Beck and Palin speak at NRA- Attack Obama for going after our guns

[tonymctones]

actually, if any part of the official story doesn't hold up, then the whole "official story" theory should be revisited.

I agree with Palin that we need another 911 investigation.  You go ahead and believe
what you want here.  

Actually, the 911 commissioners want another investigation as well and call theirs very incomplete.  if you want to defend a turd even the authors wont defend, by all means, haev fun lol...

We have all said we would like to see another investigation...you cite the 9/11 investigation even though that basically kills your missle hit the pentegon CT...

[240 is Back]

tony,

at this point you have very poor information and very weak background.  Honestly, I could argue the official story better than you at this point.

Learn more before making your judgment.  I was an ass to believe the official story and I tried to start a fight with a guy who was a traitor enough to say 'inside job'.  It took me a year of research to reverse my thinking.  But it wasn't until I put my idiot ego aside and admitted "hey, maybe i dont know shit about this topic' that I was able to look at it objectively.

You've believed the official story from minute 1, right?  No amount of arguing from anyone will chnage that.  You have to step back, and say "okay, let's watch a few hours of an opposing viewpoint, and see what they're so riled up about".

You watch loose change 3, as an intro, without interruption, and you come back and you tell me the official story is 100% correct, and that you still agree with it.   No, you'll assume it's already been debunked (LC3 has not) and you will cite some website you found.  That's cool.  Carry on

[Soul Crusher]

actually, if any part of the official story doesn't hold up, then the whole "official story" theory should be revisited.

I agree with Palin that we need another 911 investigation.  You go ahead and believe
what you want here.  

Actually, the 911 commissioners want another investigation as well and call theirs very incomplete.  if you want to defend a turd even the authors wont defend, by all means, haev fun lol...

They want an investigation to examine the incompentence of the govt in not preventing it, no one is claiming that missles or holograms and CIA demo teams rigged up the WTC other than insane people whose ego is too big to see they have been utterly duped and fooled.  

[tonymctones]

TONY I wish I could find that video he posted years ago. Shit, that made me speechless, which is hard to do and not often

I wish you could to mom b/c if its anything like the last one he recommended it will take all of 3 secs and google to debunk...

have you looked at the evidence opposing the theories in that video mom?

[240 is Back]

"We have all said we would like to see another investigation..."


That what on god's green earth are we arguing about?  LMAO

[Soul Crusher]

"We have all said we would like to see another investigation..."


That what on god's green earth are we arguing about?  LMAO

The idiocy of the CT's that have been put forth. 

[tonymctones]

tony,

at this point you have very poor information and very weak background.  Honestly, I could argue the official story better than you at this point.

Learn more before making your judgment.  I was an ass to believe the official story and I tried to start a fight with a guy who was a traitor enough to say 'inside job'.  It took me a year of research to reverse my thinking.  But it wasn't until I put my idiot ego aside and admitted "hey, maybe i dont know shit about this topic' that I was able to look at it objectively.

You've believed the official story from minute 1, right?  No amount of arguing from anyone will chnage that.  You have to step back, and say "okay, let's watch a few hours of an opposing viewpoint, and see what they're so riled up about".

You watch loose change 3, as an intro, without interruption, and you come back and you tell me the official story is 100% correct, and that you still agree with it.   No, you'll assume it's already been debunked (LC3 has not) and you will cite some website you found.  That's cool.  Carry on

LOL so educate me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i never said i believe the official story that doesnt mean i believe a missle hit hte pentegon and the towers were rigged with explosives...

have you looked at evidence against your theory 240? everytime someone brings up evidence against your ct's you run away...why not discredit that evidence if you can?

[240 is Back]

the "CT" I subscribe to is that the official story isn't correct, and needs to be investigated in light of the great deal of info which has come to light - and the great dea of info the 911 commission claimed the white house filtered them from receiving before reaching their conclusion.

That's my position.  There are a shitload of Qs out there.  it surely wasn't Dubya with a plunger, but it wasn't 19 toasted arabs that let Osama's family fly out of america on 9/12 on a charter flight...

[Soul Crusher]

the "CT" I subscribe to is that the official story isn't correct, and needs to be investigated in light of the great deal of info which has come to light - and the great dea of info the 911 commission claimed the white house filtered them from receiving before reaching their conclusion.

That's my position.  There are a shitload of Qs out there.  it surely wasn't Dubya with a plunger, but it wasn't 19 toasted arabs that let Osama's family fly out of america on 9/12 on a charter flight...

You just said you believe the WTC was brought down by internal demo. 

[240 is Back]

tony, it would take me 5 years to post every thought I have on 911.  I did it once, trust me, I know how long it takes lol...

watch some documentaries from BOTH SIDES of the issue, and reach your conclusion.  I easily watched 15 or 20 before I reached my conclusion that the story stunk.  And I read pop mech inside and out.  

Do some research - there are ppl devoting years to this - they knoew more about it than you or I.

[240 is Back]

"You just said you believe the WTC was brought down by internal demo.  "

Where did I just say "Internal demo"?

Link please?

[tonymctones]

the "CT" I subscribe to is that the official story isn't correct, and needs to be investigated in light of the great deal of info which has come to light - and the great dea of info the 911 commission claimed the white house filtered them from receiving before reaching their conclusion.

That's my position.  There are a shitload of Qs out there.  it surely wasn't Dubya with a plunger, but it wasn't 19 toasted arabs that let Osama's family fly out of america on 9/12 on a charter flight...

no of course not you subscribe to the towers were rigged with explosives, a missle hit the pentegon etc...

again 240 have you looked at the evidence against your theories? if yes why do you think that evidence is wrong?

[Soul Crusher]

"You just said you believe the WTC was brought down by internal demo.  "

Where did I just say "Internal demo"?

Link please?

In the other thread jackass. 

[240 is Back]

now you konw what belief system i subscribe to?

whatever.  do your research on the issue if you want to learn more.  if youve already made up your mind, then enjoy that belief system and may it make you a happy man.  Maybe you can learn the truth without researching it.  Maybe you KNOW it matched the official story, even if the 911 commissioners say it doesn't.

Sad that a Cter like me can tell you worlds more about the official story than you can lol...

[LurkerNoMore]

After nimwits get pwned by 240 on their guns and ammo argument they resort to WTC and shit?

Deflection at all costs it appears.

[tonymctones]

"You just said you believe the WTC was brought down by internal demo.  "

Where did I just say "Internal demo"?

Link please?

240 - after spending years and years of research as you claim, since you dont believe the "official story" do you believe the following:

1.  WTC was brought down by demolition?

1- yes - too many NYPD and FDNY witnesses of bombs all over the building, and seismic activity showing large blasts in basement 10 seconds before planes hit.  You knew that though, right?

whats that sound like to you brainchild?

cant even keep up with your own ct's

[240 is Back]

'jackass'?

okay, have a nice day.  If i'm going to waste time repeating something over and over, and i'm not going to call names, i'd at least appreciate the same in return.

believe what you'd like, and I'll believe what i wish.  we're not going to change each other's minds.

[Soul Crusher]

Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


      Re: See-no-evil approach to terror attacks is scary
« Reply #11 on: Today at 08:25:18 AM » Quote 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

240 - after spending years and years of research as you claim, since you dont believe the "official story" do you believe the following:

1.  WTC was brought down by demolition?
2.  Pentagon was hit by a missle?
3.  The plane in PA never happened?

1- yes - too many NYPD and FDNY witnesses of bombs all over the building, and seismic activity showing large blasts in basement 10 seconds before planes hit.  You knew that though, right?
2- I dunno - brutal distraction on this one. 
3- I dunno - I agree with Rumsfeld and Michelle Malkin - it was probably shot down, broke up in mid aid.
 
________________________ ________________________

240 - are you losing it bro? 

[240 is Back]

'After nimwits get pwned by 240 on their guns and ammo argument they resort to WTC and shit?"

yeah, no shit.

Hey, 911 911 911 911 911....

Nobody is noticing palin and beck were dogshit wrong on the gun topic.

[tonymctones]

run away, run away 240...

[Soul Crusher]

240 - Tony and I posted your own claim from the other thread now you choose to bolt? 

[240 is Back]

Yes, I believe the NYPD on that part of the 100000 parts of that day.  

overall, my position is that we need another investigation.  My position is not "bombs everywhere!"

My position is, the official story stinks.  I believe the official story on 99% of that day's evetns.  I believe FDNY on that particular part.  

Does that make sense?  My overall position - new investigation needed.
99% of it, I believe the official story
1% I do not.


Make sense?

[LurkerNoMore]

'After nimwits get pwned by 240 on their guns and ammo argument they resort to WTC and shit?"

yeah, no shit.

Hey, 911 911 911 911 911....

Nobody is noticing palin and beck were dogshit wrong on the gun topic.

But... but ..... but..... "the price of ammo"....

Swear to God fucking crybabies can't serve up a plate of bullshit that they don't end up eating afterwards.

[newmom]

I wish you could to mom b/c if its anything like the last one he recommended it will take all of 3 secs and google to debunk...

have you looked at the evidence opposing the theories in that video mom?

I can remember in the video he posted. It was noted how that fucking ugly twat condeliza rice called the San Fran mayor on Sept 10 telling him not to fly and CIA was in Osama's hospital room somewhere in Europe 2 months before the attack. HELLO, they knew he was a fucking Terroists, yeah great job government

[Soul Crusher]

But... but ..... but..... "the price of ammo"....

Swear to God fucking crybabies can't serve up a plate of bullshit that they don't end up eating afterwards.

Did I blame Obama for that?  I asked a simple question knowing 240 shoots guns.

Dont you have a few twinks to take photos of today?