough to admit they were wrong?


The Luke
Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40888
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Phil Heath in Colmar
« Reply #24 on: April 16, 2010, 06:03:27 PM »
Quote from: The Luke on April 16, 2010, 06:00:50 PM
Wow!

56cm... which would be 54cm with a tight tape and a proper perpendicular measurement... but that's just nit-picking.

54cm = 21.2598 inches
55cm = 21.6535 inches
56cm = 22.0472 inches

...so assuming he's training arms and has a bit of a pump; let's give him the benefit of the doubt and allow him a legitimate 21.5'' cold arm.

Using the basic formula I posted:
((21.5'')2/(15)2)x150lbs = 308 lbs

...allowing for Phil being an inch or so shorter than average he should weigh 290-295 lbs in those pics.

Which would be 280-290 lbs alloing for his small frame (clavicle-wise; there is a cube relation beteen chest measurement and bodyweight)... which is probably exactly what he weighs in those pics.


Seems like all the guys claiming "Ronnie had 24'' arms"; "Levrone had 24'' arms"; "Arnie had 22'' arms" and criticising the basic math I used to calculate the guideline ratios in that other thread... ell, it seems they all owe me an apology.

So, how about it? Anyone man enoug to admit they were wrong?


The Luke


False...19 inches at best...the tape is shady and cleary skewed.
Logged
7
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »