Author Topic: Waxman sneaks anti-Vitamin & Supplements amendment into Wall Street Reform Bill  (Read 571 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Congressman Waxman sneaks anti-vitamin amendment into Wall Street reform bill
Natural News ^ | Mike Adams

Posted on Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:31:43 AM by truthfinder9


Mike Adams Natural News April 30, 2010

Of all the sneaky tactics practiced in Washington D.C., this recent action by Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) is one of the most insidious: While no one was looking, he injected amendment language into the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 (H.R. 4173) that would expand the powers of the FTC (not the FDA, but the FTC) to terrorize nutritional supplement companies by greatly expanding the power of the FTC to make its own laws that target dietary supplement companies.

Congressman Henry Waxman wants to give the FTC even more powers by allowing the FTC to write its own laws without Congressional approval.

This is a little-known secret about the FTC and the nutritional supplements business: The FTC routinely targets nutritional supplement companies that are merely telling the truth about their products. Some companies are threatened by merely linking to published scientific studies about their products.

For example, here’s an important article that describes how to FDA criminally extorts money out of supplement companies: http://www.naturalnews.com/024567_health_the_FDA_websites.html .

The FTC does much the same thing. They target a particular company that’s having success in the natural products marketplace, then they accuse that company of “inferring” that their products have some health benefit. From there, the FTC demands that the company engage in paying a massive fine to the FTC, which the FTC calls “consumer redress” even though none of the money actually goes to the consumers.

If you try to fight the FTC, they haul you into their own special “FTC courts” which are not public courts where you have the benefit of a jury, but rather they are courts where the judges are actually FTC employees and you have no rights. You are essentially guilty until proven innocent, and virtually no one has been found innocent by the FTC.

If the King says you’re guilty, then you’re guilty

The FTC also forces you to sign a “consent decree” which involves you admitting to committing crimes that you have actually never committed. These crimes include the “criminal misrepresentation of a product” by, for example, explaining that walnuts help support healthy cholesterol levels or that cherries ease symptoms of inflammation.

Using these methods, the FTC has extorted tens of millions of dollars out of nutritional supplement companies. More importantly, it has terrorized the industry and put several companies out of business, denying the American public access to products that could improve their health and prevent disease.

Waxman wants the FTC to have even more power over your vitamins

Now Congressman Henry Waxman wants to give the FTC even more powers by allowing the FTC to write its own laws without Congressional approval. This would allow a rogue agency to simply invent any new law it wants, such as requiring nutritional supplement companies to spend hundreds of millions of dollars “proving” the efficacy of a vitamin before they can sell it.

This will allow the FTC to utterly circumvent DSHEA — the law passed in 1994 that provides basic protections to vitamin and supplement manufacturers. This will result in an FTC war on vitamins and supplements that would no doubt see this rogue agency attempting to destroy the entire industry and imprison the founders and executives of all the top supplement manufacturers.

This is how bad things have become in America today: The criminal CEOs of drug companies are allowed to commit felony crimes, engage in routine price fixing fraud and fix their research with fraudulent clinical trials, yet the FTC and FDA do nothing. But when an honest nutritional supplement company says something like, “Walnuts are good for your heart,” they get threatened with imprisonment or have their entire life savings stolen away from them by the FTC through a series of “fines.”

NaturalNews.com and the Alliance for Natural Health are protesting this deceptive action by Henry Waxman — a lifelong opponent of natural medicine who is trying to covertly inject this expansion of FTC powers into the Finance Reform Bill.

This petition is being organized by the Alliance for Natural Health (http://www.anh-usa.org), a health freedom organization we strongly support here at NaturalNews.

The FTC is already a loose cannon. We don’t want to now hand it nuclear weapons that could destroy the entire industry.

Protect your health freedoms or you will lose them! The U.S. Congress is literally just one vote away from granting the FTC dangerous new powers to destroy the natural products industry. A vote could take place as early as this weekend.

Attorney Jonathan Emord had this to say about this issue:

“The provision removing the ban on FTC rulemaking without Congressional preapproval contained in H.R. 4173 invites the very same irresponsible over-regulation of the commercial marketplace that led Congress to enact the ban in the 1980s. FTC has no shortage of power to regulate deceptive advertising; this bill gives it far more discretionary power than it needs, inviting greater abuse and mischief from an agency that suffers virtually no check on its discretion.”

You need to see this video I interviewed Jonathan Emord recently at the Health Freedom Expo in California. Watch Jonathan talk about global censorship of health freedom in the YouTube interview.

I know the audio quality is a little poor (we were at the Health Freedom Expo, and there’s a lot of background noise), but Jonathan Emord’s words are so important for you to hear that I wanted to share this video with you anyway.

Jonathan Emord is also the author of an important new book called Global Censorship of Health Information. The book exposes the truth behind what Emord calls state-sponsored drug monopolies.


________________________ ____

Another moron who needs to retire and go away. 

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244

Another moron who needs to retire and go away. 




To which moron do you refer? Congressman Waxman, the man who wrote the article, ...or YOU for posting it without having a clue as to whether or not it is accurate? Do you do any sort of homework on the crap that you post? At least do a little checking before you post misleading stuff. Aren't you sick of being embarrassed with egg all over your face?

for those who want to know the truth, here it is. First  it was John McCain's "Dietary Supplement Safety Act". Supposedly, this act would have given the FDA authority to unilaterally ban any dietary supplement, or all dietary supplements. A month later, after objections from the supplement industry and discussions with others, such as Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Senator McCain withdrew his support of the act.

Now we have Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) allegedly embedding language in "The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009" (H.R. 4173) that will give unchecked power to the FTC (not FDA) to ban any, or taken to its illogical extreme, all dietary supplements. According to the same two or three articles that have went viral throughout cyberspace (creating the illusion there are thousands of opposing commentaries) Waxman added this last minute language, after the bill had already passed the House and was about to go before the Senate, to "terrorize nutritional supplement companies by greatly expanding the power of the FTC to make its own laws that target dietary supplement companies". Here's the problem with this one: It doesn't.

I've searched the original version of this bill (all 1,279 pages) as well as the bill currently before the Senate (all 1,705 pages). You can find both HERE. There is not one word related to dietary supplements, nutritional products, DSHEA, or the word "Health" in any context (other than where Federal Employee Health Benefits is mentioned). Here's what's going on...

Waxman did add language to the already House approved bill, but the language is designed to give the FTC more power by essentially allowing it to write its own laws without Congressional approval. Presumably this is to allow the FTC to act more swiftly when they find evidence of corporate malfeasance (related to "Wall Street"). It appears that only two or three bloggers and op-ed authors within the dietary supplement arena have extrapolated from this that the FTC could use this new found power to regulate without oversight the dietary supplement industry as well. They even go so far as to claim that Waxman's motive for this added language is specifically to that end. Most commentary is titled "Health freedom alert: Congressman Waxman sneaks anti-vitamin amendment into Wall Street reform bill", or words to that effect.

I forgot to mention, the word "vitamin" also doesn't appear anywhere in the revised bill.

So yes, technically, the power to enact law without Congressional approval would give the FTC the power to ban any or all dietary supplements, because it allegedly gives the FTC the power to ban practically anything! But, in fact, there is not one word anywhere in the bill that even remotely has to do with specifically dietary supplements, or the health and nutrition industry in general. It appears that paranoid conspiracy theorists are assuming this is the real reason Waxman added this language. Their evidence? In the past Waxman has called for additional oversight of dietary supplements by the FDA (see HERE). Along with dozens of other politicians over the past several years.

There's one other thing to consider here... The FTC already has the power to essentially create law without Congressional approval! That's precisely what the New Business Opportunity Rule will do (as far as to whomever it eventually applies to). Right now the FTC requires dietary supplement marketers to "scientifically substantiate" their claims. They can change their standards to meet this requirement at any time, and without congressional approval (although still a lengthy process).

Having said all of that, the practice of sneaking in last minute language to enact a law that has nothing what-so-ever to do with the bill being considered is an abhorrent and not uncommon practice. The ability for the FTC to enact regulations that are, for all intents and purposes, the creation of law, without Congressional approval, is also worthy of your concern and disdain. But you all should already be objecting to this, because its already happening, and has been for decades! So when you see all of those email pleas and blogger links sending you to petitions, or informing you how to protest to your representative, absolutely do it. But protest the right thing, for the right reason. The FTC already has enough unilateral power, and no significant revisions, under any circumstance, should be made to a bill that's already passed the House and is now before the Senate. That's what you should be protesting.
w

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
The article you posted confirmed mine.  Do screw off scammer.

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Just what we need more government idiots trying to control what we eat and use as supplements.Little tiny dwarf Henry Waxman,the rat looking piece of shit with his teeth a mess,is going to dictate to people what vitamins they can use[he wont but wants government to]because he is the picture of health and government knows best.I wish this little girl would choke to death on his buck teeth.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Definately the worst looking in the house. 

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
The article you posted confirmed mine.  Do screw off scammer.

Maybe you should re-read what I posted... slowly this time.
And actually read it... not skim it as you are prone to do.

...or even better yet, read the actual bill as I have. I've included a link.
w