Author Topic: FEDERAL Income TAXES on Middle-Income Families at Historically LOW Levels.  (Read 1492 times)

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.



http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3151&emailView=1



Federal Income Taxes on Middle-Income Families at Historically Low Levels

By Chuck Marr and Gillian Brunet
April 14, 2010




  Middle-income Americans are now paying federal taxes at or near historically low levels, according to the latest available data. That’s true whether it comes to their federal income taxes or their total federal taxes.
Income taxes: A family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum will pay only 4.6 percent of its income in federal income taxes this year, according to a new analysis by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center. This is the second-lowest percentage in the past 50 years.
 Overall federal taxes: Middle-income households are paying overall federal taxes — which include income as well as payroll and excise taxes — at or near their lowest levels in decades, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).



Federal Income Taxes Have Declined Significantly in Recent Decades

Federal income taxes on middle-income families have declined significantly in recent decades (see Figure 1).
In 2000, the year before the 2001 tax cut that President Bush and Congress enacted, the median-income family of four paid 8.0 percent of its income in individual income taxes, according to Tax Policy Center estimates — a smaller share than in any year since 1967 (except for 1998 and 1999). [1] The Bush tax cuts further reduced middle-income tax obligations.
This year, the Making Work Pay tax credit, which President Obama and Congress enacted as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, is providing a credit of $800 to married joint filers ($400 to single filers). A median-income family with two children thus will receive an $800 tax cut in the return it files this year.
With the new tax cut, the median family’s federal income taxes will equal just 4.6 percent of its income in 2009. That is lower than in any year since 1955 (the first year for which these data are available) except for 2008, when another stimulus-related tax cut was in effect.
The 4.6 percent effective tax rate — the percentage of its income that a family pays in taxes — is well below the 15 percent marginal tax rate that a family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum faces. Typically, such a family reduces its effective tax rate by taking the standard deduction (or, in some cases, itemized deductions), personal exemptions, and tax credits such as the child tax credit. The Making Work Pay tax credit further reduces that family’s effective tax rate.

Overall Federal Taxes Also at Low Levels
The decline in income taxes on middle-class households in recent years has driven a decline in these households’ overall federal taxes.
Households in the middle fifth of the income spectrum paid an average of 14.2 percent of their income in overall federal taxes in 2006, the latest year for which data are available, according to CBO.[2] This is just slightly above this group’s effective tax rate of 13.8 percent in 2003, which was the lowest level since at least 1979.
Most Americans pay more in payroll taxes, which support Social Security and Medicare, than they do in income taxes. Thus, the 14.2 percent figure reflects the impact of payroll taxes far more than income taxes.
Due to the impact of the recession and the temporary tax cuts in the Recovery Act, particularly the Making Work Pay tax credit, CBO data for 2009 (when they become available) will likely show that middle-income families faced significantly lower effective overall federal tax rates than in 2006.


End Notes:
[1] Tax Policy Center, “Historical Federal Income Tax Rates for a Family of Four,” April 12, 2010. The Tax Policy Center’s estimates were derived by updating (using Treasury’s methodology) a 1998 Treasury Department analysis that examined changes since 1955 in the percentage of income that the median-income family of four pays in federal income taxes.
[2] The CBO study covers the 1979-2006 period and includes federal income, payroll, and excise taxes. Congressional Budget Office, “Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates, 1979-2006,” April 2009.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
TA - this does not take into account so much else and you know it. 

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
TA - this does not take into account so much else and you know it. 
Orly?

Face it, the Tea Partiers and those that support their "Federal Tax Grievance" are pretty much misinformed.

My favorite part is the Ronald Reagan effect.  The man literally put a stranglehold on the middle class, yet the Confederacy of Dunces that are the Tea Partiers as well as the Republican party revere him as some sort of Tax Saint.

They also conveniently forgot that he wanted to dismantle all Nuclear Weapons. Oh the Right Wing certainly has self-deluded amnesia.  I love it.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Orly?

Face it, the Tea Partiers and those that support their "Federal Tax Grievance" are pretty much misinformed.

My favorite part is the Ronald Reagan effect.  The man literally put a stranglehold on the middle class, yet the Confederacy of Dunces that are the Tea Partiers as well as the Republican party revere him as some sort of Tax Saint.

They also conveniently forgot that he wanted to dismantle all Nuclear Weapons. Oh the Right Wing certainly has self-deluded amnesia.  I love it.

 ::) 


As a trust fund child who does not work a serious job, you are utterly clueless.  It is the total tax bite, not just Federal Income taxes. 

FICA
Energy Taxes
Sin Taxes
Sales Taxes
Registration and "use" taxes

Etc Etc Etc. 

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
First off the tea party movement of today isnt simply about tax rates they are about more fiscal responsibility...govt spending etc...

and if you think that the govt spending that has been taking place wont lead to historically HIGH LEVELS of tax rates your a bigger idiot than I thought you were... ;)

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
::) 


As a trust fund child who does not work a serious job, you are utterly clueless.  It is the total tax bite, not just Federal Income taxes. 

FICA
Energy Taxes
Sin Taxes
Sales Taxes
Registration and "use" taxes

Etc Etc Etc. 
Sounds like you should be directing your anger at the State and Local Government.  I wasn`t aware of a National Sales, Sin and National Registration taxes.  

Why is your "anger" in the totally wrong place?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Sounds like you should be directing your anger at the State and Local Government.  I wasn`t aware of a National Sales, Sin and National Registration taxes.  

Why is your "anger" in the totally wrong place?

The state govt does not have the power to devalue the dollar.

The Statwe govt, especially, NYS is at criminal levels of spending and needs to be chopped in half. 

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
First off the tea party movement of today isnt simply about tax rates they are about more fiscal responsibility...govt spending etc...

and if you think that the govt spending that has been taking place wont lead to historically HIGH LEVELS of tax rates your a bigger idiot than I thought you were... ;)
The overwhelming majority of taxes  go to the Military and the Military Industrial Complex.  This is also where the overwhelming majority of spending comes from.

Where are the Tea Party signs that read, "SHRINK THE MILITARY", or "STOP BUYING BOMBS"?

There is no evidence whatsoever that the current spending or budget will lead to a higher tax rate in the future.  The Federal Tax trend clearly predicts the opposite of what you are claiming.  Where is your evidence?

Please refrain from the constant and dull "you are an idiot" comment.  It does nothing to further your misinformed points of view.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
The overwhelming majority of taxes  go to the Military and the Military Industrial Complex.  This is also where the overwhelming majority of spending comes from.

Where are the Tea Party signs that read, "SHRINK THE MILITARY", or "STOP BUYING BOMBS"?

There is no evidence whatsoever that the current spending or budget will lead to a higher tax rate in the future.  The Federal Tax trend clearly predicts the opposite of what you are claiming.  Where is your evidence?

Please refrain from the constant and dull "you are an idiot" comment.  It does nothing to further your misinformed points of view.

Its impossible because you are an idiot and a moron.   How else do you think we can deal with 1.5 Trillion Dollar deficits? 

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
The overwhelming majority of taxes  go to the Military and the Military Industrial Complex.  This is also where the overwhelming majority of spending comes from.

Where are the Tea Party signs that read, "SHRINK THE MILITARY", or "STOP BUYING BOMBS"?

There is no evidence whatsoever that the current spending or budget will lead to a higher tax rate in the future.  The Federal Tax trend clearly predicts the opposite of what you are claiming.  Where is your evidence?

Please refrain from the constant and dull "you are an idiot" comment.  It does nothing to further your misinformed points of view.
LOL where do you think we are going to get the money from? it will have to paid somehow...


BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Well,since Obama hasnt dropped federal rates one penny Im not sure if the credit goes to him.Second of all, the idea that the tea parties are simply anti-tax is stupid and simple minded.They are protesting the purposeful take over of the private sector by government.Things like pay czars,the bailouts of the auto industry,the health care industry,taxing foods so they can dictate what we eat,taxing tanning booths,dictating what kind of cars we drive etc etc.

To simplify it as just anti-tax is silly.Obamas newest scheme,financial reform is just another example.This will allow Obama and Geitner to decide which companies should survive and which should be taken over.It never ends.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
LOL where do you think we are going to get the money from? it will have to paid somehow...



Its called being a deluded liberal dolt who thinks the stork drops dollars down from the sky to fund cradle to grave govt.  

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
LOL where do you think we are going to get the money from? it will have to paid somehow...



Single Payer National Healthcare, Military Reduction, Energy Independence, Incentives for American Exports.  Plenty of ways.

Just for your reference, There has been only one President that has ever paid the Entire National Debt, Andrew Jackson.  That is because he started the Bank Wars.  Look it up.

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
TA come on, enough with the logic these guys just don't get it, 333 after all has read economics 101.  He is now smarter than any economist who ever deviates from what he views as sound economics, he is smarter than all of them.  According to him FDR deepened the depression and some UCLA minority  ::)
Abandon every hope...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
TA come on, enough with the logic these guys just don't get it, 333 after all has read economics 101.  He is now smarter than any economist who ever deviates from what he views as sound economics, he is smarter than all of them.  According to him FDR deepened the depression and some UCLA minority  ::)

 ::)  ::)

Please tell me when the Great Depression ended. 

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Single Payer National Healthcare, Military Reduction, Energy Independence, Incentives for American Exports.  Plenty of ways.

Just for your reference, There has been only one President that has ever paid the Entire National Debt, Andrew Jackson.  That is because he started the Bank Wars.  Look it up.
LOL that doesnt address the problem...the spending is simply a symptom of the problem...reduce the size of the govt and its endevours and the amount of money needed to fund it will decrease.

you really think that the govt is going to reduce their spending in one area and not increase it in another?

Im not worried about paying the entire national debt it would be nice to not add to it for a start

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
::)  ::)

Please tell me when the Great Depression ended. 

Please explain why and how he worsened it?  Please 333 explain what exactly a massive majority of economists since then have missed.  This has become a bullsh8t republican talking point you'll of course post that laughable UCLA study and it is in fact laughed at by other economists.  It's only gained legs because GOP wants to rewrite history and claim Obama worsened the recession once we pull out of it. 
Abandon every hope...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Please explain why and how he worsened it?  Please 333 explain what exactly a massive majority of economists since then have missed.  This has become a bullsh8t republican talking point you'll of course post that laughable UCLA study and it is in fact laughed at by other economists.  It's only gained legs because GOP wants to rewrite history and claim Obama worsened the recession once we pull out of it. 

The stats dont lie KC on this. 

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Federal taxes aren't the problem this year (though they go up next year for upper middle and high income earners and anyone who owns a piece of a business), it's the astronomical amount of spending which will lead to tax discussions like we are now seeing.
TA, you're right, the taxes that have gone up are at the state and local levels...but its a reaction to widespread budget deficits, overspending and job loss. Plus people only want so much government control of things and if left unchecked, this administration would make an even bigger power grab and redistribution.

The federal budgetary deficits are unsustainable and there are only two ways to manage it: cut spending and/or raise taxes.  Obama has a 1.4 trillion dollar deficit (vs Bush's 453 billion dollar deficit) and projected deficits for at least the next 7 yrs.  We need to cut spending across the board (including military) and restrain the size of government.  Adding 16,000 new IRS agents, underestimating the true cost of this healthcare program, continuing astronomical military expenses, increasing international aid & UN financial support, raising unemployment taxes and capital gains taxes and passing costly programs like cap & trade are not steps in the right direction.

TA, even though I agree on the military budget, it's actually SS, medicare/medicaid and other government entitlements that make up the largest block of spending.

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
I think some of us are upset with Obama because he could have done a lot more to help small business but he chose to bail out large industry, banks (yes with Bush), and create loads of new government jobs with the stimulus.  They could have also repealed NAFTA and lowered corporate tax rates which could have opened the gates to big companies relocating in the US. 
Just seems like they choose nearly all big government solutions.  Big government controlled entities are slow and inefficient for the most part.  There needs to be a better middle road.  Allowing the free market to work but protecting the people/consumers against unfair practices and monopolies.