Author Topic: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia  (Read 23636 times)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #25 on: May 12, 2010, 09:21:00 AM »
so according to cock-sucker-wave if dorian's right arm was deformed too it would still not be an issue!!..

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #26 on: May 12, 2010, 09:26:25 AM »
Nasser destroyed yates that year and could easily have won
why should a bbing contest be won only from the back
he dominated yates badly everywhere else
so Dorian won from the back
but Nasser destroyed him from the side and front.. Yet Dorian wins ha ha you have to love bbing judging

Thanks meso - I've previously posted that you're a Nasser hater but I take that back :)

And yes SS the Dorian fans almost always only post back shots, also when comparing to Ronnie  ::)  They also ignore other bodyparts taht are visible in the back shots like arms, delts, legs.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #27 on: May 12, 2010, 09:35:59 AM »
I was only kidding about his training effort but I think my other point is valid....The knock on Nasser was his back, glute and ham development and dryness.....and he never once came onstage with any notable improvement....it was always the same old Nasser in the judges eyes

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #28 on: May 12, 2010, 09:37:30 AM »
??? ::) ::) :-X
hey I don't agree with it but no where inthe criteria is muscle shape mentioned.
And it's been shown time and time again that judges look at size and conditioning over everything else. Sad but true.

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #29 on: May 12, 2010, 09:42:23 AM »
LOL at how Dorian fans always refer to him as the greatest ever,because he dominated the 90-s,the decade with the greatest competitors,yet when it comes to 94 and 97(his worst years) they always explain his "wins"with a weak competition.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #30 on: May 12, 2010, 09:46:24 AM »
so according to cock-sucker-wave if dorian's right arm was deformed too it would still not be an issue!!..
lol sounds like someone is sensitive his hero had no back.
Hey I've said I think Nasser should have won that o. But I can see why he didn't. Doesn't mean I agree with it, but that's how the judges judge. Size and conditioning, and the back is of high priority. Don't be pissy cause your hero didn't show up with what the judges wanted to see. Lol

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #31 on: May 12, 2010, 09:54:46 AM »
LOL at how Dorian fans always refer to him as the greatest ever,because he dominated the 90-s,the decade with the greatest competitors,yet when it comes to 94 and 97(his worst years) they always explain his "wins"with a weak competition.
where do you see me arguing why I agreed with him winning? I think Nasser looks better. I'm explaining why the judges gave him the win. It's because they like size and condiioning with a huge back. Agree or disagree doesn't matter that's the way it is.

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #32 on: May 12, 2010, 09:58:56 AM »
hey I don't agree with it but no where inthe criteria is muscle shape mentioned.
And it's been shown time and time again that judges look at size and conditioning over everything else. Sad but true.
According to Jim Manion(chairman of the IFBB Pro Division):"Distended abdomens and distorted muscles negatively impact upon symmetry and natural aesthetics and,therefore,detract from the overall physique."

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #33 on: May 12, 2010, 10:06:28 AM »
where do you see me arguing why I agreed with him winning? I think Nasser looks better. I'm explaining why the judges gave him the win. It's because they like size and condiioning with a huge back. Agree or disagree doesn't matter that's the way it is.
I was just speaking generally,but since you recognized yourself...
Don't get me wrong,I respect Dorian's personality much more than Nasser's,but Nasser just looked better on that particular day,I agree with you.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #34 on: May 12, 2010, 12:17:34 PM »
Nasser destroyed Dorian
I would like for someone to show me where it is written in stone that a bbing contest should be won from the back... This just proves the fallacy of bbing judging
to anyone with comon sense and functioning eyes
Nasser beat Dorian in more areas than Dorian beat him
Nasser was robbed Dorian is a basically FUX with a amazing back
UGLY PHYSIQUE
I still want to know why a bbing contest hast to be won from the back even and not the front
 ???
choice is an illusion

EL Mariachi

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6019
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #35 on: May 12, 2010, 12:22:25 PM »
i like the powerful look on nasser back and front, he makes everyone look flat, but it looks like nasser won in 1997, that fdb of yates cant be overlooked.

JP_RC

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #36 on: May 12, 2010, 05:38:34 PM »
Lol. Where did I ever state I thought yates should win? Personally I think Nasser looked better in 97. But I understand why they went with yates. Small arms vs NO back. Muscle shape isn't really judges according to the criteria, so thE deformed arm wasn't really an issue. If Nasser had anything. Lose to a back he would and should have won.

Symmetry is part of the judging criteria and a smaller arm/arms would also have a negative impact on proportions.


Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #37 on: May 12, 2010, 05:45:06 PM »
At least Yates had one good arm.

Nasser had NO back.... And soggy glutes and hams

The Mr O is a conditioned mass game. Nasser lacked this, he was never as dry as Yates....not even close.  No one his size ever has been

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16142
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #38 on: May 12, 2010, 05:50:53 PM »
Nassers conditioning is piss poor. No delt striations, no vascularity, no nothing. That's how some pros look in the Off-Season.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83373
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #39 on: May 12, 2010, 06:22:11 PM »
At least Yates had one good arm.

Nasser had NO back.... And soggy glutes and hams

The Mr O is a conditioned mass game. Nasser lacked this, he was never as dry as Yates....not even close.  No one his size ever has been

yeah but none of that matters , all that matters is if he didn't have any torn muscles and they were ' bigger ' albeit softer

they can have 1997 it means what in the scheme of things? Nasser beat a career worse Dorian? Yipppppeeeeee Nasser couldn't touch Yates at his best so they can win this battle and Dorian still wins the war

musclepost

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #40 on: May 12, 2010, 06:48:30 PM »
It's simple!!

No striated glutes = NO sandow.

Now get pumping those buns, studs!

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #41 on: May 12, 2010, 07:46:49 PM »
the only reason Nasser lost the 1996 and 97 olympias were because of the corrupt IFBB judges and politics.

Yates was installed as the white -anglo poster boy, it was what mcgough, demilia, weinberger and manion wanted.

Olympia outcomes are all predetermined by what Manion/demilia formerly wants. THAT IS THE TRUTH

Nasser beats dorian easily bests Dorian in every pose except the RDB, even in the RLS Nasser is clearly better than yates

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #42 on: May 12, 2010, 08:44:23 PM »
I was only kidding about his training effort but I think my other point is valid....The knock on Nasser was his back, glute and ham development and dryness.....and he never once came onstage with any notable improvement....it was always the same old Nasser in the judges eyes

hey big man you always say this after every time i expose your ignorance ;)

"i was only kidding"..."i was just messing with you shareef"  :-X

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #43 on: May 12, 2010, 08:52:04 PM »
Nassers conditioning is piss poor. No delt striations, no vascularity, no nothing. That's how some pros look in the Off-Season.



ok but could you plz help me to see dorian's delt striation!!.. dorian's shoulders were very poor in comparsion to any of the other top pros in his time even in 1995!!..

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #44 on: May 12, 2010, 08:52:31 PM »
+he was a fat ass lol :-X
Kinda ironic, he said that about Flex, lol!

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #45 on: May 12, 2010, 08:55:55 PM »
Shawn destroyed Dorian
I would like for someone to show me where it is written in stone that a bbing contest should be won from the back... This just proves the fallacy of bbing judging
to anyone with comon sense and functioning eyes
Shawn beat Dorian in more areas than Dorian beat him
Shawn was robbed Dorian is a basically FUX with a amazing back
UGLY PHYSIQUE
I still want to know why a bbing contest hast to be won from the back even and not the front
 ???
fixed

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #46 on: May 12, 2010, 08:57:09 PM »
At least Yates had one good arm.

Nasser had NO back.... And soggy glutes and hams

The Mr O is a conditioned mass game. Nasser lacked this, he was never as dry as Yates....not even close.  No one his size ever has been

nasser's hams were GREAT, shape wise and size wise.. they went in a good way with his amazing quads!!..

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #47 on: May 12, 2010, 09:07:58 PM »
even at his very best in 95 dorian couldnt come close to nasser (who was not at his best) from the front!!.. nasser owns him badly in everything  especially in the quads area!!

Topskin69

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1965
  • Deshay with the gauge, Vanilla with the nine.
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #48 on: May 12, 2010, 09:48:43 PM »
I hate to say this, but Dorian's Gut in 97 was completely out of hand. It looked like it was about to spill over into the 3rd row.  :-[

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: The ONLY reason Nasser lost the 97 Olympia
« Reply #49 on: May 13, 2010, 12:11:02 AM »
Yates received the most gift wins of any Mr O winner

true winners should have been

93 FLex
94 Shawn
95 Nasser or KEvin
96 Nasser
97 Nasser

truly Yates was in the right place @ the right time

those who think he was such a great , complete dominant BB are deluded