Author Topic: Kagan Hearing  (Read 3795 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Kagan Hearing
« on: June 28, 2010, 09:51:21 AM »
The repubs don't have much to complain about her, other than lack of experience.  She'll probably whisk thru the nomination process.

She looks completely confused when being criticized.  Maybe a little constipated too.  Still, it's been months and there's no smoking gun to reject her.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2010, 09:53:50 AM »
The repubs don't have much to complain about her, other than lack of experience.  She'll probably whisk thru the nomination process.

She looks completely confused when being criticized.  Maybe a little constipated too.  Still, it's been months and there's no smoking gun to reject her.

She called gun owners part of the KKK.  You are ok with that? 

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2010, 09:56:53 AM »
SHE'S GOING THROUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAAAA!!!!

Thousands and thousands of emails revealed and analyzed and the Repubs still can't find evidence to hold against her. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2010, 09:57:21 AM »
She called gun owners part of the KKK.  You are ok with that?  

Heck no i'm not okay with that.

Still, I'm able to put my emotions aside and realize that even though I don't like her, she's probably going to get nominated.

I hope you don't think my neutral observation of the situation (Repubs not having enough to bounce her) isn't an endorsement.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2010, 10:00:13 AM »
Heck no i'm not okay with that.

Still, I'm able to put my emotions aside and realize that even though I don't like her, she's probably going to get nominated.

I hope you don't think my neutral observation of the situation (Repubs not having enough to bounce her) isn't an endorsement.

 ::)  ::)

I'm sure you got this on your wall bro.   ;D  ;D


The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2010, 11:00:20 AM »
That dude has some raging gyno.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2010, 11:11:36 AM »
Perhaps the GOP's questions will be related to her .380 batting in fast pitch softball.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2010, 11:15:01 AM »
Perhaps the GOP's questions will be related to her .380 batting in fast pitch softball.

Perhaps you will stop being a troll and a sycophantic obama girl?

 

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2010, 11:16:48 AM »
Perhaps you will stop being a troll and a sycophantic obama #girl?

 

Perhaps you will stop being an off topic posting little crybaby?

Well thinking about it, you won't.  But you can try.  (and will fail, but hey... at least you tried)


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61584
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2010, 11:18:25 AM »
I see lurker still lives in his little delusional world. Aside from the fact she's never tried a case before a jury in her life, and judges more on politics than the law and an activist judge...nah, nothing wrong with that (God you're an idiot)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2010, 11:20:13 AM »
Kagan comparing gun owners to kkk members = auto disqualifier in my book. 

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2010, 11:22:29 AM »
I see lurker still lives in his little delusional world. Aside from the fact she's never tried a case before a jury in her life, and judges more on politics than the law and an activist judge...nah, nothing wrong with that (God you're an idiot)

Considering you are regarded as the stupidest person on this board by all (and quite possibly in real life too), your opinion doesn't mean shit short stuff.

"Can someone be so stupid that they don't even know they are stupid"?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2010, 11:25:44 AM »
Kagan comparing gun owners to kkk members = auto disqualifier in my book.  

correct.

However, I disagree with everyone screaming about her lack of experience trying cases.  Who is more prepared to INTERPRET THE LAW?  The lawyer who spent 15 years fighting traffic tickets and slip-and-fall cases - OR the person who has attended Princeton, Oxford, and Harvard Law Schoolworking as a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, leaving to serve as an Associate White House Counsel and later policy adviser under President Bill Clinton, then a professor at Harvard Law School and was later named its Dean, then Solicitor General in 2009.


So her education far outweighs any cries Rush fans parrot about her experience.  But, her point of view on gun rights disqualifies her IMO.  We won't hear this cause ppl will be too loud screaming about why a harvard law professor doesn't konw the law...

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2010, 11:26:36 AM »
Heck no i'm not okay with that.

Still, I'm able to put my emotions aside and realize that even though I don't like her, she's probably going to get nominated.

I hope you don't think my neutral observation of the situation (Repubs not having enough to bounce her) isn't an endorsement.

The republicans are gutless cowards!!The simple fact that Obama the racist filubustered and threatened to fillabuster both Roberts and Alito should be enough to make EVERYONE of them vote against EVERYONE of his nominees.Kagen is a stain on the underwear of Roberts.She is NOTHING compared to him and yet Barack Hussein Obama voted against him.Instantly that should mean that EVERYONE of them vote against every nominee he puts foreward.

No smoking gun?Banning military recruiters from Harvard?Calling NRA members the same as Klan members?Saying the Bork hearings were great?There is far more then enough to justify a NO vote.But your right,they are all gutless and she will sail through.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #14 on: June 28, 2010, 11:28:17 AM »
correct.

However, I disagree with everyone screaming about her lack of experience trying cases.  Who is more prepared to INTERPRET THE LAW?  The lawyer who spent 15 years fighting traffic tickets and slip-and-fall cases - OR the person who has attended Princeton, Oxford, and Harvard Law Schoolworking as a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, leaving to serve as an Associate White House Counsel and later policy adviser under President Bill Clinton, then a professor at Harvard Law School and was later named its Dean, then Solicitor General in 2009.


So her education far outweighs any cries Rush fans parrot about her experience.  But, her point of view on gun rights disqualifies her IMO.  We won't hear this cause ppl will be too loud screaming about why a harvard law professor doesn't konw the law...

Agreed.  The bar is not too high in that regard, but her predisposition on these issues in my mind makes her a disaster for the court. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2010, 11:29:39 AM »
The Constitution of the United States establishes no requirements to be appointed a Justice on the Supreme Court. However, Presidents usually appoint people who have been lawyers or judges or in some way trained in the law.

Practical Considerations


•To be nominated for the position by the current President, and to be accepted and approved by the US Senate. Educational achievements required are not specified. Prior service in the US Court system is not required. Acceptance by the American Bar Association is not required. Just appoint them and approve them, and their job is secure for life.

•While Article III of the Constitution does not specify the qualifications required of a Supreme Court Justice, or specify the size of the court, it does empower Congress to create legislation or make collective decisions that result in de facto requirements.

•Because members of the Supreme Court must be experts on the Constitution, Constitutional law, and federal law, all past and present members of the Supreme Court have been attorneys.

Those who were commissioned before the mid- to late-19th century learned the law by studying and apprenticing with more experienced attorneys; states didn't mandate licensing until the 20th-century.

•Of the 111 Supreme Court members, only 46 have held degrees from accredited law schools; 18 attended law school, but never attained a degree; and 47 were self-taught and/or went through an apprenticeship.

•The first Justice to graduate from law school was Benjamin Robbins Curtis, Harvard class of 1832, appointed to the bench in 1851.

•The last sitting Justice without a formal law degree was Stanley Forman Reed, who served from 1938-1957.

•Today, nominees are judged by the quality of the law school attended and the extent of their experience on the bench. Twenty-two of the 47 degreed candidates graduated from Harvard or Yale, while a number of the remainder graduated from other T14 (Top 14) schools.

•On the current Court, five Justices went to Harvard, two to Yale, one to Columbia and one to Northwestern.

•Credentials have become so important over the last 50 years that, when Richard Nixon named Mildred Lillie and Hershel Friday as potential nominees for the Court in 1971, the American Bar Association objected on the grounds that they were unqualified for the position, and their names were withdrawn from the pool. The ABA also objected to President George W. Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers, his personal attorney and White House counsel, to the bench in 2005.

•Public service and political connections also factor heavily into the nomination process. For example, all but one appointee, George Shiras, Jr. (served 1892-1903), has held public office or been a judge prior to nomination, and three-fifths of the nominees have been personal acquaintances of the President who nominated them.

•While the Constitution stipulates no minimum or maximum age for judicial service, most nominees are under the age of 60, to help ensure a long tenure on the court. Most are in their 40s or 50s when appointed. The youngest Justice ever seated was Joseph Story, at the age of 32, in 1812; the oldest at time of appointment was Charles Evan Hughes, who was 67, in 1930.

•Most of the 111 Supreme Court members have been white, male, protestants. The first Jewish Justice was Louis Brandeis, commissioned in 1916; the first of only two African-Americans was Thurgood Marshall, commissioned in 1967 (the second being Clarence Thomas, who replaced Marshall); the first of three females was Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, commissioned in 1981, and retired in 2006. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and new Justice Sonia Sotomayor are currently serving. In addition to being the only the third female member of the Court, Sonia Sotomayor is also the first Latina commissioned.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61584
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2010, 11:31:40 AM »
Great response Lurker, I'd expect nothing less from a flaming lib much less an debate you can actually back up.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2010, 11:38:37 AM »
Great response Lurker, I'd expect nothing less from a flaming lib much less an debate you can actually back up.

The truth hurts doesn't it?

I can even understand why you are so jealous of her.

1 - She's smarter than you.  (but really so is everyone else and some plant life too)
2 - She's taller than you.
3 - She's more masculine than you.
4 - She's got a bigger dick than you.

About the only thing you can claim over her is more divorces.  Great start!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #18 on: June 28, 2010, 11:40:18 AM »
The truth hurts doesn't it?

I can even understand why you are so jealous of her.

1 - She's smarter than you.  (but really so is everyone else and some plant life too)
2 - She's taller than you.
3 - She's more masculine than you.
4 - She's got a bigger dick than you.

About the only thing you can claim over her is more divorces.  Great start!

Lurker - which dolt are you in this vid? 


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61584
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #19 on: June 28, 2010, 11:42:52 AM »
Another fine, well thought out answer by our resident Village idiot Lurker.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #20 on: June 28, 2010, 11:49:01 AM »
Another fine, well thought out answer by our resident Village idiot Lurker.

As I said... the truth hurts you huh?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #21 on: June 28, 2010, 11:56:28 AM »
As I said... the truth hurts you huh?

Only to obama cultists like yourself as the economy tanks, the gulf spill rages, the world allies balk at obamanomics, and the daily shit show known as the obama admn makes a fool of it self with every passing day.   

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #22 on: June 28, 2010, 12:02:25 PM »
No pics?  No pie charts?  No gay talk?  Not even any made up acronyms?

"Hysterical"

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #23 on: June 28, 2010, 12:06:17 PM »
No pics?  No pie charts?  No gay talk?  Not even any made up acronyms?

"Hysterical"

Again - can you defend anything the obama admn is doing?  NO! 

Hence - you resort to petty nonsense. 


LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33711
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Kagan Hearing
« Reply #24 on: June 28, 2010, 12:09:43 PM »
Again - can you defend anything the obama admn is doing?  NO! 

Hence - you resort to petty nonsense. 



This thread isn't about Obama.  It is about Kagan. 

I would post some quote about how to debate the merits of the thread and such right now to really rub it in your face.... but why bother?

You = FAIL.

Kagan will be confirmed.  Deal with it.  If you hate it, then call your local GOP and cry to them for not asking harder questions and breaking her balls.  (pun)