Nasser was not bigger than Dorian and definitively not as big as him while being so dry and dense. I hope you can understand this.
More striated? Depends on what bodypart you are looking at, overall he wasn't. You can say Ronnie was more striated than Dorian, but not Nasser.
What do you mean by more complete?
Nasser may have had a slight advantage in symmetry over Dorian, but not too much to cause a big overall difference in him being better.
Nasser did not have better hams and equal calves, the only advantage he had in "bodyparts" is biceps.
Better bone structure? Are you kidding?
ok now you're just arguing for the sake of arguing
if you don't know what more complete means you don't know what you're looking at
let's break it down for you
who had better legs? nasser obviously
Who had better arms? nasser
who had a better chest? nasser again
Who's shoulders are better? nasser
but yates still wins lats
by better I mean more balanced, size, shape, condition. post pics of dorian and nasser together to prove any of these statements wrong
