Author Topic: $7-a-gallon gas?  (Read 1305 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39459
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
$7-a-gallon gas?
« on: June 18, 2010, 03:43:00 AM »
$7-a-gallon gas?
By BEN LIEBERMAN

Last Updated: 4:22 AM, June 18, 2010


Posted: 12:02 AM, June 18, 2010

President Obama has a solution to the Gulf oil spill: $7-a-gallon gas.

That's a Harvard University study's estimate of the per-gallon price of the president's global-warming agenda. And Obama made clear this week that this agenda is a part of his plan for addressing the Gulf mess.

So what does global-warming legislation have to do with the oil spill?

Good question, because such measures wouldn't do a thing to clean up the oil or fix the problems that led to the leak.

The answer can be found in Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's now-famous words, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste -- and what I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before."

That sure was true of global-warming policy, and especially the cap-and-trade bill. Many observers thought the measure, introduced last year in the House by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.), was dead: The American people didn't seem to think that the so-called global-warming crisis justified a price-hiking, job-killing, economy-crushing redesign of our energy supply amid a fragile recovery. Passing another major piece of legislation, one every bit as unpopular as ObamaCare, appeared unlikely in an election year.

So Obama and congressional proponents of cap-and-trade spent several months rebranding it -- downplaying the global-warming rationale and claiming that it was really a jobs bill (the so-called green jobs were supposed to spring from the new clean-energy economy) and an energy-independence bill (that will somehow stick it to OPEC).

Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) even reportedly declined to introduce their new cap-and-trade proposal in the Senate on Earth Day, because they wanted to de-emphasize the global-warming message. Instead, Kerry called the American Power Act "a plan that creates jobs and sets us on a course toward energy independence and economic resurgence."

But the new marketing strategy wasn't working. Few believe the green-jobs hype -- with good reason. In Spain, for example, green jobs have been an expensive bust, with each position created requiring, on average, $774,000 in government subsidies. And the logic of getting us off oil imports via a unilateral measure that punishes American coal, oil and natural gas never made any sense at all.

Now the president is repackaging cap-and-trade -- again -- as a long-term solution to the oil spill. But it's the same old agenda, a huge energy tax that will raise the cost of gasoline and electricity high enough so that we're forced to use less.

The logic linking cap-and-trade to the spill in the Gulf should frighten anyone who owns a car or truck. Such measures force up the price at the pump -- Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs thinks it "may require gas prices greater than $7 a gallon by 2020" to meet Obama's stated goal of reducing emissions 14 percent from the transportation sector.

Of course, doing so would reduce gasoline use and also raise market share for hugely expensive alternative fuels and vehicles that could never compete otherwise. Less gasoline demand means less need for drilling and thus a slightly reduced chance of a repeat of the Deepwater Horizon spill -- but only slightly. Oil will still be a vital part of America's energy mix.

Oil-spill risks should be addressed directly -- such as finding out why the leak occurred and requiring new preventive measures or preparing an improved cleanup plan for the next incident. Cap-and-trade is no fix and would cause trillions of dollars in collateral economic damage along the way.

Emanuel was wrong. The administration shouldn't view each crisis -- including the oil spill -- as an opportunity to be exploited, but as a problem to be addressed. And America can't afford $7-a-gallon gas.

Ben Lieberman is senior anal yst of energy and environmental policy in The Heritage Founda tion's Roe Institute.

________________________ _______________________-

Can someone tell me what crap & tax has to do with plugging the damn hole? 

Its called Cloward & Piven and Chicago Thug tactics. 


MRDUMPLING

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Getbig!
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2010, 05:22:51 AM »
Cue Kcballer to still support this crap.  It has nothing to do with global warming you idiots!!!!

MELTDOWN.

225for70

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3127
  • Suckmymuscle is OneMoreRep's little bitch
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2010, 10:56:47 AM »
I remember paying like 4.81 in Stamford, CT in the summer of 08...That's was the beginning of the "collapse".

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39459
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2010, 11:08:49 AM »
I remember paying like 4.81 in Stamford, CT in the summer of 08...That's was the beginning of the "collapse".

I used to keep my Jet Ski docked at a condo complex in Stamford CT called Palmers Landing and they had a gas dock in the channel and I remember paying over $5. 

That was insane.   

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2010, 11:13:10 AM »
Yet Obama really cares about Americans.

225for70

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3127
  • Suckmymuscle is OneMoreRep's little bitch
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2010, 11:35:49 AM »
I used to keep my Jet Ski docked at a condo complex in Stamford CT called Palmers Landing and they had a gas dock in the channel and I remember paying over $5. 

That was insane.   

It cost me about 85 dollars to fill up my car that day...That was the price for Regular...The super was over 5 dollars a gallon.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39459
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2010, 11:41:13 AM »
It cost me about 85 dollars to fill up my car that day...That was the price for Regular...The super was over 5 dollars a gallon.

I have seen some great homes in North Stamford lately.  I am really close on a few deals, but the sellers are still holding out for more.  right off the Merritt, Exit 33-35. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2010, 11:42:26 AM »
 >:(

225for70

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3127
  • Suckmymuscle is OneMoreRep's little bitch
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2010, 11:48:35 AM »
I have seen some great homes in North Stamford lately.  I am really close on a few deals, but the sellers are still holding out for more.  right off the Merritt, Exit 33-35. 


Nice area. you always need a place to live, regardless of losing equity

Those sellers will soon have to stop holding out.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2010, 11:50:47 AM »
gas prices are down 5% over the last month.  I bet they start climbing now.

225for70

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3127
  • Suckmymuscle is OneMoreRep's little bitch
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2010, 11:53:15 AM »
gas prices are down 5% over the last month.  I bet they start climbing now.

I think people are realizing that this peak oil theory may just be a way to squeeze those extra dollars from our pockets. That was the catalyst for lower gas prices in the mean time.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2010, 11:55:35 AM »
yeah, sounds like there's plenty of oil to go around now :)


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39459
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2011, 09:48:19 AM »
BUMP

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19094
  • loco like a fox
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2011, 10:01:53 AM »
Actually, in the near future Americans will be saying "$7-a-gallon gas?  GOOD LORD, that's cheap!"     :(

225for70

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3127
  • Suckmymuscle is OneMoreRep's little bitch
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2011, 10:22:13 AM »
We'll be at 7.00 in no time...


gas is 4.89 for premium on 520 E Putnam Ave & Indian Field Rd in Greenwich

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #15 on: May 05, 2011, 10:28:48 AM »
Yet Obama really cares about Americans.
BM = Bowel Movement?
G

Purge_WTF

  • Guest
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2011, 05:17:03 PM »
I think people are realizing that this peak oil theory may just be a way to squeeze those extra dollars from our pockets. That was the catalyst for lower gas prices in the mean time.

  It's a hoax. Jerome Corsi debunked it well in his book America For Sale, which should be essential reading for everyone who loves this country.

  I don't think it'll get to $7, but I wouldn't rule out $5 by the 4th of July.

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • TND
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #17 on: May 05, 2011, 07:59:49 PM »
It's because of US foreign policy.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39459
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: $7-a-gallon gas?
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2012, 11:31:15 AM »
Bump - obama is finally going to get his dream of skyrocketing energy prices and a crisis.